|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 22
Posts: 114
|
cv question
hi,
I tried the CVC, and i thought it was very bright. I heard the cv50 vb on youtube, and it is very hot. So my question is: Is the BSB a mix of the 2?, is it hotter than the cvc, but brighter than the vb? If yes, please tell me cause that is what I am looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: State College PA
Age: 55
Posts: 1,022
|
Don't compare tone on youtube videos. Whoever was playing- what amp settings did he use. Is he using a $5 microphone or a $500 mic? How far was the mic from speaker, or is he recording direct? What recording EQ was he using? What machine/software? Add to that you're most likely playing it back on computer speakers that range from 1/2 inch to 3 inch...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Telefied
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 62
Posts: 31,287
|
The CVC has a 5.8k bridge pickup the CV50's vb is 8.5-8.8k.
The CVC bridge sounds thin and twangy the CV50's vb doesnt sound thin and twangy.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Canada
Age: 22
Posts: 114
|
Yeah that's what i noticed, but what i want to know is how does the BSB sound compare to them? Is it a mix of the two guitars since it's the same wood of the vb and the same pickups of the cvc?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Telefied
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 62
Posts: 31,287
|
Quote:
The CVC is the twangy sorta thin sounding one its Don Rich all the way. When searching for one I always concentrate on the neck feel first once I find one that I like the way it plays I can always make it sound different with strings caps or pickups. My CV50's vb sounds better than my CVC but doesnt get as much playtime.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 456
|
The CV50 used to have hotter Alnico 3 pu's. Now all the CV's have the same lower output Alnico 5's. The perfect combination for me would be the hotter Alnico 3 bridge pu from the older CV50 and the neck Alnico 5 from the CVC. I went with Dimarzio Area T's in my CVC....which I'm liking (especially the no 60 cycle hum). The Area T's are really sensitive to how close they are to the strings. The closer you set them, the louder, punchier, fatter they get. Further from the strings yields an airier, snappier more vintage tone. You can get them pretty close to the strings w/o magnet pull as the T's use Alnico 2's which don't have as much "pull". I have mine "medium close" for some more punch and volume, but still retain all the twang and clarity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Telefied
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 62
Posts: 31,287
|
Quote:
Im sure the DiMarzios are an improvment.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.