|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#81 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 19
|
8's
I've been using Blue Steel 8's anyone who says degradation in tone don't know what they're talkin bout and these are the nicest feel strings i've EVER played on and that's 30 yrs.
__________________
"Money may be you a fine dog, but only love will make him wag his tail." -- Kinky Friedman |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#82 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
http://johnscofield.com/equip.html That said - I think it's all in the touch - some guys get great tone with "8's" - I've found "9's" to be my comfort zone.
__________________
Who loves not women, wine and song, Remains a fool his whole life long. -- Martin Luther |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 413
|
Quote:
Suffice to say that 2/1000ths of an inch is ridiculous to think you will gain or lose tone over. I agree that if you're trying to cop someone's style that you should try to use their guage of strings (use .009's for Albert Lee, use .013's for SRV), but lets not get too stupid about this. Most of that "tone difference" in string guage size is in your head, I'd love to see a closed curtain hearing test on that one some day. I use .010's simply because they're comfortable, but I've went as high as .012's and as low as .009's, which I prefer on Teles. I just say to play with what works for you. Oh and I highly doubt Billy is tuned to C, I've seen enough of the recent live performances, and at least there he isn't tuned down to C, but in the studio I'd buy that. But most of his huge tone comes from the billion digital processors he uses these days and the fact that he has SERIOUSLY MASTERED THE ART OF MIC PLACEMENT!!!! Wow! The guy's tone is always fat, and sassy and DRIPPING in GREASE!! HAVE MERCY! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 172
|
[quote="JTM45blues"]
Quote:
One thing I have notice the three times I have seen ZZ Top live and whenever I see them on TV is that the Reverend has a very light touch on the picking hand - he barely moves - its odd to watch him get that snarling snaky phat tone with such little effort. If you check the stuff on Rhythmeen, Mescalero, XXX against your standard tuned guitar - you'll see that (in the studio, at least) he gets tuned down to C and A pretty often! It's always amazed me how Beck and Page got such killer tones with .008s...
__________________
Who loves not women, wine and song, Remains a fool his whole life long. -- Martin Luther |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: White Mountains
Posts: 5,021
|
At least I gave 'em a shot, 10's that is.
But honestly My Tele has been in The Case for way too long....This evening I'm going back to the 11's
which I use on everything. It just doesn't feel good like I'm gonna scrap the skin near my joints (pickless guy). It does twang a bit more and I've discovered that I prefer a little less twang than the rest of You. I had no idea that Emily Remler used such light gauge strings - but hey - whatever works for You is right-on.
__________________
Somebody Loan Me A Dime |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 172
|
Re: At least I gave 'em a shot, 10's that is.
Quote:
Maybe having thicker cables than the next dude is a guy thing...
__________________
Who loves not women, wine and song, Remains a fool his whole life long. -- Martin Luther |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 405
|
Quote:
*Edit: Just kidding. There's not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 172
|
Quote:
__________________
Who loves not women, wine and song, Remains a fool his whole life long. -- Martin Luther |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,948
|
Quote:
And the whole SRV bridge cable thing has been inflated over the years. I remember reading that he was mostly into 11's and 12's, but always tuned down. Sometimes he tried a 13 because he broke a lot of high-E's, and that story stuck. And let's recall, he wasn't feeling a lot of pain for much of his playing career... Billy Gibbons used to claim to use 13's also, but he was never one to let the truth get in the way of a good interview.
__________________
It takes two people to paint a perfect painting: one to paint it, and the other to shoot him when it's done. http://www.myspace.com/travishartnett http://www.myspace.com/sugarcanemutiny http://www.myspace.com/davidbavas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 405
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 413
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Miami
Posts: 35
|
So have I!
Actually, I swapped the .08 out for a .09 (.09 - .38 now)and I can't believe how much I love them. I taken to using a 2mm Dunlop pick and it might sound dumb, but, it's like all of a sudden I can rip off runs like never before.
As far as the sound. Absolutely no complaints. I like it better than when I was using .11's. The low tension means a lot of sizzle, for lack of a better word. I tried this little experiment in my MIM Tele ourfitted with Duncan 59's, a regular size in the neck and a Lil' one in the bridge that is wired through a push pull pot allowing series or parallel for that pickup. Tons of crunch in series and very bright with easy pinch harmonics running the bridge pickup in parallel mode. One thing I've noticed in the string gauge to tone debate is that my Tele loves the thin strings as does my Jackson with a Duncan JB/Jazz combo, but, when I tried to go to .09's on my Strat with low output CS '69 and 62 Reissue pups it was very anemic, wimpy even. Now I took that and strung it up .10-.42 (High E and B from a .10 set, the rest from as set of .09's) and tuned down to Eb. Weird. That's what that guitar likes. Since it's my "Jimi Hendrix mood" axe, it's right in line. I don't see myself going back to heavy strings any time soon. All this and no numb fingers anymore.
__________________
It's Sunday afternoons that get to you... |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Posts: 772
|
Depends on the instrument . . .
To maximize a tele, you need to experiment for the right combination of gauges ..different sizes for different teles. And both camps are right ..super-slink strings will sound dumb on many teles, but then, guys like James Burton and Bob Warford come along with great tone (using small strings).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,421
|
No matter what arguments are brought up, it all comes down to personal taste.
And in my case I'll gladly stick to the 011-049 set I have used for years, they feel right for me and they can endure much more than lighter strings.
__________________
"I reject your reality and subsitute my own." - Adam Savage, Mythbusters |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 302
|
I tried some of those once, GHS Boomers .008 on my MIM Tele, and I hated them. It felt like there was nothing under my fingers when I played, which confused me, and the tone was really weak sounding. I went back to .009-.046 (custom light) only a week later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 13
|
I've been using .008's all my playing life.
I've always gotten compliments on my tone. I guess it's just a matter of what you are used to and knowing how to work various guages for the best possible tone. I've tried .009's and .010's and they always sounded pretty bad (with me playing them). Go figure. |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
I can play an electric with 11's or 8's. I prefer the midddle ground though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#101 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Age: 40
Posts: 946
|
What I use
I use my Tele for straight ahead jazz. I have been using Thomstik 12s or 13s flatwounds. I just got a 2005 NAMM 52 RI with the humbucker in the neck.
Anyone who's been playing for any length of time knows for a fact that sting guage will definately change tone. Especially through a clean signal. 20 Years ago when i played rock I used 9s. The string guage/tone isn't as important when your signal is dripping with effects. Overdrive or distortion will pretty much nullify any real differences in the tone due to string guage. I liked the thinner guages so I could bend my strings without watching my fingernails come away from my fingertips. For some "cleaner" players such as Robert Cray, John Mayer, or SRV, the string guage matters a lot. Because they're signal is relatively clean. if you like a clean sounding guitar then I highly recommend changing string guages before you modify anything else. Going from 8s to 13s with a clean signal is the difference between night and day. Likewise, 13 round wounds sounds MUCH brighter than 13 flatwounds. The sound is "thinner" on lighter guage strings. I wouldn't call it "whimpy." But if you want the bell-tone pop of like John Mayer or Eric Clapton, you'll have to sting up some heavy guage strings. If you want some Metallica or some AC/DC. any guage will likely do. My two cents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#102 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 138
|
I started with 9s, then went to 11s, occasionally 12s, because I was playing a lot of blues, and thought that was the "right" gauge to play. (I was young.)
As I've gotten older, and my hands have started to bother me more, I've started using lighter strings. But I can't go lighter than 10s. It just doesn't feel right. Coincidentally, just last night, I was going some work on my Tele, and, after I was done, I strung it up with 11s, although I've been using 10s. It just didn't sound right to me, especially on the bass strings. I messed around with amp settings, picking attack, etc., but I was worried that I'd somehow put my pickups in a strange configuration or something. I put 10s back on, and there it was ... that glorious sound. It felt a little looser, but not too loose; I like to have some dynamic tension with my strings. The only guitars that I feel must have heavy strings are those I'm using for slide. With a heavy slide (which I favor) there needs to be enough tension to keep the slide from fretting out. Can I play slide on 10s or 9s? Yeah, but I don't like the sound or feel, and my arm is actually more tense (and hence, less controlled) than with heavier strings, because I have to take positive action to keep the slide from fretting out. edit to add Ed posted while I was posting ... but I agree, the differences are far more pronounced with clean tones than processed. I do think that, without compression or other forms of tone-shaping, there's a point of diminishing returns with thinning strings. And none of the artists mentioned who play with really light strings are known for their clean tones (except Albert Lee, although I'd hazard a guess that he knows his way around a compressor.)[/i] |
|
|
|
|
|
#103 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Quote:
__________________
"I might be powerfully concerned, but not scared." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 66
|
.008s...
One more .008"s player to throw into the mix: Richard Thompson always used them his '57 Strat, I believe.
For me it's 10's on Fenders, and 11's with a 12 top – blame the Bigsby – on the ES-330... |
|
|
|