The Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world. Information on electric guitars, amps, effects, and more. With guitar photo galleries, Free guitar Classified Ads, guitar reviews, music and guitar articles, guitar resources and more.
fender telecaster electric guitar discussion forum and galleries and classifieds and reviews.
Make a donation with PayPal Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day

Supporting Vendors
Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence El Dorado Guitar Accessories Lace Music Products Acme Guitar Works Carlton Guitars GuitarSale.com Warmoth.com
advertise on the tdpri 
 

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Telecaster Discussion Forum

Notices

Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here.

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 25th, 2009, 03:54 PM   #1 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 15,215
Anyone ever sand a vintage style bridgeplate to crazy thin?

The typical stock Fender vintage plate is .045-.050 inches, thickness.

We know than sanding the underside and getting it flat is a good deal.

Has anyone kept right on sanding until the plate was .030 or even .025?

What does the guitar sound like with a super-thin plate? Squeal City?

Or enough twang to tie your ears in a knot?

__________________
When i listen
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 04:25 PM   #2 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
Mark Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 59
Posts: 17,164
As long as its flat and the pickup is potted it wont squeal.

Ive sanded them so its completly flat but never went nuts and tried to make it paper thin.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses.
Mark Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 06:02 PM   #3 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
MattC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ohio
Age: 36
Posts: 50
Hey Boris,

I ordered one to put on my 2008 HWY 1 tele. I just liked the look of the vintage one. I spent about 1 hour sanding the bottom as flat as I could get it. I had to take a few breaks, I worked up one heck of a sweat! I used several sheets of 80 grit sand paper.

After an hour I still didnt get the very center as flat as the rest of the bridge. I went ahead and put it on anyway. I tried it for a few days but all of the sustain and the "certain" sound my tele had unplugged and plugged in had gone. Parts of the body that would vibrate didnt vibrate as much or at all.

I put the old bridge back on...before I did I checked it with 80 grit sand paper to see how flat it was....It was dead flat!!!!. I put it back on and all the sustain and sound was back. The original bridge looked better made than the vintage which really suprised me. The original seemed just a bit heavier before I sanded the vintage.

PM me if you would like the vintage bridge, I will send it to you for free and you can sand some more of it to do your test!

PS Youre advice and info on the new tuners for my tele was spot on. The new vintage tuners look great and work perfect. The conversion bushings where a perfect fit.
MattC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 06:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
GhostofJohnToad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Age: 36
Posts: 1,150
Interesting I have never heard this idea of sanding the bottom of the bridge. What is the theory on this? Is the idea that more of the baseplate is in contact with the body so therefore increased sutain, vibrational transference, etc?
GhostofJohnToad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 06:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: jacksonville, fl.
Posts: 169
I went a different way. Bought a body that required a standard bridge. I was intrigued by Melancon Guitar take that drops the bridge pup directly into the body and not mounted on the bridge. My neighbor had a lathe, so I cut the pickup portion out - mounted the pickup directly to the body and kept the brass bridge at full thickness. To my ears, it did take some of the highs off but kept the resonance. Consider cutting the bridge in half and leaving the thickness alone.
telemania is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 06:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Glasgow
Age: 39
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by boris bubbanov View Post
We know than sanding the underside and getting it flat is a good deal.
Why?
maxwas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 08:10 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
6x47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern ON
Age: 65
Posts: 571
Cause!
6x47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 25th, 2009, 10:57 PM   #8 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
e-merlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garden City, KS
Age: 47
Posts: 9,377
It gives the bridge better contact with the body and, in theory, cuts down on microphonics.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Cane View Post
Before the internet we didn't know everything we did was wrong....unless of course we were married.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Del Pickup View Post
'tone is in the underpants'
e-merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26th, 2009, 12:21 AM   #9 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
Mark Davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 59
Posts: 17,164
If the bridge isnt flat it can make a harmonic vibration that starts the feedback chain.

I just used 320 grit black sandpaper wet on a known flat surface.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses.
Mark Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26th, 2009, 01:41 AM   #10 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 15,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by telemania View Post
I went a different way. Bought a body that required a standard bridge. I was intrigued by Melancon Guitar take that drops the bridge pup directly into the body and not mounted on the bridge. My neighbor had a lathe, so I cut the pickup portion out - mounted the pickup directly to the body and kept the brass bridge at full thickness. To my ears, it did take some of the highs off but kept the resonance. Consider cutting the bridge in half and leaving the thickness alone.
Those Melancons are beautiful.

Yeah, I've been fooling with half bridges, also:



This Taipan/No-caster didn't kill played through the RI Twin, but through the Custom Vibrolux, yum!
__________________
When i listen
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26th, 2009, 01:47 AM   #11 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 15,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattC View Post
Hey Boris,

I ordered one to put on my 2008 HWY 1 tele. I just liked the look of the vintage one. I spent about 1 hour sanding the bottom as flat as I could get it. I had to take a few breaks, I worked up one heck of a sweat! I used several sheets of 80 grit sand paper.

After an hour I still didnt get the very center as flat as the rest of the bridge. I went ahead and put it on anyway. I tried it for a few days but all of the sustain and the "certain" sound my tele had unplugged and plugged in had gone. Parts of the body that would vibrate didnt vibrate as much or at all.

I put the old bridge back on...before I did I checked it with 80 grit sand paper to see how flat it was....It was dead flat!!!!. I put it back on and all the sustain and sound was back. The original bridge looked better made than the vintage which really suprised me. The original seemed just a bit heavier before I sanded the vintage.
Glad the tuners worked out great.

*

I guess it shouldn't be too big a surprise - surely Dale Clark or somebody would've tapped into the extra twang if a thinner plate got you there.

Here's what will happen. Some science guy will devise a means of establishing which frequencies a particular neck and body respond most favorably to. Then the bridge plate will be custom milled from billet to respond to the favored frequencies, like a tuned pipe on a motorcycle. Or, if the guitar sounds too 1 dimensional, to the harmonics of those primary frequencies.

BTW the Taipantone plate showed above is .060. Fender and Glendale are still the skinny plate kings!
__________________
When i listen
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26th, 2009, 08:21 AM   #12 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Maryland
Age: 58
Posts: 1,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by boris bubbanov View Post
Glad the tuners worked out great.

*

I guess it shouldn't be too big a surprise - surely Dale Clark or somebody would've tapped into the extra twang if a thinner plate got you there.

Here's what will happen. Some science guy will devise a means of establishing which frequencies a particular neck and body respond most favorably to. Then the bridge plate will be custom milled from billet to respond to the favored frequencies, like a tuned pipe on a motorcycle. Or, if the guitar sounds too 1 dimensional, to the harmonics of those primary frequencies.

BTW the Taipantone plate showed above is .060. Fender and Glendale are still the skinny plate kings!
Boris, the science guys came and left long ago, shaking their heads. Tele's are strictly "shade-tree engineering". With a very few exceptions, the best parts-makers we know make their products the way they do because a lot of experimentation led them to their current designs. I don't discount the technical knowledge some have, but we never see anyone put forward a mathematical model of complex mechanical bridge impedance either.

And there's nothing wrong with that. Instruments designed by musicians usually sound better.
Ricky D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 26th, 2009, 10:51 AM   #13 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
vanguard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: salt lake city
Age: 28
Posts: 746
boy, those glendale cold rolled steel plates are thin! i swapped out a 52 fender plate for one and it looked and felt considerably thinner. both plates sounded fine, with the glendale having more brilliance and clarity. was this because of the thinner plate? who the hell knows.
__________________
my band's myspace. featuring our new video!

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm...ndid=261142458
vanguard is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacing MIM bridgeplate with lighter Vintage nlopez Telecaster Discussion Forum 11 April 3rd, 2009 09:49 PM
Gone crazy - body style robbysturgis Telecaster Discussion Forum 5 September 18th, 2008 12:38 PM
My first neck finish. Wet sand vs. dry sand? jguitarman Tele-Tech 5 March 18th, 2008 07:25 AM
Desert Sand on a Vintage Telecaster? tonewoods Telecaster Discussion Forum 7 August 9th, 2007 01:47 PM
Can I just sand the finish to thin down the poly coat halfmassive Tele-Tech 17 November 30th, 2005 03:48 AM




IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.