|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | T-Shirts & Etc | Music | Photos | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: new york State
Posts: 83
|
Guitar wieght hanging from neck stand???
Hello folks.
This may seem like a crazy question, (don't laugh). Has anyone come across any problems with the method of displaying their guitar by hanging it on a guitar tree stand over the years where the weight of the body over time could put strain on the neck joint as well as the truss rod. I know guitars hang for years some times before being sold. I thought of this the other day as i have a Hercules 3 guitar tree (stand) and the weight oh the guitar as you lift it to remove it from the release? Just a honest Question |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
VENDOR
Poster Extraordinaire
|
I view it as beneficial ......as in counteracting the tension of the strings, I prefer hanging by the neck, over a conventional stand or case storage...but I'm just going by my Gut...I'm sure some Engineer types will weigh in, and prove me wrong......
__________________
Expert Repair....ReCrafting...and Set-ups Making your World a Better Place...One Guitar at a time
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Florida
Age: 39
Posts: 464
|
I know a store where the same solidbody's been hanging since 1979. I'm not gonna tell you where it is
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston Area
Age: 32
Posts: 603
|
I highly recommend this Hercules wall mount with security arms: http://www.worldmusicsupply.com/guit...es/GSP39WB.asp
The weight of the guitar rotates the arms up into place guarding against the guitar being knocked out of the mount. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Birkenhead, Merseyside, UK
Age: 22
Posts: 408
|
speaking from an engineering background I'd suggest that itd be mostly fine, but using some of my nowse id say that it could conceivably weaken glued-in necks like on les pauls (after a significant length of time) but as the bolt on style necks have perpendicular through the body and to the neck, they *should* be stronger when hung.
but i wouldnt worry at all, just vague assumptions!
__________________
Made in Merseyside 1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
well since strings (depending on the size you use, and your tuning) can put upwards of 200 lbs of tension
No worries. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 15,033
|
Quote:
__________________
When i listen |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Fatmanville, Cambs., UK
Posts: 3,531
|
Quote:
No wonder you have an average post count of over 13 per day!.....
__________________
. . ![]() . "Behind every argument is someone's ignorance." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Birkenhead, Merseyside, UK
Age: 22
Posts: 408
|
haha now i didnt know that there was that kind of tension in the strings, facinating what pains we put through our truss rods eh?
__________________
Made in Merseyside 1987 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Boston Area
Age: 32
Posts: 603
|
Quote:
I gotta get me a string winder... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
The engineer in me agrees with what others have said - not harmful nor particulatly beneficial in offsetting string tension. Even the forces induced by string tension are well below the yield strength of either wood or a glued joint - which, of course is why they don't break absent some "help".
Jim
__________________
Reflection upon my playing is a reminder to keep my regular job..........pays better but not nearly as enjoyable!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
NEW MEMBER!
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Age: 30
Posts: 9
|
I've always thought that it was counter-intuitive to think that hanging it would help the neck. The neck is designed to serve under the tension of the strings, so while hanging the tension on the neck is different than while in use. Over time does it affect it? Who knows, just my crazy thoughts. :)
I will say that my solid ash tele is so heavy as to inspire a little concern while hanging rather than sitting in a stand...my alder guitars seem just fine. <----not an engineer btw :) |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bloomfield, Connecticut
Age: 56
Posts: 742
|
My Tele is probably my lightest guitar at 6 1/2 pounds and my Les Paul is a boat anchor at 8 1/2 pounds (I hate to think what my ES-335 weighs). If it is any indication of how little hanging guitars hurts the necks, I rarely have to retune my guitars if they've been hanging for a few days without playing. Seems like that would say something.
__________________
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese... |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Crowley, Texas
Posts: 1,102
|
I'm pretty sure that California
has legislation in work to prevent this kind of cruelty to guitars. No offense to you Ca. TDPRI brothers & sisters.
__________________
If I won the Lotto.... I'd just build (OK, OK Assemble) guitars and sell them till the money ran out |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 163
|
I've owned a few Gibson's that did not do well on a wall hanger. One in particular, a flying v did not do well at all and constantly needed truss rod adjustment until I decided to leave it in it's case. Fenders seem to do alright though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wylie, TX US
Posts: 3,102
|
Quote:
Melle, You know I have immense respect for you, and I would just as soon stick rusted jagged knitting needles in my eyeballs as to say your wrong, but I think you haven't thought it out enough. The combined force of the strings to the headstock comes from a vector on TOP of the bridge. For direction's sake, let's assume you are holding the guitar in a playing position. The force of that vector bends the neck in a direction away from your body. The truss rod counteracts this force and allows the action across the fretboard to be usable. If I were to push the back of the headstock forward (away from me), the pitch would go flat (like Redd does when he plays) because I relieving the neck. If I pull the headstock back towards me, it will go sharp, increasing the force on the strings. When a guitar is hung vertically on a fork type stand under the headstock, the tension from the strings (~85 to 150lbs), keeps the neck "curled up". There is not much in the way of a gravity vector to "unbow" or relieve the neck since gravity is not perpendicular to the force. However, the guitar laying down on its back will affect the tension of the strings MORE than hanging. That is a reason to NEVER set the bridge intonation with the guitar on a bench. It should be done holding the guitar normally. The neck is "flimsy" in one direction and very "rigid" in the other. You can sit there and push the headstock toward you or away from you and change the pitch significantly. Pushing the neck towards the floor or ceiling gets you no where. Experiments: Plug you guitar into a good tuner while holding the guitar in a playing position and tune any open string up to 440 pitch as accurately as possible. Pluck the string. While the note is still ringing, turn the guitar over on it back. Make sure you are not touching the neck. The pitch increases for me by ~5 cents. While holding the guitar in a playing position, the tuning is still on 440 as accurately as possible. Pluck the string. While the note is still ringing, turn the guitar face down. Make sure you are not touching the neck. The pitch decreases for me by ~5 cents. When I did the same and held the guitar vertical like a wall hanger, I could not measure a change. In summary what I surmise iz, the force created by gravity would reduce the tension of the strings IF the force could bend the neck forward. The neck is very structurally rigid lengthwise. It is only easy to bend in one axis. Of course all this would vary with neck thicknesses, string tension, quartersawn neck, density of wood, and phase of the moon. Try it yourself and let me know your results. This is fun. If nothing else this post should raise the awareness level of intonating guitars in the playing position only. I've never seen that mentioned on the TDPRI, but that don't mean it ain't here somewhere. BTW, that is a great question. It's not going to hurt the guitar to hang it vertically. I'd be more concerned the dust collection aspect and with the material of the hanger to make sure it will not harmfully interact with the neck finish. NO URETHANES!!!
__________________
Best regards, Terry Downs http://terrydownsmusic.com Equine quadrupeds may be coaxed to the reference of specific gravity but may not be compelled to imbibe thereof. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.