Telecaster Guitar Forum
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone with respect, no matter how difficult that may be. No hate, politics, religion, sex or drug discussions.
No Commercial Posts: Do not use the TDPRI to buy or sell anything.
Telecaster Guitar Resources Guitar T-shirts
Guitar Tuner
6
E
5
A
4
D
3
G
2
B
1
E
Telecaster Music Shop

Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day






Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Telecaster Discussion Forum
Home Forum Resources Shop Gallery Classifieds Reviews Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here.

Forum Jump

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 7th, 2008, 01:51 AM   #1 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,176
Fret Access Cutaway Question

I'm wondering if any Telecaster owners out there have a contour on their cutaway to make fret access easier/comfortable...

Any preferences? Turnoffs?

This is what I've got so far. It's got a carved top and back with a constant radius except for the middle where the bridge and pups go (which is flat), and the ferrules. It feels very comfortable on the forearm and the belly, but I might also give it an actual belly cut too.



Wondering how far in I should go on the cutout. These pencil marks are only a guide at this stage. Not sure if the upper bit needs contouring, but it looks better mefinks.

How far in do I butcher the thing?!

Cheers!
__________________
Nick JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2008, 03:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
beep.click's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: California
Age: 49
Posts: 1,591
Gut feel -- you'd notice the most difference if you worked the neck heel.

I like the idea of a contour on the cutaway more as a cosmetic feature. So I say, go with whatever looks best.
__________________
"It looked like a giant green gum drop to me."
beep.click is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2008, 08:47 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 61
Posts: 572
Hey Nick- Have a look at these. http://www.dpergoguitars.com

I thought this is one interesting solution and it might work on your neck-through. It is a neck-through, huh?

BTW- where's the story and pics on the rest of that guitar? Have we seen it before?
reddogbass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2008, 06:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,176
Quote:
Originally Posted by reddogbass View Post
Hey Nick- Have a look at these. http://www.dpergoguitars.com

I thought this is one interesting solution and it might work on your neck-through. It is a neck-through, huh?

BTW- where's the story and pics on the rest of that guitar? Have we seen it before?
Cheers, guys.

That does look comfortable.


Yes, it's a neck-through, 100% radiata pine! But it's not a "guitar" ... it's the master-shape of another guitar to be done in carbon/kevlar/alloy so cosmetics don't matter, just shape and the all-important perfect surface finish. One of its babies will probably get a build thread (if Jack keeps bugging me ). Since "clones" are made of this shape it needs to be a real "player" - and this way of building means every last nuance is transfered to the final copy ... so the master-copy has to be perfect! Sure makes me nervous when I stand over it with my grinder dong 10,000rpm . I'm really liking the headstock's angle (no string holder-downers!) and the carved body.

Lots more work.



It's 1.7" thick in the middle tapering off to just over an inch at the edge.
__________________
Nick JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 7th, 2008, 07:42 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
6x47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern ON - Northern MN
Age: 64
Posts: 472
If the reason for a contour on the cutaway is to make fret access easier, would not the contour be dictated by the size of your hand and where you want to place it?

For example a D flat six string chord at the 21st using the same fingering as you would at the 9th would require a contour depth dependent on both hand size and angle of attack (Now watch some genius declare, "Why would you want that chord at that position anyhow?").
6x47 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 4th, 2008, 12:55 AM   #6 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,176
An update. I got the "guitar" finished in 5oz glass cloth and black epoxy (no clear on top) so I could see any defects and get it smooth. A pack of strings are there to show the depth; you can also see the distant hills! That angled headstock is really starting to grow on me. It's got a rolled front and back radius, except on the middle of the back and front - if that makes sense. It's not a constant radius. Very comfortable.

The black finish just before buffing and waxing looked just like the whole guitar was made from ebony.



Next we need to do some cloning... .
__________________
Nick JD is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump

Reply


Thread Tools



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Forums Directory

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2006 All rights reserved.