|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
The Esquire attraction ??
OK, the simplicity with one pickup looks wise is obvious enough to appreciate [to me] Solid black or white guard, just nice, no doubt.
I read someone had said the following Quote:
Which of course brings me to the hidden neck PUP concept. Effect on the string with a hotter PUP hidden under the guard etc... ? Discuss? Last edited by robt57; June 1st, 2008 at 02:08 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Hmmm.... Having been a two pickup Tele player for a couple of years, I can definitely tell a difference between a Tele and an Esquire. I guess it has something to do with the magnetic pull the neck pup has, but when I play my Esquire, or any other for that matter, the strings feel different. Almost lighter. I also hear sounds that I haven't heard with a Telecaster.
One thing that I do know for sure is if I had to choose one or the other solely based on looks, the Esquire would win hands down. I also think Esquires are "nastier". I like nasty.
__________________
When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace. - Jimi Hendrix
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
|
What's weird about esquires for me at least, after playing one for a little bit it made me appreciate a neck pickup more...I was never a big neck pickup fan but I am more so now than ever ironically.
If you really want to get nasty try wiring the bridge pickup straight to the jack and bypass both the tone and volume pots. I agree that not having the neck pickup changes things, especially when you strum where the neck pickup should be, it's totally different. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 456
|
This is highly debated on this forum all the time. I say just go out and play one. It will only become aparent when you start playing one. I have an Esquire that I don't play that much. Everytime I do play it, it immediately strikes me as to how different it acutally is than a telecaster. My whole playing style is effected by these differences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: on the bridge pickup
Posts: 108
|
To me an Esquire is the definition of an electric guitar. It is so alive and present. I also love a good tele with a neck pickup but when it comes to just letting it fly there is nothing IMHO more powerful and present in the mix especially live like an Esquire.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,334
|
I have a 50s classic Esquire that I love I've had a Joe Barden pickup in it that I loved
I didn't like Kinman Avn60 in it to thin sounding At first I believed that the pull of the neck pickup made much of a difference, but now I don't Now I have a Don Mare "The Tweed Monster" Bridge Pickup and S-tele Neck Pickup and a 50s Stratotone Pickup in the middle Don wired it up with a push pull pot that takes out the volume and tone and the bridge sounds better and more vibrant then it did with just one pickup |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 58
Posts: 12,846
|
Here was my 1st experience with an Esquire.
I had a 2 pickup 50's Classic that I had tried several pickups in. 5 different ones in the bridge 4 different pickups in th neck. Then I got the idea to take all the pickups out replace the bridge with the pickup from my 1953 Fender Champion lap steel and make it into an Esquire. As soon as I strung it up I could tell the difference even before I plugged it in. When I plugged it in the whole guitar seemed like it was easier for the sound to come out. Harmonics were everywhere on the big E string. Before I made eit into an Esquire I could do chimes at the normal places 5-7-12 etc after it was an Esquire I could do harmonics in places Ive never been able to do them seemed like every 1/4" I moved my hand it found harmonics Id never even heard. It was sorta like I was running for a touchdown before and someone was on my back piggyback as an Esquire it was like the person that was on my back keeping me from running as fast jumped off. The whole guitar becane way more responsive.
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 82
|
Quote:
I would totally be into that if it were possible... dt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Garden City, KS
Age: 46
Posts: 6,892
|
Guess I think Teles are "alive" compared to other guitars. When I got my Esquire, it seemed "more alive" if that's possible. Gotta plug 'em into an amp that's turned up. You can feel it in the neck. The way the amp responds to the guitar and the way the guitar responds to the amp. It's a feel thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Age: 43
Posts: 656
|
I have to agree with other posters here. My Esquire lets through harmonics and nuances that get sucked dry in a Tele. The Esquire rings and sustains more too. The Esquire is more raw sounding, even less forgiving then a tele... and it's WAY more rock'n'roll.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Age: 43
Posts: 656
|
Also, see here...
9 Topics down... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Age: 40
Posts: 946
|
I don't think I would ever use an Esquire as the definition of an electric guitar. But they are different. Though, from a physics standpoint, I highly doubt that the magnetic pull on the strings from the neck pup is the reason. I personally think this is a lot of hullabaloo. But I know there's a lot of people here who would disagree.
__________________
Sorry, not the real Ed Bickert. Just a fan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
|
Good question, I'd like to try that too...Or maybe have the bridge go through the volume only with a no-load pot...Or maybe use 2 no-loads 1 for volume and 1 for tone then you could have both the neck and bridge hot...I'm not sure a no-load is the same as direct though.
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!" |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.