Telecaster Guitar Forum
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone with respect, no matter how difficult that may be. No hate, politics, religion, sex or drug discussions.
No Commercial Posts: Do not use the TDPRI to buy or sell anything.
Telecaster Guitar Resources Guitar T-shirts
Guitar Tuner
6
E
5
A
4
D
3
G
2
B
1
E
Telecaster Music Shop

Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day
 

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Telecaster Discussion Forum

Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here.

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 31st, 2008, 07:20 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: hazlet,Nj
Age: 21
Posts: 153
A question about 250k pots compared to 500k?

whats the difference, do the 500k give the guitar a better sounder sound cause if thats the case ill go with 500...its for a telecaster, is that truley the difference or is it for something else??? thanks
Shelby21 is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old May 31st, 2008, 07:28 PM   #2 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: St. Louis, Missourah
Posts: 19
I do not know how to explain but get 250K for a tele. Rule of thumb, 500k for hums and p-90, 250K for singles unless Jazzmasters, they use 1meg.
__________________
Chris K-Line

ckroenlein@sbcglobal.net
K-Line is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2008, 08:16 PM   #3 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,578
This says:

As a potentiometer is turned fully down, all of the signal from the pickup(s) is diverted to ground, resulting in no output from the instrument. When the potentiometer is turned up to full volume, the resistance of the potentiometer theoretically prevents any of the output signal leaking to ground, and weakening the output signal. Lower value pots, however, do not completely block the signal from leaking to ground even when turned up all the way, so using a 250k potentiometer will result in a slight loss of high frequency, as well as volume. This may please some musicians who want a mellower tone, but for those seeking ultimate purity of signal, a higher value potentiometer may be just what is needed. The higher the value, the more leakage is blocked from ground, which allows more of the signal to be sent to the output. A 500k pot may be just right, but a 1meg ohm pot will provide an all out sonic assault. Higher highs; lower lows; more volume - a rocker's dream! The only drawback of going to this higher value is the perceived range and sweep of the control. It's like going from 0 to 10 without the fine increments of control in between.

The Telecaster® is a good example of potentiometers determining the overall sound of an electric instrument. The earliest Telecasters® utilized 1meg ohm potentiometers. They were deemed too bright to be practical for a wide range of musical styles. As a result, the potentiometers were changed to 250k to "bleed off" some of the extreme treble "twang" that the early versions were known and loved for (Stratocasters® also use 250k pots for the same reason). Some Gibson® laptop guitars had 5 meg ohm pots. Talk about bright!


So the confusing thing about why a bigger number makes a "clearer" sound is because the pot naturally "leaks" some sound (to ground), so bigger number = better able to "resist" leaking - not extra resistance in the signal. But the difference between 1M pots and wired straight from the pickup to the jack isn't much.
__________________
Nick JD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2008, 08:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
surfoverb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick JD View Post
This says:
The Telecaster® is a good example of potentiometers determining the overall sound of an electric instrument. The earliest Telecasters® utilized 1meg ohm potentiometers. They were deemed too bright to be practical for a wide range of musical styles. As a result, the potentiometers were changed to 250k to "bleed off" some of the extreme treble "twang" that the early versions were known and loved for (Stratocasters® also use 250k pots for the same reason). Some Gibson® laptop guitars had 5 meg ohm pots. Talk about bright!
I'm not sure where they got that info...Going by the Duchossoir book Teles used 250K Ohm pots from 1950-1967 (the original circuit hand drawn by Leo himself calls for 1/4 meg) after which they used a 1meg for volume and in '69 a 1meg for tone as well....The rule of thumbs is the higher the number the more high-end gets through but less sweep. Just try different pots and see what happens. I can tell you there's barely a difference between a 250K pot and the pickup direct to the jack so take that FWIW.
surfoverb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2008, 08:41 PM   #5 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Flat357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 40
Posts: 2,913
Pots are cheap & easy to swap with a little knowledge .

Single coil pups generally use 250k , but there is no ' must use ' when it comes to instruments and amps .

Smooth volume swells are also better with 250k in my opinion too .

Buy a few of each and experiment , but if you are unsure , and have single coils , try 250k .
Flat357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2008, 09:13 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: hazlet,Nj
Age: 21
Posts: 153
i mean i have 250 in all my guitars and they sound great, im just looking for a more kick ass like power sound from the first strum of the strings i guess i though 500k would work
Shelby21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31st, 2008, 09:25 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
surfoverb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shelby21 View Post
i mean i have 250 in all my guitars and they sound great, im just looking for a more kick ass like power sound from the first strum of the strings i guess i though 500k would work
Turn up the amp if you want more power.
surfoverb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 10:27 AM   #8 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Joe Chaney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: aude, France
Age: 16
Posts: 455
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfoverb View Post
Turn up the amp if you want more power.
what if you're on ten at the amp already
thats why amps need to go up to 11
__________________
If you're not careful, It'll stick to your cheeks, and You'll smell like a native, For a couple of weeks
In France
Joe Chaney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 11:07 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
surfoverb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Chaney View Post
what if you're on ten at the amp already
thats why amps need to go up to 11
Thats why I use 1 million ohm pots...they are super powerfull!
surfoverb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 08:03 PM   #10 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfoverb View Post
Thats why I use 1 million ohm pots...they are super powerfull!
Oh surfoverb, you just can't resist.
__________________
Nick JD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 10:09 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Ed Bickert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Age: 40
Posts: 946
FWIW I use a 250K pot with my Benedetto A6 equipped (in the neck) tele. I actually prefer the 250K pot on the bucker. But that might just be me.
__________________
Sorry, not the real Ed Bickert. Just a fan.
Ed Bickert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 11:42 PM   #12 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
tdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wylie, TX US
Posts: 2,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick JD View Post

The higher the value, the more leakage is blocked from ground, ...

...a 1meg ohm pot will provide an all out sonic assault. Higher highs; lower lows; more volume ...
That first statement makes no sense.

The second statement is false. There is negligible change in the lows among pot values. I've done the analysis and simulation to prove it. The "leak" word is used a lot in this topic, which is not really what is happening.

A resonance exists between the inductance of the pickup and the total capacitance of the cable and amp input (and tone network if dialed in). If there is no volume pot, or a very high resistance one, that resonance can be quite large. It is a peak in frequency response. This resonance is generally in the treble region around 3-4kHz. If a longer cable is used, and/or the inductance of the pickup is higher, this resonance can be tuned to more in the midrange spectrum. So, having a high resistance pot does not always mean a peak of highs, but it is peak somewhere in frequency. With a Tele and a nominal instrument cable and amp input capacitance, the resonance is almost inevitably in the treble region. When a lower resistance pot is used, the peak of that resonance is lowered. On a regular Tele bridge pickup, a 125K load will completely flatten out the resonance.

There is a direct physics analogy to this electrical network. It is the suspension system on a car. Have you ever rode in a car with the shock absorbers removed? It's actually quite funny. You hit a bump and the resonance between the spring and the mass of the car results in a natural frequency resonance. You go bouncing all over the place. The spring is analogous to to the capacitance, and the mass of the car is analogous to the inductance of the pickup. The shock absorber is the resistance. The resistance damps out the resonance. The volume pot is a damper.
__________________
Best regards,
Terry Downs http://terrydownsmusic.com
Equine quadrupeds may be coaxed to the reference of specific gravity but may not be compelled to imbibe thereof.
tdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 11:53 PM   #13 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
lostpick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Staten Island, NYC
Posts: 1,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdowns View Post
On a regular Tele bridge pickup, a 125K load will completely flatten out the resonance.
I have often wondered what a bridge pup would sound like
with a 150 k pot....anybody ever try this?
lostpick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1st, 2008, 11:56 PM   #14 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
alexpigment's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 333
i actually use 25k pots in my strat :)

i have no idea why it uses that, but it's got active pickups in it, so i guess it has something to do with that
alexpigment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 12:48 AM   #15 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
gtech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Quebec, Canada
Age: 59
Posts: 1,999
Active pickups have a built preamp in with a low Z output so that they are not affected by what they are connected to. So 25K is pretty much a standard for these active pickups.
__________________
Back to practice now...to make my Teles sound good.
gtech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 01:32 AM   #16 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick JD's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdowns View Post
That first statement makes no sense.

The second statement is false. There is negligible change in the lows among pot values. I've done the analysis and simulation to prove it. The "leak" word is used a lot in this topic, which is not really what is happening.

A resonance exists between the inductance of the pickup and the total capacitance of the cable and amp input (and tone network if dialed in). If there is no volume pot, or a very high resistance one, that resonance can be quite large. It is a peak in frequency response. This resonance is generally in the treble region around 3-4kHz. If a longer cable is used, and/or the inductance of the pickup is higher, this resonance can be tuned to more in the midrange spectrum. So, having a high resistance pot does not always mean a peak of highs, but it is peak somewhere in frequency. With a Tele and a nominal instrument cable and amp input capacitance, the resonance is almost inevitably in the treble region. When a lower resistance pot is used, the peak of that resonance is lowered. On a regular Tele bridge pickup, a 125K load will completely flatten out the resonance.

There is a direct physics analogy to this electrical network. It is the suspension system on a car. Have you ever rode in a car with the shock absorbers removed? It's actually quite funny. You hit a bump and the resonance between the spring and the mass of the car results in a natural frequency resonance. You go bouncing all over the place. The spring is analogous to to the capacitance, and the mass of the car is analogous to the inductance of the pickup. The shock absorber is the resistance. The resistance damps out the resonance. The volume pot is a damper.
I've read this three times and I think I finally have it: single coils don't need as big shocks as HBs. Or perhaps a smoother road?! Cheers Terry . Boo WDMusic . I thought I finally got the whole pot value thing there for a minute...
__________________
Nick JD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 11:10 AM   #17 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
FirstBassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,377

OK, this I almost understand this.
But I have a question I’m sure has been covered, so please forgive me.

If we simply state that 250k pots are for single-coils and 500k pots are for humbuckers, what is one supposed to use in a Telecaster that has only one volume pot, one tone pop but has one S/C and one H/B?

Thanks!
FirstBassman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 11:29 AM   #18 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
surfoverb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstBassman View Post

OK, this I almost understand this.
But I have a question I’m sure has been covered, so please forgive me.

If we simply state that 250k pots are for single-coils and 500k pots are for humbuckers, what is one supposed to use in a Telecaster that has only one volume pot, one tone pop but has one S/C and one H/B?

Thanks!
300K? I dunno...
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!"
surfoverb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 03:47 PM   #19 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Otter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nashville
Age: 21
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfoverb View Post
Thats why I use 1 million ohm pots...they are super powerfull!
I might have missed the joke, but a 1 meg pot is one million ohms, no?

meg(a)=million
k(ilo)=thousand
Otter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 04:01 PM   #20 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
surfoverb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otter View Post
I might have missed the joke, but a 1 meg pot is one million ohms, no?

meg(a)=million
k(ilo)=thousand
1 million sounds more powerfull than 1 meg.
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!"
surfoverb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 05:26 PM   #21 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
John Lipfert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 111
Since good quality CTS pots are cheap (five or six bucks) and easy to replace if you practice a little and have a decent soldering iron, I like to try both in a guitar before I pick one. One of my guitars, a Squier 51, has two humbuckers but is still a very bright guitar with a 250K pot. Another guitar with Fralin P-92s is a bit too mellow with 500K pots, but I'm going to replace the crappy bridge that's on it first before I tweak the electronics any more.
John Lipfert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 05:52 PM   #22 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 128
I use 500k pots, but my pickups are stacked humbuckers, so they need a bit of brightness.
rogerzilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 07:48 PM   #23 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
FirstBassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,377
I'm sorry to say I've never touched a soldering iron in my life.

I'm having the tech put the pups in.
Hopefully he'll know what to do.
FirstBassman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 2nd, 2008, 09:27 PM   #24 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Flat357's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 40
Posts: 2,913
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstBassman View Post
I'm sorry to say I've never touched a soldering iron in my life.

I'm having the tech put the pups in.
Hopefully he'll know what to do.
Get yourself an iron , a stand , and some solder and practise .

Here's one of many vids . You can fnd specific vids too .


Learning to solder will save you a lot of money , and get you out of the crap quickly in many situations .