|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: hazlet,Nj
Age: 21
Posts: 153
|
A question about 250k pots compared to 500k?
whats the difference, do the 500k give the guitar a better sounder sound cause if thats the case ill go with 500...its for a telecaster, is that truley the difference or is it for something else??? thanks
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,578
|
This says:
As a potentiometer is turned fully down, all of the signal from the pickup(s) is diverted to ground, resulting in no output from the instrument. When the potentiometer is turned up to full volume, the resistance of the potentiometer theoretically prevents any of the output signal leaking to ground, and weakening the output signal. Lower value pots, however, do not completely block the signal from leaking to ground even when turned up all the way, so using a 250k potentiometer will result in a slight loss of high frequency, as well as volume. This may please some musicians who want a mellower tone, but for those seeking ultimate purity of signal, a higher value potentiometer may be just what is needed. The higher the value, the more leakage is blocked from ground, which allows more of the signal to be sent to the output. A 500k pot may be just right, but a 1meg ohm pot will provide an all out sonic assault. Higher highs; lower lows; more volume - a rocker's dream! The only drawback of going to this higher value is the perceived range and sweep of the control. It's like going from 0 to 10 without the fine increments of control in between. The Telecaster® is a good example of potentiometers determining the overall sound of an electric instrument. The earliest Telecasters® utilized 1meg ohm potentiometers. They were deemed too bright to be practical for a wide range of musical styles. As a result, the potentiometers were changed to 250k to "bleed off" some of the extreme treble "twang" that the early versions were known and loved for (Stratocasters® also use 250k pots for the same reason). Some Gibson® laptop guitars had 5 meg ohm pots. Talk about bright! So the confusing thing about why a bigger number makes a "clearer" sound is because the pot naturally "leaks" some sound (to ground), so bigger number = better able to "resist" leaking - not extra resistance in the signal. But the difference between 1M pots and wired straight from the pickup to the jack isn't much.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 40
Posts: 2,913
|
Pots are cheap & easy to swap with a little knowledge .
Single coil pups generally use 250k , but there is no ' must use ' when it comes to instruments and amps . Smooth volume swells are also better with 250k in my opinion too . Buy a few of each and experiment , but if you are unsure , and have single coils , try 250k .
__________________
Homepage http://www.soundclick.com/members/de...member=flat357 MySpace http://www.myspace.com/flat357 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Age: 40
Posts: 946
|
FWIW I use a 250K pot with my Benedetto A6 equipped (in the neck) tele. I actually prefer the 250K pot on the bucker. But that might just be me.
__________________
Sorry, not the real Ed Bickert. Just a fan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Wylie, TX US
Posts: 2,673
|
Quote:
The second statement is false. There is negligible change in the lows among pot values. I've done the analysis and simulation to prove it. The "leak" word is used a lot in this topic, which is not really what is happening. A resonance exists between the inductance of the pickup and the total capacitance of the cable and amp input (and tone network if dialed in). If there is no volume pot, or a very high resistance one, that resonance can be quite large. It is a peak in frequency response. This resonance is generally in the treble region around 3-4kHz. If a longer cable is used, and/or the inductance of the pickup is higher, this resonance can be tuned to more in the midrange spectrum. So, having a high resistance pot does not always mean a peak of highs, but it is peak somewhere in frequency. With a Tele and a nominal instrument cable and amp input capacitance, the resonance is almost inevitably in the treble region. When a lower resistance pot is used, the peak of that resonance is lowered. On a regular Tele bridge pickup, a 125K load will completely flatten out the resonance. There is a direct physics analogy to this electrical network. It is the suspension system on a car. Have you ever rode in a car with the shock absorbers removed? It's actually quite funny. You hit a bump and the resonance between the spring and the mass of the car results in a natural frequency resonance. You go bouncing all over the place. The spring is analogous to to the capacitance, and the mass of the car is analogous to the inductance of the pickup. The shock absorber is the resistance. The resistance damps out the resonance. The volume pot is a damper.
__________________
Best regards, Terry Downs http://terrydownsmusic.com Equine quadrupeds may be coaxed to the reference of specific gravity but may not be compelled to imbibe thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Active pickups have a built preamp in with a low Z output so that they are not affected by what they are connected to. So 25K is pretty much a standard for these active pickups.
__________________
Back to practice now...to make my Teles sound good. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,578
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,377
|
OK, this I almost understand this. But I have a question I’m sure has been covered, so please forgive me. If we simply state that 250k pots are for single-coils and 500k pots are for humbuckers, what is one supposed to use in a Telecaster that has only one volume pot, one tone pop but has one S/C and one H/B? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
|
Quote:
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,889
|
Quote:
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Since good quality CTS pots are cheap (five or six bucks) and easy to replace if you practice a little and have a decent soldering iron, I like to try both in a guitar before I pick one. One of my guitars, a Squier 51, has two humbuckers but is still a very bright guitar with a 250K pot. Another guitar with Fralin P-92s is a bit too mellow with 500K pots, but I'm going to replace the crappy bridge that's on it first before I tweak the electronics any more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cheshire
Age: 40
Posts: 2,913
|
Quote:
Here's one of many vids . You can fnd specific vids too . Learning to solder will save you a lot of money , and get you out of the crap quickly in many situations .
__________________
Homepage http://www.soundclick.com/members/de...member=flat357 MySpace http://www.myspace.com/flat357 |
|
|
|