|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
NEW MEMBER!
Join Date: May 2008
Location: hasselt
Posts: 8
|
info about telecaster baja vs. thinline 72
hello my tele friends.
I have a problem i am going to buy a new tele and i am not shure which one to buy. i love the baja in desert sand and the thinline in sunburst but looks aren't everything the sound is the most important. who can tell me something about playability and the sounds of the 2 guitars. is it true the baja sounds darker?is the baja more versatile? can you play clean with the thinline humbuckers? people who own one of these guitars please help me out here . |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Age: 53
Posts: 470
|
Welcome to the forum! I never played a Thinline but own a Baja and couldn't be happier. It is the best combination of old/new features with a large spectrum of sounds. If you do a search here on 'Baja' you'll find lots of feedback - 99% very positive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 100
|
Just IMO, and keping in mind that I do not own either of these guitars (though I do have a MIM '69 RI thinline and a custom with a neck bucker)..:
I dare say that the Baja will do things that the 72 won't, that is, the thinline RI with the buckers and that bridge won't spank and twang the same way the baja will. Also, baja has the features to cover a LOT of tonal ground, many sounds in there to be had.. Definitely play both. Get the one that speak to you. On stats and features alone, and especially if this is your first tele (you didn't say), I'm leaning heaviliy towards recommending the baja. All the best, JR |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
I'd also strongly suggest you play both. In my experience, there are some GREAT Baja Teles out there, and some real dogs with issues ranging from heavy weight to bad fits & finishes & just general lack of quality control.
There's several threads here on both guitars- do a search & read on for days. Personally (I'm obviously biased), I'd suggest a Thinline! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 186
|
I've played many Baja's and I own a '72 Thinline.
I really like the neck on the Thinline. There is an almost Gibson-like margin for error on it. It frets really easy. These are oninions that are really particular to me, however, so YMMV. The pickups sound great clean, IMO. I use them pretty close to clean all the time and I use a lot of delay for a pretty wet sound (rockabilly slapback sound). That said, the Thinline has really bright pickups and not a broad spectrum of tones available. Also, there isn't a lot of options out there for pickups unless you want to get a pickguard that is routed for Gibson sized humbuckers or get your pups rewound. I think you obviously should have one of each, but I LOVE the Thinline. I mostly play rockabilly these days and it is great for that. My other single coil equiped tele is used for blues. So. . .as always. . . play them and let your left hand decide.* *Unless you're a lefty, then let your right hand decide. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Age: 55
Posts: 46
|
thuwie,
The 72'ri Thinline is a great guitar, sounds great plugged right into the amp or through pedals. I own this guitar along with a 52'ri and a Muddy Waters. I have grabbed a number of Baja off the racks at GC, most were too heavy and poorly setup to keep me interested. See if you can try a MW, you might like it alot. Scott |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 8,521
|
Quote:
Clean with the Thinline pups? Maybe a little; the Thinline is a snazzy escape from the usual rules of the Telecaster, and it is playable if you like fairly thin necks, but I find it isn't quite a Tele, sound wise. It reminds me of a childhood pal who was all hopped up to buy a new big block Camaro and came home somehow with a beautiful 68 Corvair. Neat little car, but I didn't know that was what he wanted.
__________________
Bubban0v |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
I don't think the heavy weight of some Baja's is their biggest issue at all, but the ones I've loved tended not to be boat anchors.
Both of these guitars are very versatile. A big factor to consider in your decision is maybe the type of music you play or tone you're going for. If you want a more traditional Tele twang sound, the Baja may be a better fit... whereas Thinlines are great for rock and blues. As long as you get a good Baja you really can't go wrong either way, but again... I'd strongly encourage you to play both guitars before buying. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
The two a fairly different. My thinline has become my #1 player and I never expected that. I really like it a lot.
Again, like my fellow members here, I say play them both and figure out what you intend to play with it. baja = twang thinline = no twang
__________________
"Don't play what's there, play what's not there.” Miles Davis |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.