|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Telecaster Discussion Forum The world's largest Fender Telecaster Discussion Forum. Please keep discussion limited to Telecaster topics here. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,462
|
Laying another couple of myths to rest, (again).
I was at GC today and played two seemingly identical Vintage Hot Rod '52 Telecasters.
The Deluxe Reverb was warming up so I started strumming. The first one had a really big acoustic sound and a nice, snappy feel. Strings were good, guitar was up to pitch, so I threw the standby switch to the "on" position. The guitar sounded good. The mini-humbucker is a really nice addition to this guitar and doesn't overpower the the bridge p'up. Then I picked up the second one. While I was tuning it with an electronic tuner, I noticed that it was dull and lifeless sounding. In fact, it didn't seem to have any snap at all. The strings were fair and the set up was decent but it was just dull sounding. I plugged it in. Va Voooooooom! It sparkled and sang and just plain flattened the one I had previously played! In the interest of science, I asked a couple of other people what they thought and it was unanimous. The Tele that sounded the worst acoustically, flat out smoked the resonant one. Oh, and the second myth? "The wood has nothing to do with the sound. It's all in the pickups." In this case, the wood truly play a HUGE role in the sound. These two guitars sounded like they were made by two different manufacturers to completely different specs. I couldn't believe they were identical guitars! Anyway, I didn't buy either. I was just shopping around and thought I'd give 'em a rip! There ya have it.
__________________
Dogs have the right idea! |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
|
Your little comparison test definitely proves something that many here seem to have lost sight of ................ Electric guitars are meant to be played through amplifiers.
__________________
Jack's Disclaimer: When I say something.... always ask yourself ..... "What the hell does he know?" _ ![]() Guys - learn to disable the flash on your digital cameras. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Age: 61
Posts: 4,359
|
Quote:
If one had been ash (great sounding), and one alder (not quite that great sounding) - would your conclusion be that ash is superiour as a body wood? ![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,462
|
Quote:
My thoughts exactly. I didn't set out to do a test, I was just playing two guitars that were manufactured by Fender to be identical. They were there right next to eachother to I figured, what the heck. Then I went and played some acoustic guitars, but I didn't judge their acoustic performance by first plugging them in.
__________________
Dogs have the right idea! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,462
|
Quote:
The point is, two identical guitars sounded completely different acoustically and plugged in. The one with the loudest acoutic resonance was actually the less desirable of the two when plugged in. People seem to put an awful lot of importance on acoustic resonance when buying a guitar. It would be a shame if they bought the one I played because when you plugged it in, it got smoked by the acoustically dead one.
__________________
Dogs have the right idea! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 58
Posts: 12,468
|
The species of wood doesnt matter but the way the woods in the neck and body match up is what makes it sound good or bad.
Its hard to make people believe a dead dull lifeless electric solidbody guitar unpluged can sound better plugged in than another one of the same model thats way louder acousticly. But it is the truth. There are so many people who have bought electric solidbodies just because they played louder than other ones of the same model without ever pluged them in. To me thats kinda like sitting in a car on the showroom floor and say I'll takr that one without ever driving it to see how it handles. Its funny how all the things that are true on an acoustic guitar have been added to electric guitar. Kinda like trying to convince someone that ugly gals kiss better than pretty ones. Its not easy!! LOL
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norway
Age: 61
Posts: 4,359
|
Quote:
But since I'm playing my guitars mostly acoustically these days |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
I think this lays to rest the myth that a lively sounding unplugged guitar will sound livelier and more resonant than a dull sounding unplugged guitar.
It's always been my opinion that acoustically dead sounding elec guits sound better through an amp because there's nothing on the guitar resonating with the strings, eating up string energy. More volume, sustain and depth. Lively sounding unplugged electrics sound "deader" through an amp because that resonance you're hearing is caused by energy absorbed from the string vibes, and being re-voiced through the guit body. That resonance does not get "heard" by the pups, but it subtracts substantially from the total amount of string vibration energy available to be heard by the pups. Highly microphonic pups change the equation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 178
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Bakersfield Ca.
Age: 58
Posts: 12,468
|
Would anyone here buy a new TV set without plugging it in to see the picture?
Thats the same as playing an electric guitar unplugged to see how it sounds. Does anyone buy a new pair of shoes without trying them on first? ELECTRIC guitar needs to be hooked up to see how it sounds. Johnny Cochran might have said the way an electric guitar acousticly rings doesnt mean a thing. LOL
__________________
I'm so blind my seeing eye dog needs glasses. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bloomfield, Connecticut
Age: 55
Posts: 581
|
I don't even trust my ears - I bring Telenator with me and get him to check them out with me - we've done good so far!
__________________
The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese... |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Were the pups the same height? Was the set up to the same specs? There's two questions that makes a HUGE difference when they're PLUGGED in......
__________________
*{disclaimer} It's like EVERYTHING else on this entire forum, it boils down to what YOU choose, to suit you. If the human mind was a simple thing to understand, we would be too simple to understand it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Poster Extraordinaire
|
I think the myth that this dispels is that you can't have fun at Guitar Center. You disproved that! And maybe that everyone's opinion at Guitar Center is bad...
The other part.... doesn't work for me... First, I have no bias or opinion about wood or pickups... I don't care... I play'em, if they sound good, cool. But, here you have several variables still... the first guitar didn't sound good acoustically, but sounded best plugged in. The second, sounded good acoustically and sounded not nearly as good plugged in. This proves precisely nothing about wood. The acoustic-ness of the two guitars could have been from a whole range of variables and likely had zero to do with the slab of dead tree. I'm all for dispelling myths but not by using non science... I do think it is awesome that you liked the hot rod... I think those are pretty good guitars!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 7,557
|
I think the amp and the two guitars were in league together, conspiring to mess with the minds of any hapless human that walked in to the shop that day.
or The resonant guitar and the DRRI were made of incompatible materials, and thus did not sound good together. The resonant one happens to sound great through the AC30.
__________________
Bubban0v |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Portsmouth, U.K.
Age: 44
Posts: 180
|
Cool info, I wondered why I have been seeing in recent eBay ads that a Les Paul or Stratocaster is smonking acoustically. I thought "what the heck"
, now I know what they mean. I'll stick to plugging mine in.This myth can along with the 90's one that Gibson uses Lion piss for the glue in their cases. freddie |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,462
|
Quote:
__________________
Dogs have the right idea! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Rupertsland
Age: 48
Posts: 641
|
Quote:
1) That's funny, the only time I play a tele unplugged is when your girlfriend is trying to tell me something. 2) Yeah, I know what you mean. At least my wife waits till I finish the song.
__________________
Higgy |
|
|
|
|