The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
fender telecaster electric guitar discussion forum
Make a donation with PayPal Telecaster Guitars at Ebay

Supporting Vendors
Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals dallenpickups.com Tommy Guitars Warmoth.com
advertise on the tdpri 


   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Tele-Technical
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Notices

Tele-Technical Telecaster nuts and bolts talk ONLY

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 1st, 2006, 04:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
NOS Nocaster gets a shave

Well, I did it. After finally coming to terms with the fact that big ol' baseball Nocaster neck isn't to my liking, I shaved it down. I shaped it to be similar to my NOS '60 Strat, which I love.

Guys, I know it's heresy, but for me, and I'll bet for many (who can get past the machismo appeal of the fat neck), it's a vast improvement in feel and tone. It seemed to clarify the sound and boost the twang factor with NO loss of sustain (which you might presume). To me, this neck shave yielded as big a tonal improvement as a good pickup change. To my ears, nothing was tonally compromised by the transformation.

By the way, I have Fred Stuarts in this baby and my belief in his pups has just taken another step up. That big ol' chunk of wood was hampering the tone, in my book. I just thought I'd throw this out here for guys, for whatever it's worth.

slincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads   #
Sponsored posting
 
 
Join Date: March, 2003
Location: Forum HQ
Posts: N/A
Sponsored by...

Google is online  
Old February 1st, 2006, 04:54 PM   #2 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
ThermionicScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SW CR IA US NA PE
Age: 32
Posts: 5,156
Hey, wood isn't 100% predictable. What matters is that you enjoy your guitar now. :)
ThermionicScott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2006, 05:01 PM   #3 (permalink)
GTO
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Peak District
Posts: 775
Quote:
(who can get past the machismo appeal of the fat neck),
Mmmm, thats telling us. Do what you want, its your guitar. But are you sure the superb new twang factor and killer tone wasn't just the new set of strings? Rock on.
GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2006, 06:41 PM   #4 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
Jack Wells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 18,387
What method of shaving it down did you use?
__________________
.

Disclaimer: When I say something.... always ask yourself ..... "What the hell does he know?"
I'm just not cool enough to be a Mac person.
I'm a PC and Windows 7 was my idea.
Jack Wells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2006, 07:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Northern California
Posts: 100
Re: NOS Nocaster gets a shave

Quote:
Originally Posted by slincoln
Guys, I know it's heresy, but for me, and I'll bet for many (who can get past the machismo appeal of the fat neck), it's a vast improvement in feel and tone.
Hi,

I'm glad you got a guitar adjusted to your liking. However, big necks aren't all machismo. I get hand pain while gigging with a guitar that has a small wood cross-sectional area. (It can't be a small nut width AND be small from front to back, however I have 1 3/4" nut width guitars that don't bother me if they are a little thinner front to back.) So, for me, a slightly bigger neck is a necessity. Plus, I think they feel really good.

But, then again, I like a gloss finish on the back of the neck, so I guess I'm weird...

-Garrett
__________________
____

"Nothing but the best for my dog." - Frank Zappa
fractal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2006, 09:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
mellecaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Desperadoville..USA
Posts: 13,659
I Disagree with just about everything you stated....but I'm glad it went well for you......and that you're Happy 8)
mellecaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2006, 10:43 PM   #7 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
I actually didn't change strings for this venture, so the difference I heard was simply related to the trimmed off wood. My reason for doing this post was to comment on the factor of neck mass to tone. As I found, it seems to be pretty substantial. Oh yeah, I also removed most of the laquer from it a long time ago. That, too, was a real upgrade to the tone. All that glop Fender drowns their necks in is a real tonesucker.
slincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 1st, 2006, 11:04 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
sabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 295
I had a fatback on a Strat that I tried to sand down to a boatneck. I should have known I'd end up with something else. Anyway, the neck was thinner than I planned, though still very nice (reverse taper, hard V to C). I think the tone suffered a tad (a little less across the frequency spectrum). FWIW.
sabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 01:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
GUITARmole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,167
Besides the fact that I just like the way they feel, I think that a fat neck really contributes to tone and sustain.

I'm glad your neck shave turned out OK for you though.
GUITARmole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 03:48 AM   #10 (permalink)
GTO
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Peak District
Posts: 775
"That, too, was a real upgrade to the tone. All that glop Fender drowns their necks in is a real tonesucker"

It just gets better. Be very careful what you say from now on. Eric Johnson will be wanting your ears. I understand he has been looking for a spare set. So don't accept any cheap holiday's out of the country.....

That aside, come on, the Custom Shop do not 'drown' necks in 'glop'. I think you are now protesting to much for dramatic effect, or whatever, but any truth in your original statement is starting to ebb away.
GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 04:11 AM   #11 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Nick Fanis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Athens-GREECE
Posts: 2,410
You can HEAR the difference between a finished & an unfinished NECK,on an electric guitar through an amp ?

Are you sure your name isn't SUPERMAN??
__________________
"Hit him again Jack,he is crazy!"


http://superfunk12.com/
Nick Fanis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 07:44 AM   #12 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 48
He means when you use the neck for percussion, duh.
The Doctor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 06:21 PM   #13 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
Dadgum, I'm feeling the love out there. :D
slincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 07:04 PM   #14 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
Jack Wells's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque, USA
Age: 69
Posts: 18,387
Well ............ I'll ask it again.

What method of shaving it down did you use?
__________________
.

Disclaimer: When I say something.... always ask yourself ..... "What the hell does he know?"
I'm just not cool enough to be a Mac person.
I'm a PC and Windows 7 was my idea.
Jack Wells is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 07:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
sabby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by slincoln
Dadgum, I'm feeling the love out there. :D
Sorry about the slincoln. I only meant to suggest that wood is mysterious. I don't doubt your results.

jwells393: You didn't ask me, but I'll say anyway. I used coarse sandpaper on a hard block (carefully) followed by fine sanding sponges. I'm surprised how even it came out. The transition to headstock and heel isn'e as sharp as production necks, bit that says more about the sander technician than the technique, I'd figure.
sabby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 2nd, 2006, 09:17 PM   #16 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
stevieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the valley
Age: 62
Posts: 5,674
Hey, machismo is in the fingers!!!
__________________
"... I'm gonna show you the inside of me." Albert Collins
stevieboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2006, 12:57 AM   #17 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
jwells393, I just used a good knife, cutting with the grain, in even strokes (blade angled back), and used various grades of sandpaper to get it to the desired shape. It was a fairly slow process that allowed me to avoid any sudden disasters.

My apologies to any who might have felt a nerve struck with my initial "machismo" comment. If you've played an NOS Nocaster, for any length of time, it's a big honker of a neck. Over the course of a night, it became tedious for me. Mind you, I have some rather large necks on other guitars that work well for me. I more feel like it was a combination of the bulk plus the triangular shape that finally did me in with it.
slincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2006, 03:28 AM   #18 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
stevieboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: the valley
Age: 62
Posts: 5,674
You might as well get em the way you want em. Personally I have a wide range of neck sizes and while i would answer "thick" in a neck size preference poll I enjoy playing them all.

While I am 100% on the fence when it comes to the neck size-to-tone debate, your impression I guess would fit in with those that believe that a thicker neck equals a fatter tone, with more twang being the opposing result of a thinner neck. I've read those debates and the two opinions are always either a thicker neck gives a fatter tone, or it has no effect. So your comments are interesting in that they present another perspective.
__________________
"... I'm gonna show you the inside of me." Albert Collins
stevieboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 3rd, 2006, 08:20 AM   #19 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 91
Quote:
Originally Posted by stevieboy
I guess would fit in with those that believe that a thicker neck equals a fatter tone, with more twang being the opposing result of a thinner neck.

stevieboy, I think you are right. I gather that Broadcasters have thick necks, much like the Nocaster. It makes me feel that the Broadcaster tone may owe a bit to the neck girth.
slincoln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 7th, 2006, 09:30 PM   #20 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Deacon Blues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern New Mexico
Posts: 560
Why didn't you just buy a good aftermarket neck?

Personally, I wouldn't mess with a Nocaster neck. I think they are perfect. Very comfy compared to a modern "C" shape neck.
You changed pups, too? Someone get a rope! A new stiff, scratchy rope! :evil:
__________________
This is the age of the expanding man.
Deacon Blues is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump




IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved.