The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
fender telecaster electric guitar discussion forum
Make a donation with PayPal Telecaster Guitars at Ebay

Supporting Vendors
Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals dallenpickups.com Tommy Guitars Warmoth.com
advertise on the tdpri 


   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Tele-Technical
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Notices

Tele-Technical Telecaster nuts and bolts talk ONLY

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 26th, 2012, 08:34 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,952
Keystone neck pickup fitment

I picked up a set of the Keystone pups based on all the good reviews and I plan on putting them into a partscaster I'm working on. No holes have been drilled at this point other than the string-thou holes and I planned on vintage specs.

My question concerns the neck pickup fit and whether it can be done by mounting it to the body instead of through the pickguard. A dry fit makes it seem like the potted in wires coming out the back of the pup won't allow the pickup to sit deeply enough into the cavity to work, whether body mounted or pickguard mounted. I don't have a guard with pickup mounting screws drilled into it to try fitting it that way. Does the pickup cavity need a small counterbore drilled beneath the wires in some Tele bodies?

Has anybody had this issue with the Keystone neck pup or do you know what the standard depth of the neck pickup route should be on a Tele? I suppose the body I bought could be slightly out of spec, but real Fender pickguards, control plates, and the bridge all seem to fit/align perfectly so I suspect the body is pretty much '50s spec. I could tear apart my other Tele, though I'm hoping that somebody else knows the answers.

milocj is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads   #
Sponsored posting
 
 
Join Date: March, 2003
Location: Forum HQ
Posts: N/A
Sponsored by...

Google is online  
Old June 26th, 2012, 08:49 PM   #2 (permalink)
Telefied
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 30,186
Now, I'm gonna talk about the "non-deluxe" version because that's what I've fooled with.

Each Keystone T neck pup has fitted well, either pickguard or body mounted, no interference issues underneath at all.

Either your rout is not deep enough, or you're proposing to mount the pickup too low. And I've set mine so low, the top was level with the pickguard so that is very low.

The thing I most noticed (other than no cover, which one expects) is the form of the pickup is larger than an ordinary T pickup and fits through the pickguard neck pup opening with only the tiniest room to spare.
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 27th, 2012, 11:58 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,952
That's the version I have. A dry fit showed it way proud of the pickguard, though I was also afraid to bend the wires exiting the back of the epoxy too much at this point in time.

I guess I'll have to pull a pickguard off of one of my other Teles and see if I can stick a six inch steel rule between the pup and rout to measure the depth. No issues with the bridge pup, though the form barely comes through the bridge plate, just like you mentioned the neck pickup is with the guard.
milocj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 27th, 2012, 12:05 PM   #4 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Norfolk UK
Age: 65
Posts: 4,474
The Chrome Keystone are deeper than a standard tele neck pickup .more like a Texas Special .I had a similar problem with a parts caster and fitted a pickguard mount instead .It pulled it up just enough to make it adjustable .
musicalmartin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 27th, 2012, 09:57 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,952
Well, I left my steel rule at work and only had a few minutes with a tape to take some quick measurements. I have the black Keystones with exposed poles and the neck pup measures just shy of 13/16" not counting the small bit of wire that remains stiff before being able to bend them into the wiring hole to the control cavity. All of my other neck pups are in guitars right now, but from the above post it sounds like this is a bit taller than most, but not all, Tele neck pups and would work in a standard cavity.

My bridge pup cavity eyeballs at about 3/4" deep using the tape measure, and the neck pup cavity and neck pocket both seem to be about 5/8" deep. Does that sound about right for a Fender spec body or are the bridge and neck pickup cavities usually the same depth?

I'm sure that my other Teles probably have the neck pup about 3/16" proud of the pickguard, but those still have a little room for springs and the wires underneath and can be lowered close to flush.

If I need to deepen the cavity I would prefer to do it before I paint the body, though I may break down and just swap the Keystones into the Highway One for the time being and I can take measurements from that body while I have things apart.

Thanks a bunch for the info already provided.
milocj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2012, 07:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
nadzab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Age: 45
Posts: 2,145
Had no problems with this one, MIM Standard, pickup mounted to the body.

nadzab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2012, 08:15 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,952
Nice looking guitar. Did you use springs underneath or tubing? I can't imagine there being enough room to get tubing to compress beneath the pup on the body I have these slated for.

I did find T Downs' Tele blueprint and my pockets match the dimensions on his "vintage" blueprint so I guess I'll be alright if I carefully work the pickup leads into as sharp a bend as possible to get me a touch more room.

Either that, or the newer bodies have a little bit deeper neck cavity than a '50s spec. I'll probably pop the Highway One open out if curiosity next time I change strings since that will probably be before I get the finish on this body.

Thanks again.
milocj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2012, 05:25 PM   #8 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
nadzab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Age: 45
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by milocj View Post
Nice looking guitar. Did you use springs underneath or tubing? I can't imagine there being enough room to get tubing to compress beneath the pup on the body I have these slated for.

I did find T Downs' Tele blueprint and my pockets match the dimensions on his "vintage" blueprint so I guess I'll be alright if I carefully work the pickup leads into as sharp a bend as possible to get me a touch more room.

Either that, or the newer bodies have a little bit deeper neck cavity than a '50s spec. I'll probably pop the Highway One open out if curiosity next time I change strings since that will probably be before I get the finish on this body.

Thanks again.
Thanks - I don't remember whether I used springs - I seem to recall using a small block of foam under the flatwork on this one.
nadzab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2012, 09:32 AM   #9 (permalink)
Telefied
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 30,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by nadzab View Post
Thanks - I don't remember whether I used springs - I seem to recall using a small block of foam under the flatwork on this one.
Bill has suggested I not do that.

I'd tried foam, then screwed the pickup into the body and got squeal. I was twisting the flatwork, creating voids at the ends between the base and the rest of the pickup. I reaffixed the pickup using tubing beneath the mount points and all was cured.
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2012, 11:54 AM   #10 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,952
Do you remember off hand what size screws are used for body mounting the neck pup? I don't have any spares and it comes with screws that thread into the pickup for pickguard mounting. If I remember correctly I had to find a "real" hardware store last time and couldn't get them at HD or Lowe's.
milocj is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2012, 07:14 PM   #11 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
nadzab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England
Age: 45
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by boris bubbanov View Post
Bill has suggested I not do that.

I'd tried foam, then screwed the pickup into the body and got squeal. I was twisting the flatwork, creating voids at the ends between the base and the rest of the pickup. I reaffixed the pickup using tubing beneath the mount points and all was cured.
Hmmm, no squealing, so maybe I'm thinking of another guitar...a P-Bass I used to have, perhaps? I would pop the pickguard off to check, but I've got some double-sided tape under there to prevent warping and would rather not mess with it unless absolutely necessary.

Quote:
Originally Posted by milocj View Post
Do you remember off hand what size screws are used for body mounting the neck pup? I don't have any spares and it comes with screws that thread into the pickup for pickguard mounting. If I remember correctly I had to find a "real" hardware store last time and couldn't get them at HD or Lowe's.
These should work, see part no. 3358:

http://www.stewmac.com/shop/Hardware...ht_Screws.html
nadzab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump




IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved.