The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
fender telecaster electric guitar discussion forum
Make a donation with PayPal Telecaster Guitars at Ebay

Supporting Vendors
Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals dallenpickups.com Tommy Guitars Warmoth.com
advertise on the tdpri 


   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Tele-Technical
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Notices

Tele-Technical Telecaster nuts and bolts talk ONLY

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 28th, 2010, 08:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Boolywho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 450
4-way switch disadvantages?

I was wondering if there are any disadvantages to using a 4-way switch on a two pickup tele (as compared to the traditional 3-way switch setup).

I figure if I have the choice while building my guitar between the standard 3-way switch and a 4-way switch, that enables me to put the two pickups in series (in addition to everything else), then this is a no brainer... I should do it.

Is this being naive? Are there disadvantages to this setup that I'm not aware of (like more potential for noise, not being able to flick the switch as rapidly when trying to get to the neck position alone, etc...)? Thanks for your help!

Boolywho is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads   #
Sponsored posting
 
 
Join Date: March, 2003
Location: Forum HQ
Posts: N/A
Sponsored by...

Google is online  
Old November 28th, 2010, 09:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Age: 62
Posts: 5,958
It gives you a distinct fourth sound, similar to the combined-parallel sound except fatter and 3dB louder. No downside IMO. I have 4-ways on 2 of my three teles. I have to admit I'm in no hurry to replace my last 3-way.
__________________
Dim lights, thick smoke, and loud, loud music.
It's the only kind of life you'll ever understand.
Dim lights, thick smoke, and loud, loud music.
You'll never make a wife to a home lovin' man.
Ricky D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28th, 2010, 09:17 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
kddean66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmond, OK
Age: 47
Posts: 887
None.
kddean66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 28th, 2010, 11:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
porknblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Bend, IN
Posts: 623
I've heard some comment that it is difficult to get position three on the fly for neck only now that its not on the end of the throw.

I have two with the 4-way mod and I like the new tone provided in position 4.
__________________
"I was right! Everything I knew was wrong!"
porknblue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:18 AM   #5 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
SatelliteOrders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lafayette, IN
Age: 43
Posts: 2,047
I spend more time in pos. 4 than 1-3 these days.
__________________
I told my wife "Let that boy boogie-woogie, 'cause it's in him and it has to come out."
She had no clue what I was on about.
SatelliteOrders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:26 AM   #6 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
morroben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Morro Bay, Ca
Age: 36
Posts: 4,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatelliteOrders View Post
I spend more time in pos. 4 than 1-3 these days.
Me too. No disadvantage that I've found.
__________________
Life is a ii V I. Tension and resolution.
morroben is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 06:20 AM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Colchester, England, UK
Posts: 1,169
Well yes, neck pup alone is obviously more difficult to select in a hurry, but then all mid positions would be too.
For me, it actually would make more sense if it could be wired with the both pups on positions in the middle, leaving both extremities of travel for bridge/ neck.
Guitarmadcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 07:01 AM   #8 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Sollophonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Skipton, N. Yorkshire, England
Age: 48
Posts: 2,275
I'm the other way round, I'd like a setting so that you have the thicker series sound on the back position of the switch, with the usual tele switching on the other three.

Dont forget though, that you can also wire a three way to give the series setting in the middle. I have done that on two of my Teles, as I hardly ever use the two pickups in parallel setting anyway.
Sollophonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 07:12 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
tedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 7th Galaxy
Age: 59
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sollophonic View Post
Dont forget though, that you can also wire a three way to give the series setting in the middle. I have done that on two of my Teles, as I hardly ever use the two pickups in parallel setting anyway.
the standard tele middle is pretty darn distinctive. how different is this sound from that?
i haven't heard (online) a real good example yet.
tedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 11:29 AM   #10 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Agave_Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by porknblue View Post
I've heard some comment that it is difficult to get position three on the fly for neck only now that its not on the end of the throw.

....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guitarmadcat View Post
Well yes, neck pup alone is obviously more difficult to select in a hurry, but then all mid positions would be too.
For me, it actually would make more sense if it could be wired with the both pups on positions in the middle, leaving both extremities of travel for bridge/ neck.

I prefer to have the bridge only at one end and neck only at the other.

Spacially this makes the most sense to me, and there is no question/confusion/difficulty in quickly selecting either one - just throw the switch to the proper end.

:shrug:
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Franklin
Beer is proof that God loves us and want us to be happy.
Agave_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:21 PM   #11 (permalink)
Banned
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Colchester, England, UK
Posts: 1,169
I prefer to have the bridge only at one end and neck only at the other.

Spacially this makes the most sense to me, and there is no question/confusion/difficulty in quickly selecting either one - just throw the switch to the proper end.

:shrug

Agave Blue, I think you have lost the thread . . .
Guitarmadcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:27 PM   #12 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Colfax Ca.
Posts: 909
The only other problem I've found is that because the length of the switch throw is a bit longer it means that when the switch is in the bridge position it's really close to the volume knob. It's sometimes tricky to grab the switch in that position.

Grabbing the neck pickup position can be tricky as people have mentioned. But both of these are issues with the physical switch, not the sounds. I love having 4 main sounds from my Tele.

The solution to both problems may be to have use 3 way switch and then have a push/pull switch on the volume knob to go from series to parallel.
__________________
I hope the aliens judge us by the fact that we have television. Not by what we put on television.
GregB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Agave_Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guitarmadcat View Post
Agave Blue, I think you have lost the thread . . .




I thought this is what you thought would "make more sense if it could be" done? It does and it can - that's precisely how mine is wired.



I don't know why anyone would wire it any other way.


__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Franklin
Beer is proof that God loves us and want us to be happy.
Agave_Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:44 PM   #14 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
cactusrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Georgia
Age: 47
Posts: 1,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by SatelliteOrders View Post
I spend more time in pos. 4 than 1-3 these days.
+1

Same here....
cactusrob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 12:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
JCBurke59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 53
Posts: 738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Guitarmadcat View Post
Well yes, neck pup alone is obviously more difficult to select in a hurry, but then all mid positions would be too.
For me, it actually would make more sense if it could be wired with the both pups on positions in the middle, leaving both extremities of travel for bridge/ neck.
Mine is wired that way - bridge / b+n(P) / b+n(S) / neck.
Here's a diagram:

http://www.acmeguitarworks.com/Asset..._Alternate.pdf

And I completely agree - this made the most sense to me, also.
__________________
all partscasters, all the time...
JCBurke59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:05 PM   #16 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
SimpleOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cloud
Posts: 2,236
.....
SimpleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:07 PM   #17 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
SimpleOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cloud
Posts: 2,236
....duplicate....
SimpleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:07 PM   #18 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
SimpleOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cloud
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCBurke59 View Post
I completely agree - this made the most sense to me, also.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agave_Blue View Post
I don't know why anyone would wire it any other way.
+1, works for me...thanks again Rob D. for sharing this a while ago...
SimpleOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:44 PM   #19 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
Vizcaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Glen Head, NY
Posts: 2,525
I don't see any drawbacks, but if there's a "gee I wish I'd known that" moment, it has to do with installing the switch. Some control plates don't have a long enough slot for the four-way switch, so you'll have to modify the plate or the neck of the switch in order to get the full throw. Like I said it's not a drawback but it might be an extra step, or you could be more careful in picking out plates (I went with a nickel plate that doesn't fit the four way without cutting a notch in the switch shaft).
__________________
"Why don't you just make 10 louder, and make 10 be the top number, and make that a little louder?"
Vizcaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 29th, 2010, 01:46 PM   #20 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Age: 62
Posts: 5,958
I don't think those "lightning fast" selector switch changes are important at all. I've never seen a performance where I felt the song was adversely affected by the guitarist occasionally adjusting the controls on the guitar. Just reach over and do it, then play some more.

It's just like playing a bad note, except not as bad. If you don't make a big deal about it, it's long gone before anybody react. Of course, if you do it a lot, you're doing it too much, and you will look bad.
__________________
Dim lights, thick smoke, and loud, loud music.
It's the only kind of life you'll ever understand.
Dim lights, thick smoke, and loud, loud music.
You'll never make a wife to a home lovin' man.
Ricky D. is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump




IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved.