The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
fender telecaster electric guitar discussion forum
Make a donation with PayPal Telecaster Guitars at Ebay

Supporting Vendors
Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals dallenpickups.com Tommy Guitars Warmoth.com
advertise on the tdpri 


   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Main Telecaster Forum > Tele-Technical
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Notices

Tele-Technical Telecaster nuts and bolts talk ONLY

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 10th, 2009, 08:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
appar111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Age: 37
Posts: 2,703
lightweight body - thin neck or thick neck?

I'm putting together a strat that is pretty lightweight (a 3 lb. 1 oz. poplar body) and wondered if it would do better with a thick neck. I read (on TDPRI, I think) that a lightweight body sounds better paired up with a beefier neck. Better resonance between the mass of a thicker neck and the light body, perhaps?

I'm at the point where I'll be ordering a neck soon, and I'm down to either an SRO-FAT/SMO-FAT strat neck (i.e. ballbat profile) or the SRO/SMO (which is a medium C profile, 12" radius and jumbo frets).

The guitar in question will be for rock (dual humbucker, rear routed--i.e. no pickguard), so the 12" radius and jumbo frets would be welcomed, but I can definitely hang w/ the Allparts FAT neck as I have one on my esquire.

So, with such a light body, will the overall tone/sustain of the guitar be noticeably better with the fat neck over the more traditional one?

appar111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Ads   #
Sponsored posting
 
 
Join Date: March, 2003
Location: Forum HQ
Age:
Posts: N/A
Sponsored by...

Google is online  
Old January 10th, 2009, 10:17 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto
Age: 57
Posts: 1,003
Yes, I think. With a real dramatic weight contrast, you might be courting neck dive without, say, repositioning your bottom strap pin a little.
pbenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2009, 10:29 PM   #3 (permalink)
Telefied
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 30,186
If you are selecting a body so light that a 525 gram TMO or SMO-FAT will give you neck dive, respectfully, you are putting your priorities in the wrong place. The right neck comes first; Any body that is too light for use with the best necks is of no value to me - except to sell it to someone who doesn't agree, I guess.
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 10th, 2009, 10:46 PM   #4 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
appar111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Age: 37
Posts: 2,703
I guess the question is--- is a 3 lb. 1 oz. body too light for the SRO-FAT neck? I'll be putting a 57/62 Reissue strat trem on this one (the one with the full size steel block), so that should add a few extra ounces to the body end. Plus I'll just go w/ Gotoh klusons to keep the weight down at the headstock end.

I've seen a few 3 lb. strat and teles on Revelator, etc. that use the big fat necks. I wouldn't think that they'd put a neck on a body that would cause it to neck dive, since they care so much about the overall feel, tone & balance of the instrument.
appar111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2009, 07:06 AM   #5 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Rob DiStefano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Park Ridge, NJ
Age: 67
Posts: 7,728
No brainer - we play off the neck/frets - pick out the neck first, the body last.

FWIW, I routinely assemble 2.4#-3.2# Thinline bodies with large TMO-FAT necks and Gotoh staggered vintage tuners - never had any "neck diving" syndrome. If I did, a few ounces of fishing sinker lead epoxied in the body or control cavity does a fine balancing act.
Rob DiStefano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2009, 09:19 AM   #6 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
appar111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Age: 37
Posts: 2,703
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob DiStefano View Post
No brainer - we play off the neck/frets - pick out the neck first, the body last.

FWIW, I routinely assemble 2.4#-3.2# Thinline bodies with large TMO-FAT necks and Gotoh staggered vintage tuners - never had any "neck diving" syndrome. If I did, a few ounces of fishing sinker lead epoxied in the body or control cavity does a fine balancing act.
Well, I already have the body, so I can't go the "neck first, body last" route. If you've assembled some sub-3 lb. teles with the Allparts FAT necks with Gotoh vintage tuners without problem, then it looks like I should be ok!

Do you find that strat bodies are more or less balanced than a tele body? A tele is such a beautiful slab of wood, and the strat is just much more refined, curvy, etc. I'm still mainly a tele guy, but I'm starting to see the advantages of the strat body shape & contour.
appar111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2009, 09:24 AM   #7 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Rob DiStefano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Park Ridge, NJ
Age: 67
Posts: 7,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by appar111 View Post
Well, I already have the body, so I can't go the "neck first, body last" route.

Of course you can - pick the *right* neck and use it on the body you have - that was my point, don't be concerned with the body.

If you've assembled some sub-3 lb. teles with the Allparts FAT necks with Gotoh vintage tuners without problem, then it looks like I should be ok!

You'll be OK, one way or another/

Do you find that strat bodies are more or less balanced than a tele body? A tele is such a beautiful slab of wood, and the strat is just much more refined, curvy, etc. I'm still mainly a tele guy, but I'm starting to see the advantages of the strat body shape & contour.

They're all good, they're all excellent tools of the trade.
........
Rob DiStefano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2009, 12:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Jeffscreamedcorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: beantown
Age: 56
Posts: 830
For what it's worth, this body is a one piece swamp ash, and weighs 2 1/2 lbs. The neck is a USA Custom that is a baseball bat. The guitar is balanced and is super resonant.

Jeffscreamedcorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2009, 04:57 PM   #9 (permalink)
Telefied
 
boris bubbanov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 30,186
Quote:
Originally Posted by appar111 View Post

Do you find that strat bodies are more or less balanced than a tele body? A tele is such a beautiful slab of wood, and the strat is just much more refined, curvy, etc. I'm still mainly a tele guy, but I'm starting to see the advantages of the strat body shape & contour.
The Strat upper button is thrown way out to the player's left, and consequently a Strat with weight X body and weight Y neck is MORE likely to balance correctly. The Tele is more likely a challenge, when it happens.

There's always choosing a Bigsby on a Tele, right?
boris bubbanov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 11th, 2009, 06:52 PM   #10 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
appar111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Age: 37
Posts: 2,703
I tell ya, with Rob and Boris on the boards, I always get great advice and never have to worry about guitar projects anymore. Thanks to both of you for the consistently great tips and answers!
appar111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump




IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2012 All rights reserved.