|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Tele-Tech Telecaster nuts and bolts talk ONLY |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
2 birds 1 stone-neck shim
There were 2 problems with my squier '51(in fact there are more, but these are related
Last night, I had an epiphany... I should shim the neck! I took a piece of board (thickness of a cereal box) and taped it to the part of the neck base closer to the bridge. This caused the neck to tilt back. With a tilted neck, the saddles must be raised to compensate. At perfect action... the screws were mostly flat with the saddles. Also, the screws did not come loose anymore since the higher saddles provided a sharper break (more downwards force) that kept them nice and snug. If any of you have cheap annoying 6-saddle bridges, you should give it a try!
__________________
Check out my bands, and feel free to PM me comments on them! The Eclectics (guitar/vocals) SLIP (bass) |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Oregon
Age: 44
Posts: 1,370
|
I had a similar experience when my RS Guitarworks Tele showed up. It was used and I ordered it from a reputable shop, but when it arrived it had the neck shimmed at the furthest point from the neck heel. It was a THICK shim and there was a big gap between the neck and the body. Oddly, the saddles were down against the bridgeplate. I'm thinking, "Why is this neck shimmed?"
I pulled the shim out of the neck, re-set the action, and the guitar is perfect! A nice mid height to the saddles. Why did someone stuff all that crap in the neck pocket? I'm still confused. Congratulations on getting your guitar working correctly!
__________________
Just because I "Don't" get it doesn't mean I "Won't" get it! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Wellington, NZ
Age: 48
Posts: 426
|
That's exactly what I did with my '51. Improved it no end for about an hour's effort as well as allowing a lower action.
__________________
Helping to invent english country dance guitar since 1981. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 8,579
|
A fellah here a TDPRI solved this problem a long time ago, by the name of Mike Levitt. I'm thinking November of the first year the Squier 51 was introduced.
The cold fact is the 51 stock bridge assembly as designed is a total mess, and that's why the guitar was discontinued, IMO. The strings and the saddles are competing for the same real estate, and the strings, which should only be pressing the saddle hard down onto the bridge plate, spends almost as much effort levitating the saddles, hence all the junky sounds, loose height screws, inability to intonate, and saddles actually falling over when played hard. There is nothing short of converting the guitar to string through that can rehabilitate these saddles, again my opinion. Go to Institute of Noise, Squier 51 Modders Forum and see all the guys switching to this 3 brass barrel mod, that Mike invented. Stop killing the 51 Spring songbirds with stones, I mean shims.
__________________
Bubban0v |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.