|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | T-Shirts & Etc | Music | Photos | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Tele Home Depot Building a T-Style guitar? From scratch or from parts. This is the forum for you. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Is lighter weight Ash better than heavier
I'm sure this has been discussed before but would it be true to say that a lighter swamp ash body (say 4 lbs.) is going to make a better guitar than a heavier one (say 5.0 lbs)? Some of the manufacturers seem to put a premium price on the real light ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Each piece of wood is different and I just don't believe you can generalize that a lighter body is necessarily "better" (and how would you define "better"?) than a heavier one.
If two bodies sounded identical, I think most people would find the lighter one more comfortable but again it's very subjective and personal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Gainesville, FL
Age: 37
Posts: 488
|
I suspect some of it has to do with density and resonance, like low density = higher resonance. I don't know if that necessarily leads to a better sounding instrument; there are so many other factors to consider... and the guitar hasn't really been studied scientifically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Soundwise you'll never know until it's built,but thats the beauty of it. Then add in all the varyables,neck,neck pocket fit,p.u.'s ,bridge,electronic components,strings,the way you play ect and you can see what you're up against trying to guess at the sound.The weight of the body is about as acurate a mesure of the sound it will produce as the color it's painted would be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Park Ridge, NJ
Age: 64
Posts: 5,241
|
very subjective and personal stuff.
a 4# body is a heavy anchor, for me. less than 2# is just too dang light. 2.5# to 3# is sweet. sweeter yet if the wood is resonant and 'sings' - to me, this is the key to a good solid body (not what kinda wood nor how many pieces). as always, ymmv. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Park Ridge, NJ
Age: 64
Posts: 5,241
|
the lightest solid swamp ash i've had was 3.1# ... for really light and resonant solid wood bodies, paulownia is the only way to go, all mine average 2.5# ... here's a jazzer in the raw that needs to get sanded, stained, sealed and finished ...
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
I have 3 that are 5lb4oz - 5lb8oz and they are just too heavy. I've hollowed behind the pickguard on 1 to get me to 5lb, and the other 2 I'm going to chamber to hit around 4lb. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Park Ridge, NJ
Age: 64
Posts: 5,241
|
up to about 4 years ago it was fairly common to get a 1pc 3# to 3.5# ash body from all parts ... these dayze, they consider a 2pc 4# ash body as 'ultra light'. solid ash tele bodies at 2.5# were out there, but fairly rare, though. these dayze, ultra light means going with p-wood ... which is all i'm using right now. that jazz tele above weighs 5.2# and just sings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: West Virginia
Age: 26
Posts: 4,205
|
Honestly, the majority of guitar players aren't going to know which guitar weighs what. They are just going to know if one guitar kills their back when the play standing up for an extended period of time. I played a 52RI a few days ago that was so heavy it felt like I was packing around a set of encyclopedias. However, it sounded the same as the lighter 52RI sitting on the shelf beside it.
I honestly never considered the weight of my guitars until I started reading this forum because I started out playing a 13 pound banjo. That guy will absolutely kill your shoulder. After building a light pinecaster, I can't imagine going back to a heavy guitar ever again.
__________________
the now mandatory =====> |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| starting body weight and finished weight? | dill | Tele Home Depot | 1 | January 9th, 2009 11:36 AM |
| B Bender added : is the tele lighter or heavier? | teleyouk | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 13 | December 7th, 2008 03:14 AM |
| Neck weight/Body weight | Bopcat | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 1 | February 8th, 2007 04:28 PM |
| Body weight / guitar weight | JohnS | Tele-Tech | 7 | June 7th, 2006 10:08 AM |
| Body weight vs. finished Tele weight | Jim Barth | Tele-Tech | 2 | April 23rd, 2003 12:40 PM |
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.