|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | T-Shirts & Etc | Music | Photos | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Tele Home Depot Building a T-Style guitar? From scratch or from parts. This is the forum for you. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: .
Posts: 33
|
impact of compound radius necks on action?
Just wondered if anyone had experience of how compound radius such as warmoth impact the action, and how it affects setup - I imagine height adjustable saddles help?
Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Quote:
Here is the build thread for it: http://www.tdpri.com/forum/telecaste...ele-build.html Last edited by axmaker; November 16th, 2009 at 12:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Theoretically, a compound radius should allow for a lower action than a straight radius - think about it:
The strings on a guitar neck follow the sides of a cone (not a cylinder) - because they are spaced more narrowly at the nut than at the bridge; and a compound radius fretboard is also the side of a cone; a straight-radiussed fretboard is part of the side of a cylinder (which, as said, the strings are not); so, on an ideal compound radius, the strings will exactly follow the shape of the fretboard at the same distance all the way along the neck - on a straight radius there's no way that this would be geometrically possible! Taking theory aside, I have two Warmoth necks with 10-16" radius, and could set my action REALLY low without any noise, I wanted to (I set mine slightly higher than what would be possible, because I find that a higher action makes "gripping" the strings easier with your fingertips when doing string bends).
__________________
![]() http://www.myspace.com/romans212 http://www.myspace.com/theneatpickers http://www.thomassoulriverband.com/ Last edited by RomanS; November 15th, 2009 at 06:18 PM. Reason: Typos fixed... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mint Hill, NC
Age: 63
Posts: 8,124
|
the compound radius necks i've used give a lot better action up past the 12th fret. dunno why that's so, but it's been the case with all four i've tried.
__________________
Truth is stranger than fact ... www.myspace.com/stragglerswing (Woody & the Stragglers - Western Swing/Roots-rock) |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 277
|
Right - what RomanS mentioned, the strings from the bridge to nut make the shape of the side of a cone. So, if the fretboard matches the string location more closely you should be able to get better action.
I have a number of Warmoth 10-16 necks too and what I notice (comparing to other necks with straight radius from 12" to 16") is that the lowest available action is really a factor of how good of a fret-level job you have. So - I would say, as long as you have a straight radius of 12" or greater - it makes little difference. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| compound radius question | spyderxxx | Tele Home Depot | 33 | October 26th, 2009 09:33 PM |
| Warmoth Compound Radius Necks | KY-TwangBanger | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 12 | October 13th, 2009 10:26 PM |
| Warmoth compound radius necks | mark123 | Tele-Tech | 8 | August 31st, 2008 05:16 PM |
| Compound Radius | TheSonicBlue | Tele-Tech | 6 | May 20th, 2006 09:12 PM |
| Warmoth's Compound Radius | Shnook | Tele-Tech | 2 | November 30th, 2003 04:46 AM |
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.