|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Stratocaster Discussion Forum Fender's "other" great guitar the Stratocaster. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 113
|
2008 MIM Strat Neck
Can you recommend a Strat with a wider and fatter neck than my 2008 MIM Strat? I have difficulty playing it after spending time on my LP and acoustic. Something around $1000. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 2,834
|
Any of the "modern" (non-vintage reissue) MIA Strats will have a wider neck than your MIM. Try out an American Standard, American Special or a used Highway 1. Although then won't be much fatter if at all than your MIM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 61
Posts: 302
|
All of the American Standard variants have slightly wider but very thin necks. I find them harder to deal with than my MIM tele necks.
Two models with wider/fatter necks are the Jimmie Vaughan and Robert Cray MIM strats; hard to find and the Cray is a hardtail. (The Cray is thicker but not quite as wide, the JV is a nice wide, fat V neck.) I recently got an Eric Johnson strat and I bet it has the neck you are looking for but it's a lot more money... And a lot of CS models have the "10/56" neck which is also a great fat neck but you won't find one for anywhere near a grand. Your best bet might actually be Warmoth or one of the aftermarket companies---buy a fatter neck and either sell your MIM neck to recover some bucks or put it in a drawer if you ever decide to sell the guitar. George |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 113
|
Thank you for the responses. It's mostly my MIM neck's width that I'm having trouble with as opposed to the fatness. For example, the low and high E strings always "rolls" off the neck. If an new American Standard has a wider neck that may be the way for me to go. I also was reading about the Vintage 1962 Hot Rod. I will check them out at a shop this week. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 61
Posts: 302
|
Quote:
The Am Standard and its variants are 43 mm wide, which does make a difference. But I personally hate the thinness of those necks and would rather play a 42 mm neck that is beefier. When splitting hairs on neck width--which I have done, I would also note that the bevel on the fret ends and string spacing make a difference. If the fret ends are close to "vertical"--perpendicular to the headstock/body face--it makes for a wider effective neck than if the frets are beveled at the ends (which also tends to make then walk off the edge of the neck a bit). George George |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
A new nut is a helluva lot cheaper than a new neck. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.