|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | T-Shirts & Etc | Music | Photos | Reviews | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Stratocaster Discussion Forum Fender's "other" great guitar the Stratocaster. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Cavities too deep on Mighty Mite Body?
I bought a pretty nice looking Mighty Mite swamp ash strat body. Needs a few adjustments to the cuts/contours but that's no big deal. I was doing some poking around in the cavities however and noticed the the wood between the bridge pickup cavity and trem spring cavity is paper thin. The depth of each of those cavities is nearly 7/8". I measured the trem spring cavity on my '82 and it's only 5/8" deep. Should they be this deep? Will I run into any problems?
BTW, do Strat build topics belong in this forum? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 18,971
|
I see two concerns, basically, on too deep routs:
1) I like being at liberty to finish, then strip and refinish a guitar as I see fit. There's no thickness to spare and a paperthin area is very prone to perforation or damage; 2) The other concern is, to an extent that paperthin layer is carrying all the string load, from the neck pocket area to the bridge. At some point, the whole structure is liable to collapse like a cheap overseas acoustic guitar body. If the guitar remains under string tension in the future, the neck pocket may creep towards the bridge and make the guitar impossible to intonate. I would not worry on a Tele body because the control rout area is totally separate and very small. But the Strat control rout is large and deep. At some point the honeycombing comes back to bite you, on a few bodies if you remove too much material. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
VENDOR
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Ohio
Age: 48
Posts: 134
|
Its no big deal. Mighty Mite bodies ave been used in several of the high end Squires for years without any issues. That area between the pickup route and trem cavity does not support anything. Its not carrying the string load, nothing will shift etc... it is strictly cosmetic and no need to beef it up. The reason it is so deep is to accommodate humbuckers. Build it and play the hell out of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
I imagine it will be fine but it just seems so crappy. I could put my finger through it if I wanted too. I understand needing the depth for a humbucker (though I'm not sure how deep it needs to be), but the trem spring cavity on my '82 is only 5/8" deep. So why does MM make theirs deeper?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
This is what I would do on the trem claw side. It would be pretty easy to make a piece of wood that will fit in snug and then glue it in solid. An 1/8th of an inch should do the trick.
__________________
Creator of Fine Sawdust and Expensive Kindling. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GFS body + Mighty Mite neck - full report | Steinar G | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 20 | January 24th, 2009 12:59 AM |
| mighty mite body | smsuryan | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 7 | January 7th, 2009 01:45 AM |
| What kind of bridge does a Mighty Mite Tele body take? | bobkatstudios | Tele-Technical | 7 | July 15th, 2008 10:46 PM |
| mighty mite maple tele body | reverberocket2 | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 5 | September 7th, 2006 03:53 PM |
| Mighty Mite Tele Body - question | Blaster | Telecaster Discussion Forum | 5 | January 25th, 2004 02:34 PM |
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.