|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Stratocaster Discussion Forum Fender's "other" great guitar the Stratocaster. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hamburg/Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 74
|
Squier Classic Vibe or SX Strat?
In a recent GAS attack I noticed that there is a lack of Strats in my household. So to put things right I must buy one and decide between one of these:
- Squier Classic Vibe: ![]() Here in Germany they are € 300. They are very decent looking , seem to be well made and obviously they sound fairly good. - SX Strat: They are € 115 incl. shipping here in Europe. Other than the ones Rondo sells they have a headstock that is pretty close to the Fender ones. I would mod this Strat heavily: New tuners, pickups, electronics, nut, and so on. Recently I made all these mods to my SX Tele (Kluson tuner, Fender CS Nocasters, bone nut, Alpha pots, Mallory caps) and the Tele turned to be a really great guitar - not only for the money. With all these mods the SX will be € 250 - not a big difference to the Squier. The question is: Can a SX be modded in that way that it sounds as good or even better than a CV? Here are the pros and cons of each instrument (from my point of view): Squier (unmodded): - Good guitar [+] - A little pricier than SX [-] - Ugly pickguard on the 60's [-] SX (modded): - Nice neck shape (baseball) [+] - Having much fun modding the guitar [+] - Kind of custom made [+] - Sound [?-] So what shall I do? Roland
__________________
What Ho! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Minneapolis.
Posts: 1,735
|
I haven't played an SX, but the CV neck shape felt FANTASTIC to me. It was pretty much identical to my MIJ '62 RI other than the fretboard contour and fret size.
I'd vote for the CV. Personally, I'd take a tortoise guard over a mint any day. Also, I think the resale would be much easier/better priced on a CV if you ever ended up going down that road. The only negs I can give the CV: - new strings to 10's (do the nut while you are at it) - trem block is pitiful and could stand an upgrade. Both of these would be true with the SX as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: GA
Posts: 7,741
|
Get the CV. SX's are nice for the money, but it will never be as good as the squier is out of the box. I've owned both btw.
__________________
-"You do not merely want to be considered just the best of the best. You want to be considered the only ones who do what you do" J. Garcia Last edited by Stuco; December 8th, 2009 at 07:06 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Southern, California
Posts: 5,113
|
CV CV CV
The only neg thing I've read about it is...was there anything neg about it? Oh yeah, like someone above said...better resale value, better pickups by far (cv 50's has alnico III, 60's has alnico 5's) and killer deal for 349 bucks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Plano, TX
Age: 38
Posts: 698
|
Personally, I prefer the SX chunky neck profile to anything Squier puts out and even a great many Fenders. Is it a better quality guitar than the Squier CV. No. But it all comes down to the neck for me and SX makes some great feeling necks IMHO. I have an Sx SST57 Stop Tail which is dead stock and I love that little guy!
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.