Originally Posted by FenderGuy53
Well, I don't actually need all the firepower that the RP1000 offers, so I thought I'd check out the RP500, for $100 less money.
There are also a lot more of the RP500s out there on the used market, at least around here.
I paid $160 for an absolutely mint one a few months ago.
After nosing around a bit, I found that the RP500 didn't originally have a looper (but now it does?) and had issues with the harmonizer effect, as well a general EQ issues. I also noticed that it doesn't have an on/off switch, nor does it have an external looper jack for operating the looper remotely.
What exactly are the dings against the RP500 and are those issues resolved in the RP1000?
I haven't heard anything about these problems, but I would be surprised if the RP500 was any different than the RP1000 as far as they go, as they are all
running the same chip, just with more or less options enabled/not relative to price.
I've fiddled with the harmonizer and it seemed to work...how well, I dunno, but it did go through the options as I scrolled through them in X-Edit.
I don't have any idea what you mean by "general EQ issues." That's not really a meaningful term.
My first impression is that the effects/models are pretty weak and muddy, if that's what you mean, and sound like they need some pretty severe EQ work to tighten them up, but that could also mean I'm not running these cranked enough in volume.
I wanted a good c.1970 lead fuzz sound the other night and brought up all the fuzz models in X-Edit, and they all sounded just alike and like crap and nothing
like the actual stomps they were modeling.
I could be doing something wrong here, I dunno.
Yeah, the firmware update gives you the looper on the RP500. I believe it's twenty seconds, but I'm not sure as I've never used it.
It does not have an on/off switch, which seems to be an endangered species throughout the industry.
No, it doesn't have looper jacks.
My own take on this thing is that I wouldn't pay new RP1000 kind of money for this seemingly low quality of effects, and they're all off the same chip, as I said -- if it's X amp and Y cab, it's going to be exactly the same on a RP90 or a RP1000, if it's enabled.
I just got this thing so I could use two or three of the proprietary DigiTech expression effects for about eight to ten seconds in a single song I'm recording, so my expectations are modest, but I don't think that beyond that the sound I'm getting out of these so far is usable, at least not with a lot more treatment upstream in the recording path.
But I'm open to suggestions from more experienced users.