|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Shock Brother's DIY Amps Building or modding your amp? Then use this forum to discuss the process and show your pride and joy. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Castlewood,VA
Posts: 675
|
speaker choices for a 5f2a
Long time lurker here and other amp building forums. Gonna take the plunge and order parts for my first build, a 5f2a. Not going with a kit, doing it the hard way. Since I'm going to build my own cabinet, which speaker do y'all think would be a better choice Weber alnico Sig 10s or Weber ceramic Sig 12s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Location: Location: West Virginia
Posts: 475
|
Just pulled the trigger on Weber 5F2A myself this morning.
Talked to a few friends who have 5F2A's about what they thought about speaker choices and they said the Weber Alnico 10S sounds creamier than the Creamic 10S, although the ceramic was just a little bit louder. Alnico Blue Pup is a good choice also. I'll take creamier over louder any day!!!
__________________
_____________________________________________ "no complaints yet, but it's still early"!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Castlewood,VA
Posts: 675
|
Thanks Dave but the thing i'm really interested in is whether there's a difference between the 10" alnico and a 12" ceramic i.e. better bass, smoother top end, better mid range, early vs late breakup.....BTW I'm gonna build mine to use a 6l6 for the power tube. Aiming for about 8 to 10 watts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Age: 62
Posts: 5,958
|
You didn't ask, but I thought I would just mention this. I have an alnico Sig 12 in my 5E3 that works great for me. I like 12's better because they tend to have more low end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Castlewood,VA
Posts: 675
|
Pete your input is welcome, but that Fender speaker you recommended is about twice as much $ as the webers I'm considering. I have a pretty tight budget for this project and if I spend twice as much on a speaker then I'm gonna have to make compromises elsewhere that would be much harder to upgrade later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
|
Most folks are going to recommend AlNiCo's for an old tweed circuit.
Most folks will recommend Webers... great speakers, but I hear your budgetary concerns. In the case of saving dough - you might try the new Jensen reissue AlNiCo 10"s - I prefer the P10Q. A bit more affordable as far as AlNiCo's go... and classic sounding. I'd actually build the thing first, try it in existing speakers and get a feel for what it needs - then find a speaker accordingly... you might be surprised, the traditional "American" AlNiCo might now be the one you want, or it might. there are affordable options in many directions - if the amp really screams for something you could always save up :)
__________________
- 3 Gibsons, 5 Teles, assorted other guitars, about a dozen amps, about two dozen pedals, a Smith & Wesson SW40VE, & a .40 SIG Sauer P226R = too many toys, no money, carpal tunnel, and a serious hearing problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 6,008
|
It depends on what you're going for.
I lean towards Eminence speakers, to be specific 10" Eminence speakers and I prefer ceramics. The rationale is this: The 10" ceramics yield the tightest bass over a wide range of tones from clean to uberdistorted. In general ceramics are tighter than alnicos and tens are tighter than twelves. Pete B's suggestion of a blue Fender alnico is worth consideration. It's too bad Eminence stopped making the 1028 with a paper voice coil former. Musicians didn't understand that it was a 20 watt speaker so there's a lot of them out there with cooked voice coils. They sound great if you don't overdo it. The current version with the polyimide former sounds good. It will handle almost twice as much power as the old version with the paper former. The paper former is great for "vintage tone" because it was built like '50s Jensens. So: Fat/tight/loud go for a ceramic Sig or an Eminence like the Ragin Cajun. Use an Eminence 1058 on a budget. Looser/brighter go for an alnico Sig. A 12" ceramic Silver Bell is an interesting tone in tweeds. There's more bottom end than vintage style alnicos. There's an interesting chime to the top end. It's like tweed meets AC30 without having to buy an AC30! A premium speaker can be the best investment you'll make. The beginning and end of the signal path are important. Hock a pedal or something and step up to the good stuff. Using a speaker that's a poor compromise makes as much sense as using weak pickups. The 6L6 rather than a 6V6: Try both. Or even a 6K6. A 6K6 is a power pentode and sounds different from beam power tubes like the 6L6 or 6V6. A little more raw. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Greenville, North Carolina
Age: 62
Posts: 5,958
|
Quote:
About that output tube choice, I would concur with muchxs on the 6K6. Based on my experiments with my 5E3, much lower output than the 6v6 and noticeably a bit more harsh. Not a totally fair comparison, as my 5E3 voltages are high for the 6K6, might smooth out some if I lowered the B+. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.