noob home recording, need a computer. tips? - Telecaster Guitar Forum
The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Other Discussion Forums > Recording In Progress
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!
Notices

Recording In Progress Studio and Home Studio recording forum for discussion of tips, techniques, gear and setup.


Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals dallenpickups.com Warmoth.com seymourduncan.com


Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old January 24th, 2013, 05:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: maryland
Posts: 579
noob home recording, need a computer. tips?

so i am wanting to do some home recording. singer songwriter acoustic and kinda ambient bluesy rock electric. tube amps, pedals etc. will be adding bass and drum sounds will come from brushes on a old suit case.

i know nothing and have nothing. think i need a computer first.

quad core right? i understand i am gonna need to spend money but i dont have a lot. thinking lay away for something solid.

i also understand external harddrive is important also. i have a seagate external hard drive. 1 tb i think. can i use this.

i am in the early stages and just want to star aquiring the basics and i think a decent computer(not laptop) is where is should start.

thanx

jeb stuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 24th, 2013, 05:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 65
Hi there and welcome to the world of home recording. I'm no pro but I manage to lay down a few tracks here and there in my "Man-Cave" in the basement. If you are not on the go, I feel a desktop is a better choice for recording. PC's and Mac's both do the job but you can get a lot of PC for less money than a Mac. An external hard drive isn't so important. What I feel is more important is having at least 2 hard drives in your computer: 1 hard drive for the OS and programs and the other hard drive for Audio and Samples. On my computer I have 3 hardrives (OS, Audio projects, Samples). An i5 or i7 processor and lots of Ram also help things run smoothly. Then you'll have to figure out which software you would like to use (Cubase, Sonar, Reaper, etc.). It's all great fun. Good luck!
Millebern is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 24th, 2013, 05:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
woodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mint Hill, NC
Age: 68
Posts: 13,545
The Seagate will probably work just fine, assuming it's 7200 rpm. You'll also need an audio interface to translate your analog sounds to digital data. And, of course, a recording program (DAW) to track, edit and mix in.

Computers, well, that's a big subject. I've had a lot of luck with Macs over the years (they come with free Garageband), but plenty of people get along fine with Windows machines. ... Hopefully this won't turn into a raging platform debate!

Whichever way you go, for your purposes, a duo-core with 4 MB of RAM will probably get you there. Be prepared for a steep learning curve it ain't easy, but once you get rolling, it's worth the burned-out brain cells!
__________________
Truth is stranger than fact ...
It pays to appease all the gods Gnossos Pappadopoulis

YouTube channel Originals
woodman is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links   #
Sponsored posting
 

Old January 24th, 2013, 06:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
woodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mint Hill, NC
Age: 68
Posts: 13,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Millebern View Post
An external hard drive isn't so important. What I feel is more important is having at least 2 hard drives in your computer: 1 hard drive for the OS and programs and the other hard drive for Audio and Samples.
The point being that you run into problems recording to your system drive either internal or external fills the need. Of course an internal (SATA) drive will beat the socks off any external Firewire or USB drive speed-wise, but in the early going, that may not be a huge factor for you.
__________________
Truth is stranger than fact ...
It pays to appease all the gods Gnossos Pappadopoulis

YouTube channel Originals
woodman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 24th, 2013, 06:45 PM   #5 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle
Age: 44
Posts: 7,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodman View Post
The point being that you run into problems recording to your system drive either internal or external fills the need. Of course an internal (SATA) drive will beat the socks off any external Firewire or USB drive speed-wise, but in the early going, that may not be a huge factor for you.
This is very true. Having everything on a single internal system drive can really bog you down, because the disk is trying to do too many things at once. Since you're going to be recording mainly audio (as opposed to software instruments), what will be happening is those audio tracks will be streaming in real time off of whatever drive they're on. Having them on a separate, dedicated audio drive makes a night and day difference in overall system performance.
Frodebro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 24th, 2013, 07:26 PM   #6 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
telleutelleme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston
Age: 66
Posts: 11,501
I would comment that there is something usable in every budget. Pick an amount and the advice will pour in. Very good advice.

In this recording thread are numerous excellent post/lists of starting points. All will say that getting a resonable processor enough memory, dual drives (with decent speed and capacity) and a proper audio interface are the keys. There are success stories with every OS and most configurations. Also an equivalent number of advice on why things may be problematic and how to fix them.

Past that will be tons of ideas on which DAW software to use. Then comes the real fun discussing mics, monitors, how many, mixers and all the continuing gear to exhaust your money, your time and above all your excitement about recording.

Welcome and join the frey.
__________________
"Blues is a natural fact, is something that a fellow lives. If you don't live it you don't have it. Young people have forgotten to cry the blues. Now they talk and get lawyers and things. " - Big Bill Broonzy
telleutelleme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 24th, 2013, 08:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
woodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mint Hill, NC
Age: 68
Posts: 13,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by telleutelleme View Post
budget.
^^^ Now that right there is the key word!
__________________
Truth is stranger than fact ...
It pays to appease all the gods Gnossos Pappadopoulis

YouTube channel Originals
woodman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 24th, 2013, 10:39 PM   #8 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle
Age: 44
Posts: 7,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodman View Post
^^^ Now that right there is the key word!
Initially, but once you get hooked all common sense goes out the window!
Frodebro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 25th, 2013, 03:47 AM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: maryland
Posts: 579
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodman View Post
The Seagate will probably work just fine, assuming it's 7200 rpm. You'll also need an audio interface to translate your analog sounds to digital data. And, of course, a recording program (DAW) to track, edit and mix in.

Computers, well, that's a big subject. I've had a lot of luck with Macs over the years (they come with free Garageband), but plenty of people get along fine with Windows machines. ... Hopefully this won't turn into a raging platform debate!

Whichever way you go, for your purposes, a duo-core with 4 MB of RAM will probably get you there. Be prepared for a steep learning curve it ain't easy, but once you get rolling, it's worth the burned-out brain cells!
i had a guy tell me i need quad core? not really sure what that means
jeb stuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 25th, 2013, 04:27 AM   #10 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle
Age: 44
Posts: 7,359
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeb stuart View Post
i had a guy tell me i need quad core? not really sure what that means
More cores = more processing power. This is more important if you're running a lot of plug-ins (software-based effects and/or instrument samples), but having the extra horsepower definitely won't hurt at all if you're not using all of those plugs. I did alright with my Core2 Duo (two core) MacBook Pro as long as I was careful, but higher track counts and more plug-ins caused me issues.

If you're recording live instruments most of the time and have a dedicated external audio drive to store those on, a dual-core machine should be perfectly adequate as the processor isn't doing nearly as much as it would with a lot of software-based instruments.
Frodebro is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 26th, 2013, 10:59 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
still_fiddlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 1,334
The advantage of a laptop is that you *can* take it with you if you want to set up somewhere else. A desktop (pretty much) rules that out. Of course, the portable, digital recorders that are out there now can handle most of the remote gigs, but if you want to really do something a little better (like I did for our son's music school auditions), you'll want to pack along. Of course, you pay for compactness, and give up some flexibility.

If you're in a tight space, the noise of the computer's fans and hard drives can actually intrude. If you get a desktop, get a big box (won't get as hot as quickly); and, either way, listen to the fans and hard drives. For a notebook, less cores is probably quieter. My dual core MacBook works fine - my quad core Envy notebook, OTOH, is a nice Windows machine, but I have to turn it off when recording. (Works great for post processing stuff or video editing though!)

I don't think anyone can begin to tell you how complex this can become, and how expensive :). Especially, if you choose some stuff initially that has to be replaced sooner rather than later. Spending more money up front usually prevents that, but it can keep you from doing what you what to do, i.e., if you spent all your money on a computer, and don't have anything left for an interface, or only have enough for one with 2 mic pres, only to realize you really need 4 to do what you want to do. Go slowly, ask questions often, is my advice.
__________________
Pops... If you dance with the devil, the devil don't change. The devil changes you.

Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself. - Confucius
still_fiddlin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 27th, 2013, 03:13 AM   #12 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
woodman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mint Hill, NC
Age: 68
Posts: 13,545
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeb stuart View Post
i had a guy tell me i need quad core? not really sure what that means
As others have said, more processing power = good. But it's a matter of balancing out your budget ... getting started in a home studio will cost you bucks at ever step of the way, as well as a massive expenditure of time. If you have unlimited time and money, buy the best of everything and spend every day working at learning a complex craft.

If you've got a time and money budget, i.e. got a job and/or family, and you ain't rich), it's a matter of how many hours you've got to develop a substantial financial investment. (As my wife will tell you, getting hooked on recording can blot out the rest of the world.) ... You said you wanted to do this:

Quote:
singer songwriter acoustic and kinda ambient bluesy rock electric. tube amps, pedals etc. will be adding bass and drum sounds will come from brushes on a old suit case.
You can do this with the flimsiest of cheapo rigs. But if you want to go beyond, and want help from folks around here who are willing to give help graciously, we really need to know how much ya got to spend on both fronts.
__________________
Truth is stranger than fact ...
It pays to appease all the gods Gnossos Pappadopoulis

YouTube channel Originals
woodman is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 27th, 2013, 04:16 AM   #13 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: nearby
Posts: 1,000
You have a long road ahead of you. Some of it will be fun. A great deal of it will be frustrating and one thing is certain: it will require a massive investment of time.

Given your lack of familiarity, I would recommend immersing yourself in the world of home recording via YouTube, online articles, recording forums, magazines (do they still print those?) and anything else you can get your hands on. That includes the generous folks who have posted above.

If you don't have some friends that are involved in it, make some. Spend some time with others who have some experience and learn about the basic equipment involved. Most importantly, begin the process of learning how to make a decent recording.

There is only one way to do this. You have to get experience, and that takes time. Period. Essentially, there are no shortcuts, other than what you may glean by spending time with more experienced engineers/producers and yes, writers. It's a holistic endeavor.

As others have said, don't spend money until you have some sense of the big picture, along with the steps in the process. Be patient.
harleysr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old January 27th, 2013, 04:37 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Horsham, UK
Posts: 1,239
I use an iPad with GarageBand and an Alesis IO dock, which allows you to plug guitars and mics straight in. You could equally use something like an iRig or an iRig Mic (though the latter is a microphone in itself).
Garageband is simplicity personified to use - though be honest I haven't used other platfoms so I don't really know how they work.
It also comes with built in loops which, whilst I haven't found much use for them recording allow for a simple way to infuriate the family by setting up a never ending loop to noodle against...
No idea of the cost in the US I'm afraid.
Jimclarke100 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 18th, 2013, 01:31 PM   #15 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: maryland
Posts: 579
well it is presidents day and best buy is right next to guitar center so i will be looking for a computer and an interface. for the computer im checking out quad core and much ram. (4gigs) but would settle for a duo core. and i have some thoughts about the interface (which i believes comes with a recording program)

question though do i need to buy a sound card?

thanx so far
jeb stuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 18th, 2013, 02:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
still_fiddlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 1,334
The interface is a soundcard. Many of us use just that.

(There's another thread here about DACs, but I suspect most home/hobbyist recorders don't have one of those, and rely just on the interface they use for recording.)
__________________
Pops... If you dance with the devil, the devil don't change. The devil changes you.

Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself. - Confucius
still_fiddlin is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 18th, 2013, 07:39 PM   #17 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
 
telleutelleme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston
Age: 66
Posts: 11,501
Most audio interfaces double as both a recording interface and will drive your sound (speakers/headphone/etc.). Some of the decision will be based on what you want to do. If you are going to play back while recording (e.g overdubbing), then the kind of interface or interfaces may make a difference. If you are going to record something and then just play it back, the sound card on your motherboard may be adequate or something like a inexpensive soundblaster might be fine paired with a simple USB audio interface.

I suggest you call Sweetwater and ask them for a catalog and then look at the possibilities and see what might fit your needs. Look online at the other vendors or go visit GC and talk to one of the techs on what they offer.

I started with a USB M-Audio Fast Track Pro. It worked fine for a long time.
__________________
"Blues is a natural fact, is something that a fellow lives. If you don't live it you don't have it. Young people have forgotten to cry the blues. Now they talk and get lawyers and things. " - Big Bill Broonzy
telleutelleme is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 18th, 2013, 07:58 PM   #18 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 317
When I started recording, I used a Delta 1010LT ($200) card with an old dual core computer running Linux and the Ardour DAW. None of these things has great quality, but I had a fully working recording system for $200 (I already had the computer).

Ardour is not the most stable software out there, and messing with Linux isn't for everyone. Just pointing out that it can be done quite cheaply if you have patience and don't need fancy software instruments or effects past your basic compressor/EQ/reverb. I wish I had a better set up, but this gear has made 2 CD's and I see no reason to pony up a lot more cash when I already have a system that works for my needs.
skipjackrc4 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 18th, 2013, 08:30 PM   #19 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: telluride
Age: 66
Posts: 232
If you are planning to do a lot of overdubbing there is an issue that has to be figured out depending on your software and interface called latency. It has to do with how you hear what you are playing while overdubbing against the track in the computer. It takes a little bit of time for the sound you make when overdubbing to go into the computer, get processed and come back out so you can hear it along with the parts that are already in the computer.
I just bought an interface box that deals with this in a very simple way by just having one knob that you rotate to adjust the mix of what you are currently playing compared to the tracks in the computer. It's called a Focusrite Scarlette series, under $200.

It seems like a lot of interfaces come with a recording program called Abelton Lite which i haven't used but the full Abelton pro program gets a fair amount of respect.

It would help if you gave us some idea of a proposed budget. If you are just looking at doing 8 to 10 tracks you don't need that much of a computer. It's also important if you are staying with Windows to not get Windows 8 at this time as some software and some hardware have not been fully adapted to it yet.
randomhitz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 18th, 2013, 08:41 PM   #20 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: arlington, virginia, usa
Posts: 1,105
I would take a slightly different tack:
1. establish a budget
2. find the software you want to use for recording (within your budget)
and only then
3. buy the computer your chosen software runs on. (within your budget)
dconeill is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


» Random Photo for Guests
Stomping of Jake

Untitled Document



 


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2014 All rights reserved.