Telecaster Guitar Forum
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone with respect, no matter how difficult that may be. No hate, politics, religion, sex or drug discussions.
No Commercial Posts: Do not use the TDPRI to buy or sell anything.
Telecaster Guitar Resources Guitar T-shirts
Guitar Tuner
6
E
5
A
4
D
3
G
2
B
1
E
Telecaster Music Shop

Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day
 

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Other Discussion Forums > Recording In Progress

Recording In Progress Studio and Home Studio recording forum for discussion of tips, techniques, gear and setup.

Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 8th, 2008, 12:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
Home Studio, How to Avoid Bleeding Tracks

My band is thinking about recording our next project with a "home studio" vs. a professional recording studio. We have an all-in-one Zoom 16 track recorder that we could use. We also have mics, cables, etc. What we don't really know is how to place all of the instruments to avoid the bleeding of the tracks. For example, keeping the guitar amps out of the drum mics, etc.

What are people doing to avoid or at least minimize this issue? We would be recording in a basement and have some room to place amps far enough away from the drum kit, but I don't think that will do it.

One idea I had was to make plexiglass "boxes" to cover the speaker cabinets. We don't want to spend tons of money setting this up. So, who has come up with cheap alternatives that are working out well enough?

Thanks,
Wayne
wetland10 is online now   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
Old July 8th, 2008, 12:34 PM   #2 (permalink)
Moderator
Doctor of Teleocity
 
getbent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Benito County, California
Posts: 10,137
close mike and avoid omnidirectional mics.

Assume that you won't keep the vocal tracks and you'll re record them with headphones on. Unless you play super, super loud it should be okay...
__________________
'never pet a burning dog'
getbent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 12:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Downtown Pensacola Florida... :)
Age: 31
Posts: 967
The plexiglass is a good idea.... but...

In one of the bands I was in, we made some REALLY cheap baffle boxes... to put on around the guitar amps....

we built rectangular boxes with 4 sides, and a lid we'd place on top (to be able to make it easy to dial in the amp settings and reposition the mic.)...

the sides were made out of 1" thick MDF with 1" thick styrafoam screwed to the inside of the box... then we glued egg carton looking foam to the styrafoam... (using silicone caulk so the styrafoam didn't melt)....

so.. there were 3 layers...

The outside layer... MDF...
Middle layer... styrafoam board.....
inside... Egg Carton looking grey soundproofing foam...

all that stuff you can get at Home Depot for cheap..... and they work GREAT.... just remember... you need a lid to be able to make amp and mic adjustments... 4 sides and a lid....

oh yeah... don't make the box too snug.. you're tubes will melt the foam.. :)

and the longer you make the boxes the more options you have with mic'ing the amp... we made our boxes 6 feet long by 3 feet wide by 3 feet high.... and ended up using two SM57's... one right off the speaker cones... and one 6 feet back...

really didn't make that much difference in the sound.. but it gave us some cool stereo panning options.... :)

the Bass Player just used a line 6 POD... and we mic'd the drummer.... virtually no bleed through... and i had my amp cranked... :)

good luck man...
__________________
4 Amps, 3 Acoustics, 2 Tele's, 1 Beautiful Baby Girl

Go play a Smith Custom Amplifier... you won't be sorry.

www.whowell.org
http://www.myspace.com/who_well
wierdOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 12:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Moderator
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Tim Armstrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Berlin, Maryland, USA
Age: 49
Posts: 9,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdOne View Post
The plexiglass is a good idea.... but...

In one of the bands I was in, we made some REALLY cheap baffle boxes... to put on top of the guitar amps....
Amen!!! I've used the exact same kind of thing, it works very well.

A friend actually uses an old refrigerator as an isolation box.

Slightly less effective, but certainly helpful, is the old studio standby, the "gobo", basically a sound-absorbing panel in between things being mic-ed.

Blankets work well for this, too. I stole an idea from another site, building a frame from PVC pipe to hang blankets to work as gobos...

Microphones are generally directional, and it helps to aim them so that they pick up what you want them to hear, and their null areas are pointed towards what you DON'T want them to pick up!

Cheers, Tim
__________________
http://www.moodswingers.org
Tim Armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 12:58 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
winny pooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: South London
Posts: 1,612
Positioning and dynamic mics. You can face the amps towards the drums and having the mics for each source facing away from each other will help as mics are least sensitive to background sound that is 180 degrees away.
The overheads for the drums will probably be condensers so you may have to have them in front of the drums facing the diaphragm towards the cymbals as they are the most sensitive. Keep the drums away from the wall or make sure that the wall is absorptive so that the reflections of the other sources don't enter your mics in that way. With a close miked amp and a dynamic mic, bleed is very minimal on guitar sources.
The process matters, you could try the common practice of laying drums and bass down first so that there will be no guitar bleed if you do choose to cut and paste.

BUT, remember that if you are tight enough to record the band as a whole then bleed is cool and the vibe from playing will be great. Have fun and report back when you have some tracks down.
__________________
my afro ambient side project:
http://www.myspace.com/theswyambusessions
winny pooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 01:08 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
These are some good ideas, thanks. it seems that anything that will muffle the sound between sources, and how you position the mics, will greatly impact the recording.

Wayne
wetland10 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 01:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
sax4blues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 596
You might want to consider other spaces in your home, not just the basement. We position ourselves around a bedroom/family room/garage area in my home. We put the amps in separate rooms and close the doors. This way we have a lot of flexibility for mic placement, both near and far. Even if you set up in the basement, run the amps upstairs.
sax4blues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 03:49 PM   #8 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
nicnite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 13
Good suggestions already about how to reduce bleed.

Consider also that bleed can be a GOOD thing. You might be surprised at how many classic albums (especially rock and jazz albums) have bleed all over the tracks. Often, well managed bleed can add ambiance and even positively affect timbre and freq. response.

I like to think more in terms of "managing bleed" reducing or eliminating it only when it's a problem. For a live feel, set up for a really nice sound in the room, and use a few baffles here and there, mainly to prevent too much guitar, keys, and bass from getting into the drum overheads.

Consider that for most live-based styles, the absolutely most important factor in a successful recording is a good performance. While great records are cut one track at a time, if you're going for a more live feel, having a situation where the players can really hear each other well, and respond to real dynamics, is usually much more important than reducing bleed.

I've done a bunch of live in the studio neo-soul albums where there was significant bass and guitar bleed into the drum overheads. Often this was part of the bass tone in the mix. We even sometimes used vocal takes that had the whole band bleeding into the track. We chose to do this for sonic reasons, sometimes due to lack of space, but most of all to get a good, dynamic, live feel in the performance with the band all close together, with no headphones.

With overheads (which are the main problem for bleed since they aren't right up on the source) you have the option to roll off all the bottom to deal with bass bleed. Depending on your style, you can also opt to close-mic the cymbals individually to reduce bleed instead of using overheads.

Keeping the overall band volume fairly low goes a long way toward reducing bleed as well.

At this link you'll find a bunch of tracks done in very small (untreated) rooms, with the entire band playing live and tons of bleed on every track. Check out "Rainy Day Special" where even the lead vocal is live with the band, and "Surrender" where everything except for a few guitar overdubs was cut live in an elementary school classroom.

http://nickjaffe.com/music-group-4.html

Just Nick
nicnite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 04:10 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicnite View Post
Good suggestions already about how to reduce bleed.

Consider also that bleed can be a GOOD thing. You might be surprised at how many classic albums (especially rock and jazz albums) have bleed all over the tracks. Often, well managed bleed can add ambiance and even positively affect timbre and freq. response.

I like to think more in terms of "managing bleed" reducing or eliminating it only when it's a problem. For a live feel, set up for a really nice sound in the room, and use a few baffles here and there, mainly to prevent too much guitar, keys, and bass from getting into the drum overheads.

Consider that for most live-based styles, the absolutely most important factor in a successful recording is a good performance. While great records are cut one track at a time, if you're going for a more live feel, having a situation where the players can really hear each other well, and respond to real dynamics, is usually much more important than reducing bleed.

I've done a bunch of live in the studio neo-soul albums where there was significant bass and guitar bleed into the drum overheads. Often this was part of the bass tone in the mix. We even sometimes used vocal takes that had the whole band bleeding into the track. We chose to do this for sonic reasons, sometimes due to lack of space, but most of all to get a good, dynamic, live feel in the performance with the band all close together, with no headphones.

With overheads (which are the main problem for bleed since they aren't right up on the source) you have the option to roll off all the bottom to deal with bass bleed. Depending on your style, you can also opt to close-mic the cymbals individually to reduce bleed instead of using overheads.

Keeping the overall band volume fairly low goes a long way toward reducing bleed as well.

At this link you'll find a bunch of tracks done in very small (untreated) rooms, with the entire band playing live and tons of bleed on every track. Check out "Rainy Day Special" where even the lead vocal is live with the band, and "Surrender" where everything except for a few guitar overdubs was cut live in an elementary school classroom.

http://nickjaffe.com/music-group-4.html

Just Nick
Thanks for the information, this is quite helpful as well. I had thought that bleed would have an impact on the ability to overdub because you would still hear the original source through the drum track. Maybe that isn't so much the case?

Wayne
wetland10 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 07:40 PM   #10 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
octatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: An Australian in London.
Posts: 1,669
There are lots of techniques for managing bleed but I assure you plexi-glass boxes are not one of them. Or MDF.
All you end up with is an extremely closed sound with lots of awful resonance at the resonant frequency of the materials used.
Styrofoam is completely useless.

Hypercardioid and Supercardioid mics are best when micing multiple cabs in one room- they are more directional than regular cardioid mics, hypercardioid being the narrowest.
The placement of the amps, drum kit and mics is the key.

What overheads are you using?
What Snare mics? Kick mics? Hihat? Toms?

If you give me more info I can make suggestions.
What style of music?
You can do all this with technique, you don't need to spend money on solutions (that won't work anyway).
What are the room dimensions?
Do you have any outboard?

One of the simplest ways to manage this is going to be to scratch guitar tracks with a DI'ed POD or similar sim and then re-track with real amps once you've done the drums.
There are a lot of other ways to manage it but I'll need more info before I can comment.
__________________
"A jazz musician is a juggler who uses harmonies instead of oranges." Benny Green
octatonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 8th, 2008, 10:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
nicnite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 13
Quote:
I had thought that bleed would have an impact on the ability to overdub because you would still hear the original source through the drum track. Maybe that isn't so much the case?
Well, yes, if you are planning to redo your basic tracks, it can be a problem. I was mostly talking about a production style where you record your basic tracks as a band, and overdub additional parts. For many bands I find it's really preferable to get as much down live as a unit as possible, but tastes and styles vary.

n
nicnite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 10:28 AM   #12 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicnite View Post
Well, yes, if you are planning to redo your basic tracks, it can be a problem. I was mostly talking about a production style where you record your basic tracks as a band, and overdub additional parts. For many bands I find it's really preferable to get as much down live as a unit as possible, but tastes and styles vary.

n
This is how we like to record, but sometimes it takes a few takes to get it right. Then we overdub an instrument and vocals here and there, sometimes A guitar solo. But, we are a bluesy rock bandand want to capture a live feel anyway. We have sort of a 60s British blues/rock band sound (think Stones, Faces, etc.).

Wayne
wetland10 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 03:01 PM   #13 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
nicnite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 13
Cool. Then I'd think the live in one room approach would work really well for that type of vibe. Just make sure your vocalist(s) don't bleed too much into the drum mics so you can overdub vocals freely, and you should be cool. Then the thing is to get a smoking hot take--a few mistakes aren't important if the take is hot.

n
nicnite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 03:09 PM   #14 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicnite View Post
Cool. Then I'd think the live in one room approach would work really well for that type of vibe. Just make sure your vocalist(s) don't bleed too much into the drum mics so you can overdub vocals freely, and you should be cool. Then the thing is to get a smoking hot take--a few mistakes aren't important if the take is hot.

n
Thanks for the information. Definitely important to have a good take. We will try to get it together at some point. Should be fun and interesting.

Wayne
wetland10 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 03:16 PM   #15 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Downtown Pensacola Florida... :)
Age: 31
Posts: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by octatonic View Post
You can do all this with technique, you don't need to spend money on solutions (that won't work anyway).
What doesn't work for you, is another guitar players standard operating procedure.

there are no definitives while talking about music (or the recording of it).
__________________
4 Amps, 3 Acoustics, 2 Tele's, 1 Beautiful Baby Girl

Go play a Smith Custom Amplifier... you won't be sorry.

www.whowell.org
http://www.myspace.com/who_well
wierdOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 03:30 PM   #16 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
octatonic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: An Australian in London.
Posts: 1,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by wierdOne View Post
What doesn't work for you, is another guitar players standard operating procedure.

there are no definitives while talking about music (or the recording of it).
Whilst there are no absolutes, you can't beat physics.
__________________
"A jazz musician is a juggler who uses harmonies instead of oranges." Benny Green
octatonic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 05:33 PM   #17 (permalink)
Moderator
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Tim Armstrong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Berlin, Maryland, USA
Age: 49
Posts: 9,654
I have used isolation boxes with good results.

I have used putting the amps in other rooms with good results.

I have used gobos and blankets with good results.

It pays to TRY stuff and make adjustments as needed...

Cheers, Tim
__________________
http://www.moodswingers.org
Tim Armstrong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 06:50 PM   #18 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
sax4blues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Age: 51
Posts: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by nicnite View Post
Cool. Then I'd think the live in one room approach would work really well for that type of vibe. Just make sure your vocalist(s) don't bleed too much into the drum mics so you can overdub vocals freely, and you should be cool. Then the thing is to get a smoking hot take--a few mistakes aren't important if the take is hot.n
We use headphones so the band is in one room with the drummer and the amps are cranked in other rooms. As said, watch the vocals in the overheads.
sax4blues is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 9th, 2008, 06:58 PM   #19 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 975
Years ago, my band decided to rent a mixer and some mics and record a demo with a home reel to reel deck. We were in a very small rehearsal space and had no baffles... we also played REALLY loud.

If there was any leakage, you couldn't tell. The recording sounded much better than any studio we paid for (low end studios, I admit). I wouldn't worry about leakage.
davidge1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 10th, 2008, 10:32 AM   #20 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 380
I may try the "moving blankets" approach and put them between the two guitar amps. Then just sing a scratch vocal track very low and that should keep it out of the overheard drum mics. Trial and error. Thanks for the thoughts.

Wayne
wetland10 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2008 All rights reserved.