Blackguard Pickup Specs - Telecaster Guitar Forum
The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.
   

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Other Discussion Forums > Just Pickups
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Just Pickups Forum for discussing guitar pickups.


Wilde Pickups by Bill & Becky Lawrence WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Amps, Mods, Pedals Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com seymourduncan.com


Forum Jump


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 2nd, 2013, 10:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Gringo13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: East Tennessee
Age: 34
Posts: 919
Blackguard Pickup Specs

After looking over some '53 Tele/Esquire specs from the Blackguard book, I noticed the average bridge output was 6.29 and the average neck output was 5.83. The highest bridge output was 7.29 with the lowest being 5.69. The hottest neck was 6.97 with the lowest being 4.93. A few questions:

Are these numbers indicative of the '52-'53 era or just a small glimpse? They seem much lower than what most pickup winders call their "Blackguard" pickups. Even Fender's OV pups are considerably hotter. Are pickup winders just responding to the demand for hotter pups or are most of the specs I found considerably low? Perhaps winders base their specs on the "hotter" side of vintage spec?

Were all bridge pups 42g wire and Alnico III in '52/'53. Were the neck pups Alnico II or III? They were all 43g wire, correct? What about the covers?... brass, brass chrome, something else?

Is the low output why vintage Tele pups sound sweet but new hotter neck pups sound muddy?

It just seems like so many people want "vintage tone", but then want to use hotter pickups than were on most vintage Teles. Then again, I'm just guessing here, so please set me straight.

__________________
"You'll never lose your mind as long as your heart always reminds you where you left it."- Mike Cooley

"I've always been crazy; it's kept me from going insane."- Ol' Waylon
Gringo13 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 6th, 2013, 05:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
 
AJBaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,347
I might be wrong, but I remember hearing that some neck pickups used 42g wire. 4.93kohms with 43 wire seems extremely low to me.

Last edited by AJBaker; February 6th, 2013 at 06:33 AM.
AJBaker is offline   Reply With Quote

Old February 6th, 2013, 07:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
JKjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: raleigh nc
Age: 55
Posts: 723
I don't know the answer to any of those questions, but once I stumbled upon low winds most of my hotter pickups found new homes. Sweetness and clarity. I can find the gain somewhere else if I need it, these days thats pretty easy. Having said that my favorite tele bridge is a Lollar Special,which is quite hot. But it never loses the sweet stuff, and sounds quite the Broadcaster with the volume backed off a hair.
JKjr is offline   Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links   #
Sponsored posting
 

Old February 6th, 2013, 07:19 PM   #4 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Low Lands
Posts: 252
From the website of Bare Knuckle pickups:

"For a very short period in '52 both bridge and neck coils were wound with 42AWG plain enamel and the Flat 52 set replicates this with a brighter, tighter sounding bridge coil and an open, almost Strat-like neck tone."

Covers were always chrome plated brass
Antoon is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


» Random Photo for Guests
0511081356
Untitled Document



 


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2014 All rights reserved.