|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Just Pickups Forum for discussing guitar pickups. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
cs nocaster bridge pickup... is it just me?
Anyone else out there satisfied with the nocaster neck, and underwhelmed with the bridge?
Specifically, in my guitar, it sounds kind of smeared in the mids. It seems like there is an unpleasant eq boost in certain low mid frequencies that can sound a bit muddy at times. The overall voicing is in the right neighborhood, but it's not articulate enough for me when I start pushing the amp. Has anyone else out there experienced this? Did anybody address it by pairing the neck pickup with a different bridge? If so, what did you use? I guess I should include the disclaimer that I've adjusted the height down and up and back down again. Lowering clears it up some, but I lose balance with the neck. Raising it just makes it turn into a muddy mess. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Athens, GA
Posts: 2,220
|
that's an immensely popular pickup 'round here; i adore it myself.
__________________
My band: The Pointed Firs |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: toledo
Posts: 6,003
|
-What is distance from strings...treble side, bass side....what type of wiring...
usually those are plug and play for classic tele bite.
__________________
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. Mark Twain |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Pressing down on the last fret, about 1/8" from the poles to the strings. '66 telecaster wiring (standard 3-way). 250k pots with .047 cap. Nothing out of the ordinary. If I go any lower, it loses too much output. I've gone higher and lower, and the current height seems to be as good as it's going to get in this guitar to suit my tastes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: toledo
Posts: 6,003
|
Hmm..
Are you underwhelmed from the lack of strength when you hit a note, not hot enough, or something else?
__________________
When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained. Mark Twain |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
I prefer the tone when the pickup is further from the strings, but then it starts sounding too tame, no edge. Nocaster bridge is supposed to be medium output, but I get way more grind from my '62 custom bridge pup. I think it's bright enough, and it has enough lows, but I don't dig the character of the midrange. Also, my D string seems quieter than the rest of the set, but that could just be my strings or setup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Quote:
It's lower than the Fender published specs, but it's not that far off. I don't know what others are getting on their nocaster pickups. It's not like the pickup sounds like it's from outer space or something, I'm just not quite over the moon with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 11th district
Posts: 655
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Thank you to all for the input. I changed strings the other day and tweaked the intonation a bit. I'm feeling a bit better about the nocaster bridge with a new set of strings on there. I'm still contemplating other options, but I'd like to keep the rwrp going on with the neck. So if I do swap out, I'll have to do some research or just change the set. They're staying put for now.
One thing I thought of trying to open the sound up a bit is to swap the rubber tubing for springs on the mounting screws (bridge only). Will I hear a difference? |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 61
Posts: 332
|
Doubt the tubing vs springs will make a real difference.
I have had certain pickup sets that hate pure nickel wound strings and prefer nickel plated steel (such as D'Addario XL's, GHS Boomers). The pure nickel tends to make the lower strings weaker and less focused (could be described as a bit muddy or if you prefer, vintagey mellow). If anything, the nickel plated strings will let you lower your pickup on the bass string side and not lose output level. Before you change pickups, a different set of strings would be a worthwhile thing to try. George |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: May 2012
Location: In the South, U.S.A.
Age: 58
Posts: 1,160
|
Quote:
All plain strings and the cores for the wound strings are stainless steel. The wrap is where the different alloys are used. Stainless steel wrapped strings are the brightest, the steel/nickel alloys are in the middle and the pure nickel wounds are the warmest.
__________________
Sometimes I wonder: When they invented the alphabet, how did they know what order to put it in? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | ||
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maplewood, NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 1,109
|
Quote:
Quote:
The '62 also does seem to have more output hitting the front end of my amps than the '51 Nocaster bridge and it has more character and is more lively too. I think many folks here will agree that Tele pickup performance has everything to do with the whole signal chain as well as the wood and hardware in a guitar. Some pickups sound good or bad with certain bridge assemblies and certain body and neck wood, size, weight and resonance (BTW, I only use D'Addario XL's). The '62 bridge is great with any combination of the above. I think it is Fender's most under-rated bridge pickup. I would pair it with the '51 Nocaster neck pickup which is one of my favorite Tele neck pickups out if any I've tried but I am so sick of A/b-ing and taking apart and reassembling my Teles I think I just might sell the Nocasters and move on. Of course they are among the most beloved set on this forum so YMMV.
__________________
Someday I'll quote someone... |
||
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.