|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Just Pickups Forum for discussing guitar pickups. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 151
|
Pickup Recommendations for a MIJ All Rosewood Tele
Hi guys,
I'm reposting this thread because now I'm looking for opinions in general, not a specific comparison. I could really use your help please and I apologize for the long post. I'm looking to upgrade the pickups in my '86 MIJ All Rosewood Tele. There are so many choices out there and I'm really struggling with making a decision. I'm trying to seek opinions on what pickups you think would sound best with this type of wood and for what I would like to hear. I’m hoping that some of you can help and/or may have any experience with this type of application...or could simply recommend something based on this info. As far as I know, I think the current pickups are late 80's Fender AM Std. The stock Japan ones are long gone. FWIW, I did manage to get the readings on the current pickups: 7.7K for the neck and 7.4K for the flat-pole bridge pickup. Not sure about the type of magnets though…maybe A5? I also want to upgrade because the pickup wires are of terrible quality and they were cut pretty short. Plus, not knowing exactly what’s in there doesn’t sit well with me either. With that, I would like to start from scratch, especially if I need to do something else in the future. At least I’ll have the knowledge and foundation to go by if I decide to make any further changes. It is a great sounding guitar, but I know it could probably even better since there is nothing special about these pickups. I've been trying to do some general research about the tonal characteristics of the Rosewood Tele and some have mentioned that it’s very bright, kind of mid-scooped and kind of thin sounding. I can agree, especially with the bridge pickup, but it’s also very nice and clear. I’m OK with that pickup, but it probably could use touch more bottom/mids. I’ve also read some mention that the guitar can sound real warm too (I think that might have been said because people think of Rosewood as a generally warmer tone in regards to the fretboard, but I don’t think that's the case being solid Rosewood). The neck pickup is kind of lackluster, a bit muddy & undefined and not real sweet, especially in comparison to my '52 RI, but that's a totally different animal. So, I may need a bridge pickup with a bit more mids or beef I think, but not too much. I like a bright, twangy bridge...more of a traditional/vintage type tone, but with some bottom and sort of ballsy. I think that maybe some pickups with a little stronger midrange accent would help, but then again, I don’t want it to be too middy or dark sounding at all. I'm looking for a neck pup that is not dark, has nice clarity and just simply sounds sweet in accordance to this guitar. I would like the pickups to be nicely balanced...sound great clean and overdriven. I will consider anything at this point, but I don’t want something that has a waiting list. I would like to find some pickups that sound great off the shelf. I'm just looking for nice overall upgrade that will work well with this Tele. It would be very helpful to narrow down the search. Thanks alot! Troy |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
NEW MEMBER!
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bordeaux, France
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
So I really recommend you have a look at BKPs - from your description, I think you might be interested in either the Yardbirds, Brown Sugar or (hotter) The Boss sets, but by all mean drop a mail to Tim (who build these pups) explaining what you want and what you don't - the guy really knows its stuff and is usually spot-on with pups choice. HTH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 151
|
Thanks fir the suggestion Bigbee, I may look into that. At the moment, I'm leaning towards either the Lollar Vintage T or Fralin stock. With that, can anyone offer any opinions on those two pickups? Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Massapequa, New York
Age: 23
Posts: 590
|
+1000 but get your pickups from kleinpickups.com theyre much cheaper and they have a very wide selection. Also the pickups arent mass produced like SD does. Chris winds all pickups to order
__________________
It's true i've lost my marbles and I can't remember where i've put them |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 151
|
BritishBlues Boy, do you find your Rosewood Tele to be a brighter guitar or is it just me? If this is indeed considered a brighter guitar, maybe I should consider the Fralin 5%/2% overwinds? In the vid below, he says uses them in the "brighter guitar". I'm glad to hear that the Fralins are working out for you.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcRFet_iDkk JD0x0, I've heard of Klein...I'll take a look at those. Chrismo, I'm really not considering Duncans at this time, but thank you. Thanks guys! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Doctor of Teleocity
|
Hey Troy, yes, I suppose my Rosewood is fairly bright but I reckon either set would sound great in your Tele. Just a matter or personal taste really. I always find myself tweaking the tone control on all my Tele's anyway so I can dial in just the right amount of brightness/warmth anyway...
__________________
BBB. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Massapequa, New York
Age: 23
Posts: 590
|
Quote:
__________________
It's true i've lost my marbles and I can't remember where i've put them |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 151
|
Thanks BBB...oh, I forgot to ask you were your stock Fralins a special order with the staggered poles?
JD0x0, thanks for the info and that makes alot of sense. It's a pretty heavy guitar too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 151
|
Hmmm...I was just doing some research about flat poles vs. staggered and I've decided to go with flat poles. Here's a good description from the Lollar site:
If you compared a flat pole pickup to a staggered pole pickup wound the same way, you would get a little more presence ( like a Fender Amp presence knob), a little more bass and a little more overall output from the flat pole pickup. Another way to think about it is that a flat pole pickup will generate a little more output without putting more wire on the pickup coil. Adding more wire changes the frequency response, usually by losing some treble and gaining some bass. If you are already use to using staggered pole pickups, you may find that you will need to turn the bass down slightly on the amplifier because with a flat pole pickup you will no longer have to make up for weak low strings. In most cases the flat pole pickup will give you a better string balance. The high E won't get buried in the mix like a staggered pole pickup can. You will also notice that the two low strings are louder than a staggered pole set, and the G string does not overpower the others. Staggered poles create more of a smeared tone when you play more than one note at a time—you may or may not like it. On a staggered pole pickup the low strings rarely overpower any amp, but they can also sound somewhat subdued or weak. The volume on the G string tends to dominate all others. If you have previously played using only staggered poles and you don't notice any discrepancies with string-to-string volume balance, you have learned to compensate for them. If you decide to try a flat pole set, it may take some time to adapt but once you get familiar with the sound, you'll find they work better in most cases than a staggered pole design. For example, all teles up until around 1956 had flat poles—no one ever comments that their 1952 telecaster has bad string balance. Also, most Telecasters, Jazzmaster, Mustangs and Fender bass guitars have historically had flat pole pickups. On Gibson guitars no one ever staggers the adjustable poles as much as strat pickups. The staggered would be nice to make it look period correct, but I certainly don't want it to thinner and brighter. Here are a few pics of the guitar: ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Massapequa, New York
Age: 23
Posts: 590
|
i like the look, feel, and sound of non staggered polepieces better.
And i doubt anyone is going to go up to you after a gig and say "those polepieces arent staggered like they should be. thats wrong!" btw is that neck bare or finished?
__________________
It's true i've lost my marbles and I can't remember where i've put them |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Massapequa, New York
Age: 23
Posts: 590
|
that like ruins the whole point of an all rosewood neck
i have an all pau ferro neck on my guitar thats unfinished. i swear im buying 3 of these and putting them on the rest of my guitars. it's sooooo smooth and not sticky at all and i love the natural feel of it. if i had your guitar i'd sand all that finish off, i wouldnt care about value or anything just the feel of it would be worth it
__________________
It's true i've lost my marbles and I can't remember where i've put them |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 151
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.