|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Just Pickups Forum for discussing guitar pickups. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Illinois
Age: 34
Posts: 24
|
Best P90 Pickups Currently on Market?
Hi. Looking for opinions regarding P90 pickups for my goldtop 56 reissue les paul. I'm currently using the Gibby's which don't sound too bad, but I can't help but wonder if there is something better out there. I play classic rock, blues, some jazz. I like clean tones and edge of break tones. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Colchester, England, UK
Posts: 1,169
|
I've compared Gibson's P90s with Seymour Duncan and prefer the Gibbos - BY FAR!!!
They sound great in a Les Paul btw. Maybe consider changing something else down the line, like speakers for example? Good luck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North of The Wall
Age: 24
Posts: 1,406
|
organic is such a silly term.
P90s are hard to mess up. I have played anything from the gibsons, duncans, dimarzios, and lollars. I love the lollars because I could switch magnet type. But for me its all about the ceramic p90s. They twang harder, get nice and raunchy but can be smooth and clean when I rolled back or ease up on my right hand. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: hillsborough,NC
Age: 58
Posts: 93
|
I recommend Vintage Vibe; you can switch the magnets and Pete is a great guy: he will answer any question, try to give advice on how to get the sound you're after and build whatever you want at a reasonable price. Bil
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Organic to my ears = natural, musical, complex.
That's how I hear the Antiquity P90s I've used. They capture a 'broken-in' vibe that most new pickups don't. I can't say the same for stock Gibson/Duncans I compared them too. Plus they look like they have been sweated on, or buried in the groud. So I'm sticking with organic |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CHICAGO, IL.
Posts: 3,587
|
Gibson and Wolfetone P90's are my favorites. I swapped several P90 pickups in and out of my guitars, and before I settled on these two as my faves I had: Lollar, Harmonic Design and Seymour Duncan.
The Lollars are good, but a bit "sterile" sounding to me. Harmonic Design P-90's are just plain bad (to me) and I generally love HD pups (just not the P90). By "bad" I mean that whenever I had those pickups (vp90) in one of my guitars (and I had the same P90 set in two different ones), I was always fiddling around with the tone knob to dial out some annoying frequency. Happened in both guitars. The Duncans I had were one of the overwound, "hot" P90's that came stock with one of my guitars. Honky and horrible. Never tried the Antiquity. I suspect that would have been more to my liking. I took the stock Gibson P90's out of my Historic Les Paul, thinking there "had to be something better" even though I liked them. I ended up switching back to the Gibsons. Booteek is NOT always better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CHICAGO, IL.
Posts: 3,587
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 27
|
Has anyone compared the new production Gibsons, Lollars etc. to the vintage P90ish pickups such as Harmony/Silvertone Gibson P13:s or the Kay Barney Kessel pickups? I bought a Silvertone Espanada and a Kay Swingmaster and I absolutely love the sound of both guitars but as they really aren't the hi-end of luthiering I'd like to find the pickups to match those as I'd like to get the same sound from my newer archtops. Any suggestions?
He're are the P90:s I've tried so far: - Gibson P90: Fat and really middy, brilliant on the bridge with the pole pieces really close to the strings but for some reason I couldn't get these to sound good on the neck, they seem to have lots of upper middle but not enough presence - Sheptone P90: Skinnier sounding than the Gibsons but for some reason I couldn't dial out some shrill upper-mid-range that annoyed me - GFS P90: These don't sound like P90 to me at all, really thin single-coil sound that actually resemble the Fender texas special strat pickups, only louder. I actually have the on a tele and I love these pickups in it, they sound bright and clear, just not P90:ish - Ludgren P90, 10% underwound: Smokey smooth, funny compressed fat sound but still enough highs to sound good clean, I guess this one's closest to the Gibson P13 of the ones I've tried - Gibson P13 on Silvertone 1427: Brilliant, fat and thick with funny down-to-earth feeling, unbelievably dynamic to the extent you really have to watch your picking. Really "organic" sounding with lots of harminic content, these make a clean amp sound like it's on the edge of break-up - Kay Barney Kessel: A bit brighter and cleaner than the P13:s but they have the same feeling to the P13:s. Lots of harmonic over/undertones which I guess make the "organic" sound.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2005
Location: CHICAGO, IL.
Posts: 3,587
|
Quote:
One thing I like about the Wolfetone pickups is that he uses Alnico II magnets (instead of alnico V like most use). Alnico II mags were used on the very earliest P-90's. It's a slightly less punchy sound, but you get more sustain (due to less string pull) and a smoother breakup. Clean sounds are way better than any alnico V I've tried. I've heard that the Fralin P-90's are really nice, and somewhat like the Gibsons in terms of overall flavor. I've never actually tried them though. That may be an option if you like the basic flavor of the Gibbys but want something slightly different (plus the neck pickup will be slightly underwound, so they match better, something the stock Gibson P090 does not have). Happy hunting. |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.