Telecaster Guitar Forum
IMPORTANT: Treat everyone with respect, no matter how difficult that may be. No hate, politics, religion, sex or drug discussions.
No Commercial Posts: Do not use the TDPRI to buy or sell anything.
Telecaster Guitar Resources Guitar T-shirts
Guitar Tuner
6
E
5
A
4
D
3
G
2
B
1
E
Telecaster Music Shop

Telecaster Guitars at Ebay Musician's Friend Stupid Deal of the Day






Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Other Discussion Forums > Just Pickups
Home Forum Resources Shop Gallery Classifieds Reviews Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Just Pickups Forum for discussing guitar pickups.

Forum Jump

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 6th, 2008, 02:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Age: 57
Posts: 95
Pots for a P-90 Pickup

Does Gibson use 250K audio or 500K audio pots on their guitars with P-90 pickups?

Thanks,
Ken
tube tone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6th, 2008, 09:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
DrewB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 841
500K is correct for P-90s. Gibson might use 300Ks, but I don't know that for certain. Gibson's pots are poop, for the most part. CTS 500Ks are the way to go.
__________________
There is no substitute for Sound Pressure Level
DrewB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 02:11 AM   #3 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
metulmykul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 265
My Squier Tele Custom II has 500k's in there which i left when i changed the p'ups to hotter SD P90s.

I think i may have read what DrewB said also about the 300k's...
__________________
"Amps should have an on/off switch and a f***king volume and tone. If you get a really fancy one, it should have reverb on/off..."

S.P Jones
metulmykul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 08:36 AM   #4 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewB View Post
Gibson's pots are poop, for the most part.
Please elaborate.
__________________
WARNING:This post may contain items including, but not limited to, sarcasm, irony, hyperbole intended to bring humor to this discussion. Those of you who are overly sensitive or who have no sense of humor are better off ignoring this post.
e-merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 08:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
Wardpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Age: 43
Posts: 583
CTS 1Meg pots are the best way to go. Let all that nice single-coil top end sizzle through! Tone wide open, P90s can sound like G&L's or even Tele pickups with a CAP'ed volume pot to adjust down the volume a little.

Seriously, get the 1Megs.
Wardpike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 12:49 PM   #6 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
DrewB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 841
Quote:
Originally Posted by e-merlin View Post
Please elaborate.
I'm not sure who manufactures the pots they use in the regular production line. Some of the Custom Shop guitars have the same pots.

- The pots are cheaply made; it's not hard to damage one when you're soldering. I actually had an input lug on a volume pot fall off (the plastic melted) when I was changing out a capacitor, and I have done a lot of soldering, so it's not like I don't know what I'm doing.
- Their use of 300K volume pots is another head-scratcher. How many Gibsons have you played in shops that have neck pickups that never make it out of the mud zone? Look no further than the control cavity. This is holdover from the cost-center Norlin era and limits the guitar's tonal range.
- Gibson seems to like using linear-taper pots for their volume controls, which is a lesser consideration that the actual quality of the pots, but they react differently than audio-taper (standard) pots, which can be a nuisance if you are one of the people that actually uses a volume control dynamically.

I'll grant that the first point is the only one that actually incriminates the pots as "poop," but the other two "choices" deserve honorable mentions. I love Gibsons and have been primarily a Gibson player for almost 20 years, but I'm not blind to their apparent cluelessness about some critical pieces of the puzzle. If you get a guitar 90% of the way "there," why limit how much you can close the remaining 10% gap in the name of saving $2.50 or less?!
__________________
There is no substitute for Sound Pressure Level
DrewB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 01:08 PM   #7 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,438
Thanks.
__________________
WARNING:This post may contain items including, but not limited to, sarcasm, irony, hyperbole intended to bring humor to this discussion. Those of you who are overly sensitive or who have no sense of humor are better off ignoring this post.
e-merlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 01:24 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Western Maryland
Posts: 1,285
Unless I am mistaken, Gibson used to use decent quality CGE pots.
Either Gibson has gone to cheaper pots....or CGE pots aren't what they used to be?

Steve
6942 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7th, 2008, 01:27 PM   #9 (permalink)
Tele-Holic
 
DrewB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 841
I'm not sure who the OEM is. Some of the Custom Shop guitars get CTS pots, which is what I use in all my own guitars.
__________________
There is no substitute for Sound Pressure Level
DrewB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 04:31 PM   #10 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: en la cantina
Posts: 90
My experience:
I mounted a p90 in the the neck of my tele. First with stock 250k pots, later added brighter caps, then changed to 300k and stayed for a while... until I played a squier custom II to find that in comparison my antiquity p90 sounded muffled, lacking much high end I have just changed the tone for a 500k but still it sounds muffled in comparison to the squier... so i guess I'll have to go for both 500k pots... or maybe even a 1Meg tone as someone suggested above?
carlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8th, 2008, 10:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
Tele-Meister
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 260
I've settled on 500K volume and 1meg tone pots for P-90s, with a treble bleed circuit on the volume. It still sounds fat, but with the volume rolled down and the tone up it can still cop a pseudo Fender single coil sound.
Al Nico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2008, 04:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: en la cantina
Posts: 90
Quote:
...I played a squier custom II to find that in comparison my antiquity p90 sounded muffled, lacking much high end I have just changed the tone for a 500k but still it sounds muffled in comparison...
Well, I went for a 500k volume pot and restrung the guitar, and it's night and day... to a big extent due to the new strings! it's funny how you sometimes focus on the wrong problem. However I have to say that to my ears the squier neck pup sounds up to par to the antiquity it has a higher output and sounds somewhat brighter and punchier.
carlos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 11th, 2008, 04:35 PM   #13 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
 
JohnnyCrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lost Angeles and Orange County
Posts: 6,915
All three of my Gibsons have great pots in them. Even my two non-CustomShop Gibsons.

I have a 2000, 2001, and a CShop 2001.

P-90s use 500k pots, although OLD Gibsons use to use 330k pots in some of them, even the humbucker'ed ones.
JohnnyCrash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12th, 2008, 10:55 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tele-Afflicted
 
OaklandA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyCrash View Post
All three of my Gibsons have great pots in them. Even my two non-CustomShop Gibsons.

I have a 2000, 2001, and a CShop 2001.

P-90s use 500k pots, although OLD Gibsons use to use 330k pots in some of them, even the humbucker'ed ones.
Same here.

I have a VOS R7, '62 SG RI, and a LP Classic Antique Mahogany (GOTW #33) and all have very good, high quality pots. Far as I know they're 500k as well.

Maybe the Faded series or Studios use cheaper stuff.

And 500k would definitely be the way to go with P-90's. I had a '98 LP Special for awhile...it had stock 500k Gibson potsand, again, seemed to be fine quality-wise.


.
__________________
__________________________________


"Yeah, well, you know,...that's just, like, your opinion, man."

The Dude
OaklandA is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump

Reply


Thread Tools



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Forums Directory

The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2006 All rights reserved.