|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Epic Threads We have a few "epic" threads containing thousands of posts. Known as Green Light threads because of the Green "Amp Jewel Light" indicating threads with more than 500 posts. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#81 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: toronto
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
just because some people seem to be happy with 100$-$300 guitars doesn't mean everyone will be, just as not everyone will be automatically happy with $1500 and up guitars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 210
|
I think if you want to look at the standard of excellence in FMIC, it (for now) is still MIA Fender product. Think about it: even in the CV series, heralded as the best that Squier has offered since the JV era, has some serious QC issues it hasn't worked out yet. Yes, for the most part the fretwork is incredible, and yes, for the most part the pickups and electronics are fantastic even stock...but we are getting lots of CVs in stores with dead pickups.
I LOVE my CV50. It is hands down the best Fender product I've owned, including MIA. But I had to search pretty hard to get the right one, and the disparity between the one I bought (2008 serial) and some of the ones I tried (2010 serials) was massive. Not that the 2010 stuff was particularly bad, but I can tell from the earlier models that they really took their time and produced a product that would garner a lot of attention. Once that attention was caught and they started shipping in volume, we have dead pickups, thicker finishes and shady electronics (in some models, still not the majority). When you hang the medal of "standard of excellence" on any product, it at least indicates that there is an inherent consistency to the product. I think Squier is quickly becoming a strong brand with fantastic product, and I think that is because of competition at the lower price points of guitar production (as others have touched on before). Now, I own a CV50. I love my CV50. It is AT LEAST as good as most MIA standards. The difference between the MIA standard and the CV is the fact that if you pick up any MIA in a (non-Guitar Center) dealer, and A/B it with any CV, chances are the MIA will consistently be a nice, well made guitar, and the Squier will have one or two small issues. I'm not crazy about some of the fretwork coming out of Corona recently, but almost every single guitar that gets out of the factory there has very nice fit and finish to it, the electronics work very well and the stock pickups are fantastic. They accomplish all of that at a consistently high level at volume. I think Squier is quickly becoming the best Fender you can get that isn't MIA. While I still think MIA is the standard by which all Fenders should be judged, I think that with the advent of certain models, it is becoming quite difficult to construct a non-political argument against Squier.
__________________
Guitars: 1981 Hamer USA Special, Squier Classic Vibe 50's Telecaster, Cort NTL-20 Amp and Gear: Vox AC4TV8 with V112TV cab, Electro-Harmonix Holy Grail Nano |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 55
|
Standard of excellence,nope,no way.A nice budget fender style guitar,yes...Squier's are cool for the kids and people on a budget.When they learn to play and get more money they will buy a real Fender.If not,it's not much of an investment.That's the way the cookie crumbles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,400
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
[QUOTE=telewhacker24_7;3103743]Standard of excellence,nope,no way.A nice budget fender style guitar,yes...Squier's are cool for the kids and people on a budget.When they learn to play and get more money they will buy a real If not,it's not much of an investment.That's the way the cookie crumbles.[/QUOTE]
Oh..I see, thanks for sheding that light on this thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,706
|
When I bought my CV50 at Guitar Center, it played better than every guitar I ompared it with. Granted, GC avoids set ups at all costs, I wouldn't see any need to pay more money for a similar guitar. 2 CV50s, an Affinity, a few MIM Teles, and a couple American Teles I tried out and I bought the, by far, best playing guitar. I'd assume Squier is hit or miss and Fender is less "dud-y".
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
I never had a problem with the frets, intonation, anything like that on the MIM or CIJ...both were very nice. My problem was with the tone when playing full volume w/the band. I use a fully serviced/stock 1971 Pro Reverb w/the OCD or ZVEX Distortron or TS9 or ZVEX fuzz factory and Fulltone Fat Boost (whatever the newest version is). I was just never stoked about they way they sounded in a band/gig setting. it did work well w/my Princeton in much lower volume hired gun female singer/songwriter gigs but that was very sparse/subtle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,060
|
I've been doing a song via the internet with an old buddy in Ohio, and recording rhythm tracks clean, I'm finding my CV50 has a nicer and more "chimey" tone than my '52 AVRI. Doing the same track on both guitars in the middle position, the CV just sparkles more (both with tone full on). The pine body seems to have a brighter/sharper tone unplugged as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Austin
Posts: 70
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moorpark, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 60
|
I would have to respectfully disagree as well.
Although the quality of the Squier line has improved tremendously over the past few years, I feel that the MIM Fenders are the best overall quality guitars in the Fender line up. You are always going to find guitars made in all the Fender plants that have minor quality control issues, but to me the Mexico plant makes the most consistanly fine instruments. The last three guitars I have purchased have all been MIM guitars. Great value for the money, but most importantly, the best bang for the buck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
RE: $29 Teiscos - Think about it. The only thing that's changed over the years, is that the quality of Asian guitars has increased astronomically. But, even 40 years ago, my '70 Tele still cost me 8 times that of the $29 Teisco. And today, a CS Tele will cost you the same 8 times that of a CV.
__________________
PJ "I don't know if it's art, but I like it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#97 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
|
Right now I have to equate the guitars were seeing out of China, to the late 60's/early 70's guitars we saw out of Japan: SERIOUS CONTENDERS! And many of us had blinders on during this era.
And what I really mean by that is, those with "refined tastes" in guitars are experiencing a "Deja-vu" in the sense that the Japanese quality began matching what the US was producing, and yet many only quietly said to themselves, "Wow, this is serious!", but publicly still proclaimed, "Its not like a US made guitar." China is studious and goal driven. It is embedded into their society, much like Japan was in the 60's-70's. Remember how awesome Japanese manufactured guitars where by the early 80's? Well, I think China may just be on the precipice of repeating this. Deja-vu............... |
|
|
|
|
|
#98 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Clermont Florida
Age: 73
Posts: 92
|
I say this too often, but I have made my living as a guitarist for 53 years. I played my CV50 at an outdoor gig yesterday at gig volume, I left it in the car overnight,(this is in Florida about 80% yesterday and maybe 55 last night.) I hooked it up today and it was still in tune from yesterday, so do not tell me the CV50 does not stay in Tune!
The neck is thin, that is fine with me, and the frets are fantastic. Stu |
|
|
|
|
|
#99 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
A problem with China, is that they have (in many cases), less adherence to the patent and trademark laws of other countries. And, as an international trade partner, that presents some problems. In America, our system depends on those laws for legal trade. Ever see the current run of knock-off Fender & Gibson stuff finding its way over here? That's going to force more company-owned factories - to try to protect designs, trade secrets & other intellectual property. (IMO)
__________________
PJ "I don't know if it's art, but I like it." |
|
|
|
|
|
#100 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.