|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Bad Dog Cafe Hershey's Bad Dog Cafe is our Off Topic forum -- but NO POLITICS and NO FIGHTING. NOTE: Discussion of guitars other than Tele & Strat belongs in the "Other Guitars" forum and discussion of Music belongs in the "Music to Your Ears" forum. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver
Age: 56
Posts: 741
|
Would the Beatles have been better with Keith instead of George?
So proposition: Beatles John, Paul, Ringo and Keith Richards.
Positive: Keith kicks Paul's a**. No Honey Pie. Negative: Maybe no Layla album. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 31
Posts: 929
|
I don't think Richards has the melodic sensibility or vocal ability to mesh with the mop tops, on the other hand, he probably would've had an affair with Yoko. Not sure what kind of chaos that would've caused.
__________________
"If you love these blues, play 'em as you please."- Mike Bloomfield |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Manhattan, Kansas
Age: 50
Posts: 1,038
|
The question might be better if Brian Jones were the one replacing Harrison...
When I hear Richard's playing in '64 and think of what Harrison was doing then (on similiar rockers like 'Roll over Beethoven'.....and then the added virtuosity demonstated on songs like 'Til There was You'....I prefer Harrison with the Beatles) |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
|
Sorry, I just don't think that Keith Richards is all that good - not that George was exactly a guitar god himself, but he was adequate and could sing harmony.
And Keith wasn't from Liverpool, so the others would have kicked his little cockney butt! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: California
Age: 58
Posts: 6,875
|
Quote:
__________________
I don't need no I.D.,I know who I am,I'm Tommy Bolin! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Austin, TX
Age: 31
Posts: 929
|
When I think Keef I think riffs not necessarily melody. Mick Taylor and Billy Keys are responsible for my favorite Melodies in Stone songs. The Stones have some good ones but not as diverse and complex melodies as The Beatles though. At least in my opinion.
__________________
"If you love these blues, play 'em as you please."- Mike Bloomfield |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 2,845
|
I have this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Legends-Rock-G.../dp/0825603099 The George Harrison Chapter is titled: GEORGE HARRISON: Was He The Best? The Keith Richards Chapter is titled: KEITH RICHARDS: Glue For The Stones. Sums it up for me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Detroit
Posts: 6,352
|
But if you posed the question in reverse, J P G R (one of them) subbing into the Stones ?
On this forum ? You'd have some takers. I mean c'mon ! They're the St Beatles ! Any one of them could improve any band ! Quote:
No - music hall dreck like like Rocky Raccoon, When I'm 64, Honey Pie, Martha My Dear, Yellow Submarine, etc...
__________________
Geeshie Wiley is my co-pilot |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.