|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | T-Shirts & Etc | Music | Photos | Classifieds | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Bad Dog Cafe Hershey's Bad Dog Cafe is where Off Topic Discussion is welcomed -- but please follow our rules and stay away from subjects that turn political or have caused fights in the past. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
DTV - Great tool - FREE!
So, I bought two DTV converters with my government coupons. At the register, the total cost was about $10.70 for two converters with the coupons applied.
My TV antenna was mounted in the attic by the previous owners of my home. As I look around the neighborhood, I realize that there are no other antenna mounted on rooftops. But I am not getting all the channels and a couple are pixelated every once in a while. It occures to me that I either need a booster or more height. I do some Internet research and find this very cool website: www.tvfool.com I enter my address and approximate the height my antenna is off the ground (16 feet). Low and behold, I am about 32~34 miles from the main broadcast towers. That is a definate need for height. 30 miles is on the fringes. The chart shows that I only have two strong signals and very few moderate signals. This supports what I am experiencing on my TV sets. I then enter 30 feet off the ground as a new height. BAM! Suddenly, there is about 25 stations with very strong signals. Amazing. This website also tells me the exact direction to point my antenna. Since angles are always the same no matter how far, I place a straight edge on my monitor screen at the desired angle and hold it there. I then go to Google map and look up my address and change to satelite image mode. I zoom in and notice that the water tower that I have been concerned about is not in the LOS (Line Of Sight). Yet, a school and two buildings a 1/2 mile away are. I notice that I can aim the antenna right between the two buildings and at a clear reference point on the school across the street. I just got off the roof from moving and positioning the antenna. I used all of this gathered data to help me adjust the position of my aim. PRESTO!!! I have 25 very clear DTV channels now. I spent about 30 minutes gathering the data and 1-1/2 hours moving the antenna. From what I read, antenna technicians charge $50~$75/hour. I just saved myself $150 and have excellent DTV reception now. Just thought I would pass it forward. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 62
Posts: 1,799
|
Quote:
Sorry if these questions betray ignorance: I'll plead ignorance from the get-go. "The only dumb question is the one you don't ask." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
That's the beauty of it. The FCC requires that DTV is to be accessed for free, just like the analog of the past. Of coarse there are far fewer channels of interest than cable or satelite. We live in a world of expenses here in America. It is nice that the FCC is still requiring free anything.
Something else I learned, there are federal laws that override home owner associations and city ordaninaces that gives the citizen the right to errect external antenna or dish. Apparently, the FCC feels this is far more important than home owners associations that tried to restrict the cosmetics of a neigborhood. Receiving free TV/radio signal for public information is a critical US right, just like free 911 service (though you must pay for a phone service in general). |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
I was certainly delighted to see the upgraded signal on my TV tubes. The colors are richer and very few transmission artifacts. The image is much sharper. By contrast, the signal on my local cable has ghosts, is streaky and video noise that we just seemed to tolerate for so long. It has been said that this digital upgrade is as significant as upgrading from B&W to color broadcast back in the 1960s. I would have to agree. Thanks Westerly Sunn for that additional link. Footnote: Folks should not confuse DTV with HDTV. Many TV stations are concurrently offerring HDTV (High Definition) broadcasts for some programming - like their news and football games. HDTV offers a much higher resolution than DTV, except only HDTV equiped TV sets can benefit from the higher resolution. But the DTV signal has a higher resolution than the analog and is more clear. My DTV converter box does not have HDMI connection (Why would a converter need HDMI if the TV cannot display?). HDMI is for feeding HDTV signal from a device like Blue Ray, or a HDTV cable/satelite box. I have yet to learn if an HDTV ready TV set can get a HDTV signal from just an antenna coax cable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneeeesoooottta
Posts: 1,332
|
Quote:
__________________
'63 CS Tele, HW1 Texas Tele, EJ Strat, MIJ JM, Epi Casino (AlnicoV), Gibson SG Robot, Gibson LP DC Studio, Steinberger, Squier PBass (heavily modded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneeeesoooottta
Posts: 1,332
|
Quote:
Most of the primetime shows are in full HD these days. CBS and NBC are in 1080i, ABC and FOX are in 720p. MOST, not all, stations also run a side channel or two. The NBCs stations usually have a Weather Plus side channel. PBS stations run 2-3 channels. If you get a new set I'd recommend a 1080p set so you get all the lines of the 1080i, but when watching 720p you get all the non-interlaced goodness. The ATSC standard (8VSB) is 19.3Mb/s total bitrate. What that means is that each station has that many bits to make up their picture. More side channels equals less bits on the main channel. Most side channels only run 2-3Mb/s though. Here's a good link on ATSC: http://broadcastengineering.com/mag/...atsc_standard/
__________________
'63 CS Tele, HW1 Texas Tele, EJ Strat, MIJ JM, Epi Casino (AlnicoV), Gibson SG Robot, Gibson LP DC Studio, Steinberger, Squier PBass (heavily modded) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Thanks for the info SMPTE.
I did not acknowledge the really tall towers. I am mostly concerned about the TV signal in the local region. I have a high roof line, thus a high chimney. My antenna is only about 6 feet higher than my chimney. There are trees all around me that are still higher than my antenna. On your second reply, are you saying that HDTV can be recieved by my antenna through the coax if my TV can decode and display the signal? I already know my converter box cannot. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minneeeesoooottta
Posts: 1,332
|
Quote:
Your BEST digital signal is off air. Period. All Stop. End of Argument.
__________________
'63 CS Tele, HW1 Texas Tele, EJ Strat, MIJ JM, Epi Casino (AlnicoV), Gibson SG Robot, Gibson LP DC Studio, Steinberger, Squier PBass (heavily modded) |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.