|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Bad Dog Cafe Hershey's Bad Dog Cafe is where Off Topic Discussion is welcomed -- but please follow our rules and stay away from subjects that turn political or have caused fights in the past. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,368
|
Doyle Bramhall 2 When I pushed this song forwards for my band to cover it, our leadsinger went: "Well I'll be, that's a Hendrix song I never heard before."
__________________
"I reject your reality and subsitute my own." - Adam Savage, Mythbusters |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Portland, Oregon
Age: 61
Posts: 1,649
|
I've heard people say that Hendrix was the first to play the guitar as an ELECTRIC and ELECTRONIC instrument, but that's not really true. Les Paul, great as he was, explored electronics, but his guitar was just an amplified solid body guitar. The first guitarist I remember hearing who made my ears prick up with sounds that were more than just amplified strings was Stephen Stills with some of his work with Buffalo Springfield and CS&N. His Buffalo Springfield work predates Hendrix (at least in the U.S.) by about a year. CS&N hit the scene about the same time as Hendrix.
And, while, they were never groundbreaking, The Ventures used fuzztone way before Hendrix or Stills on The 2000 lb Bee. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Doctor of Teleocity
|
The greatness of Hendrix to me is that he brought together soul, psychedelia, sound as music and texture and made it all a fluid whole. He could make electronic sounds musical and brought it all together in a happy, passionate stew that was palatable and understandable while providing completely jaw droppingly awesome listening moments.
So, that is why I picked Adrian Belew. He is soulful, pop oriented, rocks like crazy, has absolutely amazing touch and can take cold electronics and make them sizzle with passion. He has not had commercial success and he is certainly not an imitator (although I hear the Beatles in just about everybody) but he doesn't seem to care about the rules or doing what he's 'supposed to' he just makes music like he hears it and is passionate about it and follows his own instincts... that is what Hendrix is all about to me.
__________________
'never pet a burning dog' |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
To me, the magic of Hendrix was that he played the amps and pedals as much as he played the guitar. Some people that try to do this end up forgetting about the guitar part and end up sounding more like electronica than rock.
My vote is for Nels Cline...he's has different style than Hendrix, obviously, but I think the approach and spirit are pretty similar. A great mix of guitarist and mad scientist. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Tom Morello.
A fender (sometimes) a handfull of effects, a Marshall stack, & you have an innovator, capable of squeezing out otherworldly sounds from fairly stock standard gear (ala hendrix). Also there's a fair dose of GROOVE to his playing.Another hendrix trait.
__________________
Never, EVER, stop in the middle of a hoe-down" -Homer Simpson |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northwest Missouri
Age: 40
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
On the guitar front, the comments above about Jack White and Tom Morello fit the model of giving us something that we weren't expecting. That's what Hendrix did, right? --gh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
Doctor of Teleocity
|
I think the trick here is that we can't expect something that we haven't conceptualized...
Hendrix made lots of folks see the world 'with new eyes'. what if we asked... which musician is making a nation of kids see the world with new eyes? Lots of guys (including the one I suggested) maybe are just different takes on that new vision that hendrix provided... It is a pretty tall order... no doubt... I guess we'll know it when we hear it.
__________________
'never pet a burning dog' |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
I think I'm actually skeptical that we'll really hear anything new that's very good. After 50 years of rock in various forms, I believe it's all pretty much been done already. The first 10 to 20 years saw the most innovation take place...since then it gets harder and harder to come up with something truly original (AND great).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
__________________
When I die, they'll say, he couldn't play sh*t, but he sure made it sound good. - Hound Dog Taylor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
I like Lance Lopez... Lance has a lot more depth than the few videos you can find of him on Youtube, but you can get some idea:
One time I heard him sit in on keys at a local jam here in Dallas. He brought the house playin' deep soul Blues on a Fender Rhoads... He can play like that on guitar too. Lance is the real deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: London England
Posts: 71
|
....had Jimi lived, there is no way (IMO)!) he would now be touring with a strat and marshall stack heading a three piece. He was innovative and constantly evolving. I could see him embracing all art forms, and its not inconceivable he would have messed with loops, programmed beats and rap. Ceratinly it seemed he was pushing jazz-wards. We saw only a few years of Jimi's creativity, and those years are frozen in time. The path he was trailblazing was fast and furious. ..The Tupac analogy may be the closest we have here, for a young man at the cutting edge of where music is right now, is most probably in front of a computer - whether us old geezers like it or not. If the Jimi Hendrix tradition is to mean innovation, an unworldly amount of talent, and the ability to take an art form and push the boundaries to where there are no limits, then current guitarists might not be where its at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#61 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
I think there's still some new stuff to come out thats good to listen to, but it will basically derivative (ie covering old ground). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Northwest Missouri
Age: 40
Posts: 1,247
|
Quote:
I listen to a lot of 'World' music, and yes, I despise that term. However, I'm interested in the music from the emerging Indian and Chinese societies. China's music seems to be too traditional (and not updating it) or trying to sound like Western pop (or even punk, 30 years late). India, on the other hand... wow. Bhangra could still be the next Raggae. Musicians there are borrowing from their musical heritage and bringing it to a new stage. An ethnic Punjabi raised in London brought Bhangra to DJ mixing and hip hop (and you might have heard his work with JayZ). ...then again, check out this link: Ali Jafra - School of Rock, pt 2 Pakistan is learning about the history or Rock and Roll. I linked it rather than embedded it because I do not speak Urdu. I recommend watching all those episodes, but this is the one that mentions Hendrix. --gh |
|
|
|
|