|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | Shop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Bad Dog Cafe Hershey's Bad Dog Cafe is where Off Topic Discussion is welcomed -- but please follow our rules and stay away from subjects that turn political or have caused fights in the past. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 416
|
New Icon Coming?
After 60 years of producing truly remarkable instruments with the stable of Strats, Tele's, P-Bass, Jazz Bass, Jaguars and Jazzmasters is it time for a new icon? An instrument just as revolutionary as they where in 1951. There have been attempts in the past with new models that lived short lives. An instrument that embodies the Fender spirit, look, and mass appeal. Would love to hear what everyone thinks. Is it time? I have felt it is a bit overdue but know guitarist are diehards in their beliefs and could prove costly for Fender if many factors don't conjoin together to produce a truly astounding instrument..for the player and a place in Fender history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North NSW, Australia
Age: 36
Posts: 2,187
|
Guitar-based music is old-school. The instruments follow their music. You don't see many violinists in an orchestra playing lime green electric violins. They play instruments relative to their musical period.
Go to a Ministry of Sound Club. A Chemical Brothers concert ... there are new instruments that go with new music, and they ain't guitars. They're computers. The Rolling Stones started when the Telecaster was in diapers. They're still going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
The last important innovation in electric guitars came in....
1954.
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/jameswilsey |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: chicago
Posts: 1,650
|
Well...I've been working on my dream guitar since I was 12. Will it be released by Fender anytime soon? Probably not.. But I agree that eventually (given the patterns of history), that there will inevitably be a new guitar shape, sound, brand, etc. Will they follow the trend of the Gibson Robot? Maybe. Will the Parker Fly play a hand in the new direction of guitar ergonomics? Perhaps. The fact is this...There will be a new Leo Fender. There is bound to be another Orville Gibson. Right now, somewhere, there is a kid who dreams of becoming a luthier ( he/she at this point is probably prone to eating paste while teacher is talking, but they're out there somewhere). The fun part is to imagine what guitars will be 50 years from now. Or...even more amazing...is to think what instruments haven't been invented yet, that will some day shape the landscape of future music. However, I would like to think (given the current & ever-growing market for "vintage" guitars), that there is now & hopefully will always be, a 12 year old kid out there somewhere, picking up a Tele, Strat, Les Paul, or what have you...for the first time. There lies the next Jimi, SRV, Clapton or Page...The future is the most exciting concept we can possibly fathom, my friends...very exciting indeed.
__________________
"Is anyone here a Marine Biologist?!!!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Well Frogger...
Quote:
What the hell would we change? It ain't like the conversion from petrol to hybrid/electric cars, or some other advancement. Yes the Gibson Robot is interesting, but does it make better music? Look- guitars will continue to get better, and they really have been for a long time (I'm ducking for cover now- LOL!). The early years of Fender produced some really neat stuff. Must have because we try to duplicate this every day. But we are capable of producing equal or better, and at a lesser cost, due to modern manufacturing techniques. Doesn't mean we have, but it's possible. Are there innovations out there that will change the guitar world? I don't know. I'd bet though that if there is, and it ever hits the market, it won't do much to improver players, or the music. The latest innovation I've seen, that improves the guitars status a an instrument, at least among young people, is GUITAR HERO. This has to bode well (in some sense at least) for bringing the wee ones into the fold. Now if they made the controller in a Tele shape...! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
Anyway, it already happened, ESP, Schecter, and Ibanez revolutionized the "heavier side" of music, while Fender is more focused on the "lighter side" of music, and then theres Gibson stuck somewhere in the middle. (For those who can't tell, I generalized music as black and white, and Gibson What I'm trying to say is that music has changed since the 50's, and there won't be another guitar that appeals to everyone. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Yeah, there's really only so many things you can do with the body of a guitar. It's a limitation of the function of the instrument. I think any future innovations will be internal ones related to the pickups or circuit in some way.
If you look at the auto world there have been a lot of innovations over the last 100 years but stylistically in a lot of ways we're still all driving Model T's. At the end of the day it still has to have four tires and a steering wheel. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Age: 53
Posts: 344
|
Quality and consistancy will always continue to improve - but as far as innovations and shapes - we already have thousands of variations. The best ones have stood the test of time. And IMHO - the first were among the very best. Sometimes you get it right (or at least 95% of the way there) the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mint Hill, NC
Age: 62
Posts: 5,671
|
interesting idea, but what specific innovations would you incorporate that haven't been tried? would it stand the test of time?
__________________
Truth is stranger than fact ... www.myspace.com/woodymitchellmusic BAND PAGES: www.myspace.com/stragglerswing (Stragglers - Western Swing) www.myspace.com/loafersgloryband (Loafers Glory - '70s country-rock) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: roanoke, va
Age: 34
Posts: 353
|
There's not much to do with the guitar body. Hollow body, semi-solid, and solid have all been done, obviously. So it would have to be a change of electronics. Anything more, and it's not a guitar anymore (if you change the fact that it has strings, or the neck setup, etc.
We've done single-coil and HM pups, and piezo is out there. I think the Variax idea is the biggest "new" idea to come along--giving you total control of the sound via modeling. But, my guess is that these guitars will never "feel" as authentic to most people. They're a tool to replicate a range of authentic sounds. But they don't originate any new sounds. They're followers of sound, not fashioners of new sound. The guitar is in the never-ending "tweaking" phase. I just don't see much new mind-blowing innovation coming along that keeps it a guitar. But then again, they ALWAYS say that before some mind-blowing innovation comes along. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Denver
Age: 41
Posts: 1,406
|
PRS
is what some people other places might say. They do get the spotlight on AI and a number of other shows. Please do not flame me. I don't own one or really like them, but they are becoming a standard.
__________________
It just got better, I think |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 3,146
|
New icon? I doubt it.
Guitar players buy largely for looks or image. Most guitar manufacturers build variations on copies of Fender or Gibson guitars. The vintage market is big, and so is the relic market. Many people want old guitars (or at least guitars that appear old). I don't see that changing any time soon. Innovations will continue to be made, and we will continue to disparage them as getting away from traditional guitar values (e.g. the Gibson robo guitar) and reject them in the marketplace. Guitar technology is not standing still, but I see little acceptance in the market. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 416
|
Thanks everyone for the feedback. I think where Fender could venture and be successful is bringing back a new and improved versions of the Starcaster, Jaguar, Jazzmaster, and Lead series. After all how many variations of the Strat and Tele have graced our hands over the years so why not the others? Perhaps set necks, perhaps improved bridge design, neck profiles and fret selection, Pups that are very musical with a wider tonal range? I am old school and the new Robot Les Paul is a total turn-off to me and may appeal to some but I believe it will be short lived and I'm not talking radical approaches to these models but small changes that would all add up to a very superior version from the original. Example: Bring back the Starcaster with the same body shape with a set-neck. Lose the funky headstock design in favor of a Large Strat headstock, retain the humbuckers but provide coil splitting and add a piezo for acoustic tones. Just some things to throw around in your head but hey who knows with the right fixes perhaps the next icon could be a Mustang or a Duo-Sonic.
Last edited by frogger : May 2nd, 2008 at 08:18 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,769
|
Quote:
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Lincoln Nebraska
Posts: 416
|
And neither are the Strat and Tele and look how many changes they have had over the years. Can you compare the changes between the Strat and Tele compared to the changes on a Jaguar or Jazzmaster? The answer is obvious. What might the Jag and Jazzmaster be today if they had undergone the same? None of the models were ever "broken" it's just that Fender chose to keep evolving their two best sellers to meet the demands of the player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,769
|
Quote:
__________________
"You released the ******* fury!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 332
|
Find a artist that is doing something new, has staying power, throw in loads mass appeal, give them your design for nothing. There's the new icon right there in their hands, 'cause in every decade after them for the next 50 years from now everyone still wants to sound like them and look like them. But play the lottery first as your chances will be vastly greater. This is not my original thought, but I see the point.
__________________
No hurries, No worries. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
|
Here's why it's not going to happen:
Back in the 1940s there were very few companies making electric guitars, and only a very few managed to break into markets across the country. Supply chains were limited, manufacturing was limited, and it was a lot harder to get the word out. Only the really strong survived. Today it's much easier and cheaper to design, produce, and market an instrument. Everyone's doing it. There are so many models that it's impossible to establish enough of a foothold to become a new icon. The closest any company has come in the last 20 years is PRS. Look at the musical stars out there today. Outside of the metal world almost every one of them is playing Gibson, Fender, or PRS. 50 years ago, there were basically 3 choices for a professional quality solidbody: A Tele, a Strat, or a Les Paul. There are a few outliers, of course, but they were never popular enough to really compete. |
|
|
|