rozman
May 10th, 2012, 10:00 PM
I used to eschew pedals, now I shoe them (step on them) a lot! It is quite fun, actually, and I'm getting some cool sounds.
All of a sudden, this guy who could never understand why guys have so many pedals and big, fancy pedalboards . . . has a big, fancy pedalboard with 12 or so pedals on it!
My new pedalboard was assembled for me by a friend mine who is a studio engineer and a very meticulous dude.
All the pedals except the wah are isolated, and activated by, a Pedalracks loop system. So when I'm using only one pedal, my guitar signal is going through only one pedal. I step on the loop switches, not the pedals.
I know some of my pedals are true bypass pedals and some are probably not. Most of them probably are. I have a Rat, a Skreddy Screwdriver, a Bad Bob, a Greer Tonesmuggler, an Earthquaker Devices Dreamcrusher Fuzz, a Catalinbread Pareidolia, a DOD Vibrothang, etc.
But yesterday, for the first time, I plugged my guitar straight into my amp to see if I could hear a difference between that sound and the sound running through the pedalboard with none of the pedals engaged.
And I was surprised to hear a very noticeable difference. I liked the straight guitar-into-amp sound quite a bit better. It was just a purer signal. Not that subtle of a difference really.
So a guitar through one guitar cable sounds clearer and better than a guitar through two cables and a loop system (essentially like a third cable, I'm guessing). I guess that should be obvious, right? More cable equals more capacitance equals less clarity??
So my question is, would it make sense to use a buffer pedal somewhere in the chain even though I have everything on bypass loops? Is cable capacitance the explanation for the difference I hear and would a buffer pedal added to this already elaborate setup help make the bypass tone using the pedalboard closer to the sound of a guitar plugged right into the amp with one cable?
Or is it one or the other; either you use buffers without a loop system or you use a loop system?
Thanks.
All of a sudden, this guy who could never understand why guys have so many pedals and big, fancy pedalboards . . . has a big, fancy pedalboard with 12 or so pedals on it!
My new pedalboard was assembled for me by a friend mine who is a studio engineer and a very meticulous dude.
All the pedals except the wah are isolated, and activated by, a Pedalracks loop system. So when I'm using only one pedal, my guitar signal is going through only one pedal. I step on the loop switches, not the pedals.
I know some of my pedals are true bypass pedals and some are probably not. Most of them probably are. I have a Rat, a Skreddy Screwdriver, a Bad Bob, a Greer Tonesmuggler, an Earthquaker Devices Dreamcrusher Fuzz, a Catalinbread Pareidolia, a DOD Vibrothang, etc.
But yesterday, for the first time, I plugged my guitar straight into my amp to see if I could hear a difference between that sound and the sound running through the pedalboard with none of the pedals engaged.
And I was surprised to hear a very noticeable difference. I liked the straight guitar-into-amp sound quite a bit better. It was just a purer signal. Not that subtle of a difference really.
So a guitar through one guitar cable sounds clearer and better than a guitar through two cables and a loop system (essentially like a third cable, I'm guessing). I guess that should be obvious, right? More cable equals more capacitance equals less clarity??
So my question is, would it make sense to use a buffer pedal somewhere in the chain even though I have everything on bypass loops? Is cable capacitance the explanation for the difference I hear and would a buffer pedal added to this already elaborate setup help make the bypass tone using the pedalboard closer to the sound of a guitar plugged right into the amp with one cable?
Or is it one or the other; either you use buffers without a loop system or you use a loop system?
Thanks.
![$vboptions[bbtitle]](../../gifs/tdpr-headTRANS.gif)