|
|
64Strat January 29th, 2012, 02:09 PM I'm not well versed on current Martin guitar stuff and tried to figure out what the difference is between the Golden Era 000-18 and the 000-18 Authentic but I'm not able to come up with any real differences in the specs that I notice.
Anyone here know what they are and why the big price difference?
I'm considering buying one because I don't have that type of acoustic in my arsenal and I'm a fingerstyle player.
Thanks!
doublee January 29th, 2012, 08:19 PM Try UMGF forum if youre serious but I tried a D18 Authentic vrs a D18 GE and the Authentic was about 15% better, and it was a 2k upcharge, so it depends on your wallet, if you got the money go Authentic,
doublee January 29th, 2012, 08:24 PM Try UMGF forum if youre serious but I tried a D18 Authentic vrs a D18 GE and the Authentic was about 15% better, and it was a 2k upcharge, so it depends on your wallet, if you got the money go Authentic,
doublee January 29th, 2012, 08:27 PM Sorry for the double post I cant see how to delete it...
JohnnyRebKy January 29th, 2012, 09:27 PM Your post sparked my own curiosity so i read up a little. From what i can gather the Authentic is basicly a 1937 copy. They use the actuall pre war bracing which is lighter than the GE. The GE is a pre war desighn too but the bracing isnt " authentic" to 1937 even though its scalloped and forward shifted. The authentics also are constructed with hide glue as they did then. What the advantage to that is i dunno. A little more time and material cost+ labor is involved in making the authentic id say hence the price difference. I couldnt justify the price difference myself over true copy bracing vrs the GE scalloped and forward shift and hide glue myself. Martin stiffened up the tops for a reason as well
64Strat January 29th, 2012, 10:05 PM Your post sparked my own curiosity so i read up a little. From what i can gather the Authentic is basicly a 1937 copy. They use the actuall pre war bracing which is lighter than the GE. The GE is a pre war desighn too but the bracing isnt " authentic" to 1937 even though its scalloped and forward shifted. The authentics also are constructed with hide glue as they did then. What the advantage to that is i dunno. A little more time and material cost+ labor is involved in making the authentic id say hence the price difference. I couldnt justify the price difference myself over true copy bracing vrs the GE scalloped and forward shift and hide glue myself. Martin stiffened up the tops for a reason as well
Thank you! this is what I was looking for. I wonder if the neck profiles are different and what other things like maybe the neck heel?? Man! they sure are proud of those Authentics though! I can't believe their cost is actually driven up that amount proportionately. I'm sure the 000-18GE is a fine guitar. I'd have to play both and see what I hear.
jwsamuel January 30th, 2012, 08:01 PM Anyone here know what they are and why the big price difference?
Basically, the GE is vintage style but made with modern methods, such as Titebond glue and a truss rod in the neck,
The Authentics are made with vintage style and vintage methods, such as hide glue and no truss rod.
Jim
MiloCroton January 30th, 2012, 08:43 PM Basically, the GE is vintage style but made with modern methods, such as Titebond glue and a truss rod in the neck,
The Authentics are made with vintage style and vintage methods, such as hide glue and no truss rod.
Jim
Is it even practical to have a guitar with no truss rod?
64Strat January 31st, 2012, 08:31 AM Basically, the GE is vintage style but made with modern methods, such as Titebond glue and a truss rod in the neck,
The Authentics are made with vintage style and vintage methods, such as hide glue and no truss rod.
Jim
Thanks for the added clarity.
I will have to go play them each and see what I hear. But that is a really stiff penalty price difference, I'm not sure it is justified yet.
otterhound January 31st, 2012, 09:15 AM Authentics use a t-bar neck reenforcement and hide glue .
The truss rod is self evident , however the use of hot hide glue requires better joinery as hide glue will not fill voids . It also greatly shortens the usable time for the glue which translates to much different techniques being used for assembly . The Authentic series guitars are hand assembled off of the assembly line . There is actually one man that every employee at Martin goes through to learn the techniques .
It is ironic that I , amongst four others , had lunch yesterday with a member of Martin's management and the Authentic thing as well as the use of the term custom were topics of discussion brought up by that employee .
My presence was purely random since all of us , over 35 of us , were at the factory for a group tour associated with Ed-a-palooza and the table that I and the other four sat at had an open seat that this guy sat at . Yes , he did intentionally seek our input . This was at the Italian restaurant that is next to the Martin parking lot .
Back to the topic . The methods used for the assembly of the Authentic line do require more man hours and specific training that mirror the techniques of the past . They are intended to be true copies of the old style guitars as much as is possible , which leads me to another question that was asked . Martin would like to introduce a D28 Authentic but for obvious reasons they can't use Brazilian Rosewood . They do have a good stash of legal Madagascar Rosewood and he wanted input about using Mad instead of Braz with the Authentic badge .
I hope that this is helpful and doesn't muddy the waters concerning this matter .
Is an Authentic worth the extra money ? This is a personal decision that each of us will make for themselves .
As an offer of proof of my attendance at this event , you can see a group photo of us over at the UMGF . I am the bearded guy that appears almost dead center . All you can see is my head and it looks like I have 1 tooth when , in reality , my mouth is missing 1 tooth only . Anyone got a toothbrush ? :grin:
jwsamuel January 31st, 2012, 09:47 AM Authentics use a t-bar neck reenforcement and hide glue .
Correct. I should not have given the impression that there is no reinforcement in the neck. I meant to say that there is not an adjustable truss rod.
It is ironic that I , amongst four others , had lunch yesterday with a member of Martin's management
Sorry to hear that.
Jim
otterhound January 31st, 2012, 11:02 AM Sorry to hear that.
Jim[/QUOTE]
He was quite cordial and friendly . No apologies required because it was very interesting to learn from someone on the inside .
jwsamuel January 31st, 2012, 12:56 PM He was quite cordial and friendly . No apologies required because it was very interesting to learn from someone on the inside .
Glad to hear it. My encounter with Martin management was not very good.
Jim
muudcat January 31st, 2012, 02:08 PM My 77 D-41 has no adjustable rod and I've had not problems, as for the authentic, a friend of mine has one and I gave it a play, WOW, it sounded fantastic, slight v-neck so it played a little different than what I'm used to but a great, and expensive , instrument.
64Strat January 31st, 2012, 02:28 PM a friend of mine has one and I gave it a play, WOW, it sounded fantastic, slight v-neck so it played a little different than what I'm used to but a great, and expensive , instrument.
UH-OHHhhhh!! I was afraid of this.
Crap! :lol:
|
|