glen smith
January 12th, 2012, 08:41 PM
I would like to build a guitar with double chambers and f-holes in the top plate. I have some flame maple but it is only 0.150" thick. Is this too thin, resulting in a fragile guitar?
![]() |
||
|
|
Minimum thickness of top for a semi-hollowglen smith January 12th, 2012, 08:41 PM I would like to build a guitar with double chambers and f-holes in the top plate. I have some flame maple but it is only 0.150" thick. Is this too thin, resulting in a fragile guitar? Colt W. Knight January 12th, 2012, 09:06 PM I would like to build a guitar with double chambers and f-holes in the top plate. I have some flame maple but it is only 0.150" thick. Is this too thin, resulting in a fragile guitar? That is too thin IMO. It will be super prone to warping, cracking, and breaking. Most drop tops are 1/4" thick. I wouldn't go any thinner than 3/16". Maricopa January 13th, 2012, 10:22 AM I don't think it's an issue. The 'acousticaster' I did two build-offs ago was probably less than that and acoustic tops tend to run around .120" or less and have a lot more unsupported area. OTOH, nothing wrong with adding some veneer around the 'f' holes for insurance. glen smith January 13th, 2012, 11:09 AM I don't think it's an issue. The 'acousticaster' I did two build-offs ago was probably less than that and acoustic tops tend to run around .120" or less and have a lot more unsupported area. OTOH, nothing wrong with adding some veneer around the 'f' holes for insurance. Could you post a link to that build so I can check it out? I was thinking of making the chambers only as big as needed for the controls chamber and so the f-holes actually are in an empty portion of the body. I have all kinds of veneer I could use to build up the f-hole area. I believe the flame maple I have is large enough that I would have enough waste that I could use to reinforce the top. I will have check on that. Thanks for the input fellas. glen smith January 13th, 2012, 11:17 AM Maricopa, I found your build thread but none of the photos appear! Maricopa January 13th, 2012, 11:27 AM My provider recently deleted all my uploaded images so the build thread is pretty useless. Here's some pics though. http://www.tdpri.com/telephoto/data/500/Final_6.jpg http://www.tdpri.com/telephoto/data/500/Final_21.jpg http://www.tdpri.com/telephoto/data/500/medium/Final_1.jpg and a YouTube vid http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTJKw2HnAiM It's standard thickness with the back hogged out pretty much everywhere but the upper bout, horn and under the bridge. The back was left about 3/8" or so. glen smith January 13th, 2012, 11:30 AM Wow! A true beauty! Thanks for posting that. Maricopa January 13th, 2012, 11:50 AM Thanks, it was one of my favorites and I really miss it. I'm planning a guitar similar to yours actually, hollowed out double-f Tele with two P-90s. Might even keep that one. glen smith January 13th, 2012, 12:03 PM I was inspired by Scubadoo's chambered build which I think is a real winner! I have two P-90's in a humbucker size body that I am thinking of using. Guitarnut January 13th, 2012, 12:29 PM You could laminate the entire top to another substrate of a contrasting wood. Then if you bind the edges and f-holes, no one knows. If you go faux binding, you have a nice 2-tone, detailed edge. Mark glen smith January 13th, 2012, 12:46 PM Thanks Guitarnut but I don't have any other thin lumber that I could use. I will have to see if I have anything I could plane down thin enough for laminating. Maricopa January 13th, 2012, 01:12 PM That's a good idea Mark, similar to how side ports are often done. http://www.constantines.com/ and others sell dyed veneers that would work perfect. glen smith January 13th, 2012, 01:52 PM Thanks for the added input. I am taking notes. |
|