|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Is the Clean Channel on Many Amps Much of a Muchness?
There's a lot of discussion about modelling amps versus "real tube" amps. Not to mention the ones with a single tube state but solid-state everything else. It always seems to come down to which "Marshall" sound is more authentic or how much an amp can sound like a Fender Tweed if you close your eyes and forget it's neither a Fender nor a Tweed plus it has a smaller speaker to boot.
One thing isn't clear when I read this stuff. Is all of it about the distortion? I can understand if you want to recreate a classic Townshend tone you'd try for a supposedly vintage Marshall setup and play some of Pete's licks. Either it does or doesn't sound like Pete's Marshall stacks, right? But lets say you're playing something clean and you want either a totally undistorted tone (whatever that means on an electric guitar) or more likely a clean tone that responds with just a bit of edge when you dig it on a particular note. It's one thing to note that a certain old Fender tube amp is wonderful to play in clean mode. But if you're playing some new amp (tube, transistor or hybrid) don't you just want it to sound and respond in a pleasing way? Does it make sense to try to recreate the sound of a specific old amp like you do with heavily distorted overdrive tones?
__________________
ON HIATUS |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Not sure I understand the question in your title but modeling amps TRY to emulate the tone of clean amps as well as the picking dynamics and breakup character of those amps. This is probbaby the hardest thing for these amps to emulate...and when listening to things like PODs ,,,,usually the weakest point. The clean settings usually sound too sterile and not amp-like (in my experience)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 476
|
Everyone approaches this topic from a different viewpoint. Most (and I said most) solid state amps might get you a good sound at a low volume or even pumped up by yourself. It seems to me that most don't get through the mix of a band situation very well. I have found the same to be true with most (I did say most) multi effects pedals. You can usually get some great overdriven and distortion sounds but still won't get through the mix with a band. Usually the clean sounds are passible but not as sweet as a quality tube amp.
With that said, many channel switching amps can get a great overdriven distortion sound but may not get a really pleasant clean sound. I find it easier to concetrate on getting a real pleasant clean sound with a good quality amp and then get a good overdriven distorted sound with quality pedals. In other words if an amp doesn't have a great clean sound you will never get there with pedals. If an amp doesn't get great overdrive on its own you CAN get there with some good pedals. and btw I try to get a sound similar to the one I am trying to create. If I need an overdriven sound I look for a sound that I am comfortable playing with and try to let er rip. I never try to duplicate an exact sound. Chances are if you heard you favorite song played by that artist LIVE it will not sound like the studio cut either. Try to get something close that you can work with. Either that or get yourself one of every guitar, one of every amp, and a whole lot of pedals and read up on the artist to see what they were using at what point of their life so you can re-create their exact sound. And make sure you play exacting like them too. In other words don't get bent on all this crap. It will drive you crazy. Hope that makes some kind of sense and of course this is just my opinion.
__________________
BoB/335 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||
|
Tele-Holic
|
Quote:
Quote:
In other words, a halfway decent power amp stage and speaker might communicate a well-modelled distorted tone well enough but still sound crummy playing clean or nearly clean. With the clean tone I'd think little nuances of the actual driver and cabinet and circuit would come through pretty obviously, no?
__________________
ON HIATUS |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
That's what I said I play a '68 335 though a '69 Pro Reverb (Yeah I have a Tele too. They MADE me buy it There is a reason why so many different kinds of amps are in existence. There is no exact formula. What works for one doesn't work for all. Forums like this are great where you can hear different opinions but these opinions are only a starting point. Take it all in and then get out there and try some amps keeping in mind that they don't always sound the same once you get them home or at a gig. Just another monkey wrench to throw in the works.
__________________
BoB/335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Quote:
OTOH, I can see where all different kinds of distorted sounds might be cool for someone who's into that. I have to run now but want to follow up on the clean headroom comment by BoB/335 later...
__________________
ON HIATUS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 48
|
I think the clean sound of an amp is the most important. You can always push an amp with an OD or Boost pedal, But if the basic clean tones arent there, you don't have a very good foundation to work from IMHO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London/Amsterdam
Age: 41
Posts: 577
|
Quote:
Music is more of an art than a science. Trust your ears and train them too.
__________________
"Goodnight, enjoy the life you've chosen" - Bill Hicks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 981
|
For what it is worth I disagree about the comments with using a multi pedal I have been using a Digitech PR80 for more than a few years now in front of my amps as they have no effects including reverb and I have not have had any problems using it in a band situation to give me reverb and other effects like Chorus ect. It has worked great for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Not saying it can't happen, but I've never heard a SS amp or pedal produce the washy organic reverb that a Fender tube-driven version does.
I include in that all the amps which drive and recover reverb from chips like the hotrod series, PV Classics. Some of them can sound OK for reverb, but it's not the same and doesn't have the same quality. That doesn't mean the reverb on those amps is unusable, just it doesn't sound the same to me. As far as clean tone, if you are pre-breakup with no reverb, there's maybe not that much difference between many amps, except on different amps it comes in at different points. In those cases, colouring is probably down to the speakers.
__________________
My other Telecaster is a Thinline The Tele Bible, Ch 1, v 10 Love thy Telecaster, covet not thy neighbour's Strat! |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 503
|
I know I'm big time in the minority when it comes to amps..soo..here's my 2 cents...
Not all Solid State transitor amps are amp modelers. Period. End of sentence. I own two Solid state transistor amps that I bought mainly for the clean sounds. One is a Kustom 30 watt with 10 inch celestion and a real nice real spring reverb. No digital nothing. It sounds like a Kustom solid state amp. It doesn't claim to model anything. It's sparkly, pedal steel clean at very loud or soft volumes. I get good tone from it. I could care less if it sounds like any other amp. I like it for what it is. My other Solid State is a Fender Princeton 650. Its a 65 watter with a 12" Celestion, built in tuner and DSP effects. It is NOT a "moddelling" amp, instead it has 7 "Timbre" settings that are really just preset Parametric Equalizer settings. Does it sound like a Tube amp, a little here and there. But it does sound (to me) at certain settings like the cleanest, honky tonk riff machine I've ever played. Other times I coax nice jazz cleans out of it for Travis Picking goodness. Point is, to ME, I have yet to play a tube amp in the sub 1500.00 dollar range that gives me the kind of "clean" sounds I get from this 'lil out of production amp that can be found for under 300.00. Now If was longing for a nice smooth overdriven blues sound, well Honestly, both of these amps would fall short, and maybe NEVER sound as good as a 400.oo tube amp. It depends on what sound you are after. Try as many as you can, but for your own sake use your ears and not your heart when trying amps. Forget whether amps you are trying are Solid State or Tube or Modeling or Hybrid. Do you Like the sounds? Will it fill your need? ANYWAY: For me Peraonally, in the solid state .vs Tube internet debate, after trying a LOT of amps over the years, I have come to one conclusion: I rather play a good Solid State than an "okay" Tube amp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Viņa del Mar
Posts: 102
|
the Tubes works with 5 harmonics... and transistors amp work with only 3 harmonics... so you hear those differences...
if you don't hear those differences... you don't need a tube amp :hahaha:
__________________
Watch my Blog with DIY Tube Amps and Boutique Effects from CHILE : www.richon-caster.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
There's a fundamental flaw in the foundation of this comparison.
What is clean? With a guitar player, even our clean tones tend to be a bit compressed, there are harmonics present, the bottom tends to need to be firm but not boombox punchy, and the top end waveform is rounded in ways that are very tricky to replicate with silicon. I've heard some great clean SS stuff, but it is few and far between, and the difference between it and a great tube amp are clearly evident when you A/B the two. Some of the worst clean amps I've heard are the clean channel on tube high gain 100 watters. They are so linear all the way up to ear bleeding volumes that it would make sense to mate one up to a SS power amp instead, but I think that many of these guys are looking for that boombox punch, or they're using a lot of effects for the clean stuff, and prefer the ultra cleans. Conversely, the best cleans I've heard on multichannel amps tend to use a fairly classic circuit (especially for the phase inverter). It's no surprise that you'll hear folks comment on a great clean channel, but mixed feelings for the OD channels. IMO, the best solid state cleans I've heard were from the JD10 pedal, most Tech 21 stuff, a few old Peaveys, and the Boutique Clean model on my Vox Valvetronix. Everything else makes me revert to tubes.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
Yet, I will - BF Twin Reverb, Vibroverb. Super Reverbs and Vibrolux Reverbs can have awesome cleans as well, but I find them to be much more delicious when cranked, and the clean disappears. - Higher powered Marshalls (oldies) have wonderful clean tones, IMO. Right up there with the Fenders. One of the best I've ever heard was a modded JCM800 2203 (Apex Theory's guitarist, on their first EP) to do nothing but gorgeous clean tones. - If you ever get a chance to hear/try one, old Harry Joyce built HiWatts have incredible cleans, IMO. But you'll probably go deaf experiencing it. Reminder - this is EXTREMELY subjective. You'll get just as many folks telling you that Voxes, tweeds, Dr. Z amps, etc. all can do a great clean. There is no definitive answer. "Clean guitar amp tone" is a total misnomer, as far as I'm concerned. Every reply to this thread could list you a thousand different amps, and you might be unhappy with all of them. You're just going to have to try some, until you find one you like.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 476
|
Quote:
For some reason so many people skip over the Pro Reverb. That's probably why I never heard much about it myself. I wish I could remember what the heck made me check for Pro Reverbs that day. I got an extremely clean (cosmetically) '69 Pro Reverb off of ebay. I had tried a DRRI and a Minty MINT '76 Vibrolux Reverb and neither did it for me. At the time I used my '69 Princeton Reverb fairly often and can't remember the last time I fired up my '68 Twin Reverb (pair of EVM 12L's and extremely HEAVY) I like this Pro a lot. 40 watts, 2-12's and stays pretty clean. Probably one of the best really clean SS amps I've heard is a Roland Jazz Chorus.
__________________
BoB/335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Iowa
Age: 52
Posts: 985
|
Jazz players who demand clean tone more than not, use SS amps. BB King uses a Gibson LAB series and nobody is complaining about him. Recording studio all over the world use some type of modeling system.
I'm a huge fan of modeling amps and have used them for years as a home practice/recording setup with excellent results. I gig with my tube amps but would have no qualms about using my POD XT LIVE if necessary. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Philly Area
Posts: 48
|
You could do either.... but I find that running modeling pedals etc... unless you are only using them for effects like reverb / delay etc... causes a tonal mess with most tube amps. i think the best way to deal with the Pod etc... is right into the board.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
I have a 66 Vibrolux Reverb and it is a really great amp...but you are coorect the Pro Reverb is close to the same amp except it has 2 x 12's and larger cab and it sounds fantastic... lower wattage than a Twin Reverb...about the same power as a VR... Pro Reverb is a great amp... |
|
|
|
|