|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana
Age: 26
Posts: 141
|
Would I need to bias my amp for this tube swap?
I'm not too much of an expert on tube amps and tubes so please excuse me if this is a stupid question, but I don't like the tubes that came in my amp and I would like to switch from these:
To these: Would I need to get my amp biased? Can I bias it myself with some kind of tool? What would you suggest? |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Those are both New Sensor-made 5881s; the same tube, so to speak; what are you trying to achieve? Don't ask me why there is such a big difference in price. Maybe because GT isn't taking a slice.
Instead you might consider JJs or the new Tungsol (which is also New Sensor, but not the same as the above, as far as I know). Or SEDs, if you can get them where you are. Shuguang also makes good 6L6s (TAD and others). But it would be useful to know what kind of amp you have. And what it is you don't like about what's in there now. steven |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana
Age: 26
Posts: 141
|
I have a 1969 Super reverb and a 1966 Super reverb. The GT6L6s are in the 1966 and the 6L6WGCs are in the 1969. I just like the sound of the 1966 better so I figured it might be the tubes. It might be the circuitry though, I don't know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
So, yes, you have to bias. But have you tried swapping the tubes to see if it's the tubes or (more likely) something else? For the test, you wouldn't necessarily need to bias. They wouldn't be operating optimally, but probably good enough to tell the difference.
steven |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana
Age: 26
Posts: 141
|
No i haven't tried to do that. It's probably not the tubes, it's probably the amp. I need to get it converted to AB763 circuitry, etc. It sounds great, just not as great as my other one. I dunno. Anyway, is there anyway I could bias my amp myself?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Yeah, try some good NOS preamp tubes - a 5751 is my favorite in the input stage.
A '69 Super may be pretty close to a blackface as it is; the early SF were still AB763. If you have a 'hum balance' pot then it is the later circuit (probably AB568). If you have a bias adjust, then it is still AB763. The 763 specifies a GZ34 rectifier, the 568 specifies a 5U4. Check the tube chart. But even so, between 10-20% tolerances and component drift, the older amp might just sound better. steven |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boise
Age: 47
Posts: 60
|
Bias your AMP EVERY time you change power tubes, UNLESS you have a other tubes that are matched to the first. Also change your amp driver tube with a balanced 12ax7 every time you change power tubes. I have an amp that uses 2 power tubes and I buy matched JJ quartets so I have matched spares. I have an amp that I can bias myself, and it makes a HUGE difference in the warmth and presence. I would stay away from Chinese tubes. I don't have any good experiences with them. IMHO
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana
Age: 26
Posts: 141
|
Well after a while of looking around I've decided that I'm going to get two Sovtek 6550WE power tubes and a JAN Philips 5751 tube.
I'm still interested knowing how to bias my amp myself.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 412
|
Woops, posted in the wrong spot...
Sorry...
__________________
http://www.soundclick.com/darcyhoover |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 412
|
Sorry, I meant to post a new thread, clicked the wrong button.....
Just do your best to ignore my inane mistakes!
__________________
http://www.soundclick.com/darcyhoover |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
Quote:
How is a single 12ax7 "balanced"... or to what is it balanced to... itself? I have not heard these terms.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 465
|
I have a 65 Super Reverb and the best tubes I've found for my amp are Winged =C= 6L6's. I think balanced 12at7's for the phase inverter position (V6 ) are recommended by some and others think it's hogwash to get them balanced. I've never tried a balanced PI myself but NOS is recommended since 12at7's are relatively cheap compared to new production tubes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana
Age: 26
Posts: 141
|
Are you sure 6550s are not good for a 6L6 amp? I've read that SRV used them in a super reverb modded for 150w and 4 powertubes.. I dunno. I'll just go with the GT6L6s.
By the way, I noticed I have the AB568 circuitry. Can anyone give me some detailed instructions on how to convert it? I don't want to leave my amp with some tech just to get this so called easy job done and have him over charge me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boise
Age: 47
Posts: 60
|
A "driver" tube is a phase inverter. It is used on Most amps (Class AB). Having a balanced PI prevents "phase cancellation" between the power tubes. Having matched power tubes is approaching pointless of you don't have a balanced or near balanced PI "driver tube" All Fenders, Boogies and Marshall come with balanced Driver tubes when new. The quickest way to lose tone is have unmatched cold biased power tubes with an unbalanced PI.
Proper powertube bias and balanced drivers is a HUGE part of a warm full tone with ANY tube amp. There is a site "amplifier blueprinting" search it, it explains the process. Or go to Eurotubes, or Dougs Tubes or KCANOS tubes . com and ask those guys. I have heard the difference and I will probably NEVER own a fixed bias amp again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 885
|
Uh oh.
I don't mean to be neurotic here, but you don't mean "fixed bias"--you're probably referring to "non-adjustable bias".
Fixed bias means the bias is set by the circuitry of the amp, it may be adjustable. The other scheme is "self-bias" or "cathode" bias in which the current draw of the tube sets the bias. Carry on. P.
__________________
Listen to your mother |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Boise
Age: 47
Posts: 60
|
Quote:
Thanks for clearing that up that is a big deal!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ohio
Age: 47
Posts: 534
|
SRV also had one heck of an amp tech and very little was stock in his amp. Just changing the tubes to 6550 was only part of what he did to make them work in that amp and to get the SRV sound.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
Well, to begin with, the 6550 requires 1.6A heater current, compared to 0.9A for a 6L6GC, so you better make sure your 6.3V winding will support an additional 1.4A (for 2 tubes). There are other differences; the pinout is the same, but the operating conditions are different; they are not substitutes.
And I always heard SRV used KT66s, not 6550s. steven |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: maryland
Posts: 15
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|