|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 133
|
BrownF Princeton vs BF Princeton
I know they're different, but I'm a novice.
What would a brown face Princeton sound like compared to a black face? I have a black face and am contemplating a brown face purchase. Thanks, |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 939
|
This is covered pretty well in a thread here about the 64 Princeton.
In a nutshell, the brown Princeton is completely different sounding. More Marshally than Fendery. No tone stack, so you don't get that nasty mid-cut that the post browns have. General amplifier voltages are lower which makes the amp warmer sounding. Tons of midrange punch, and doesn't turn to mush with humbuckers. Why Fender ever changed it...I have no idea..... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 126
|
It was all about clean. From what I've heard Leo Fender loved country music and designed his amps to suit the country music of that time. Plus how many albums can you think of from 1965 where the bands used overdriven amps. The blackface princeton stays cleaner longer a definite improvement at the time.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.