|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lost Angeles and Orange County
Posts: 7,128
|
WHICH Attenuator? (long post)
I've got a 50 watt non-Master Volume monster. Other than the Pentode/Triode switch I will be wiring into it, I'm looking at Attenuators.
I've been reading up on all of the available attenuators, and I'm getting close to "buy time". I have not been let down by you fellow TDPRI'ers ever, so time to get some more help from my friends! Which Attenuator would you guys recommend? I want to use it for multiple amps, not just my main beast (including my 6 watt Champs). THD's HotPlate is OHM/Impedance specific - bummer for multiple amps. It also "compensates" for the human ear's response to high volumes (recordings are NOT the human ear, so does anyone have any experience recording with one of these?). Weber MiniMASS/normal MASS always seems to be TDPRI'ers favorite, but then again Weber seems to be any Fender amp fan's top choice especially due to the speakers magic w/ Fender amps. Specify which, the Mini or standard MASS, if you are for the Weber vote. I've read mixed reviews about Marshall's Power Brake. Some have even had the PTranny blow due to poor solders in the unit. Has Marshall resolved this recently? The only possible selling points thusfar to me are: 1. It's mainly for a Marshall, so I'm sure it's been designed and tested with Marshall's in mind. 2. The Marshall logo would match the amp's logo hehe ;) Finally, What's the difference between Weber's Load Dump and the MASS products? Are the extras in the standard MASS worth it, or would it be best to stick with the MiniMASS? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 961
|
on price, flexibility and tone, Weber wins. I think all the "first tier" attenuators (THD, Dr. Z, Weber) sound good (standard caveats apply for extreme attenuation).
Weber gives you mulitple impedence (for multiple amps) and all the bells and whistles you'd want for FAR less than the others. Plus, depending on your amp wattage, you've got choices: full sized Mass, Mini Mass, and Load Dump. The load dump is a resistor-type attenuator while the masses use speaker "motors" (speakers without the cones) to produce the variable load a real speaker presents to the amp. I started out with an Airbrake, but sold it buy Weber because I had Fender and Marshall amps, so my impedence issues were huge (2 ohm to 16 ohm). I now have a full size Mass, a mini Mass and a load dump. Love them all. Essential parts of my rig.
__________________
Elwood: Good evening ladies and gentlemen, we're sure glad to be here in Cocomo tonight. We're the Good Ole' Blues Brothers Boys Band from Chicago. I sure hope you like our show. I'm Elwood, this here's my brother Jake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
|
I love my MASS. Mines an older model. before the new rackmount ones before the Mini. I never use the DI features so if I were buying today I'd grab the Mini.
SOUNDS great with my Main amp, an old Marshall 2204 as well as my Fenders. very versatile and can handle all loads. that said the Hot Plate gets a lot of kudos esp on Marshalls. I'd love to try one some day but they are expensive. I use mine for Live and studio.
__________________
~ Hal *** I'M A DENIM DEMON *** |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Posts: 1,083
|
Don't get a Marshall Power Brake, the THD and the Weber sound better and are safer for the amp. If cost and multiple attenuators are not an obstacle, my personal recommendation would be to get a THD Hotplate for the Marshall and for any Tweed amps you've got, and a Weber Mass for any Blackface type amps you've got. If you have to have only ONE attenuator to cover all of them, get the full sized Mass in a wattage somewhat higher (at least 1/3) than the wattage of your biggest amp. According to Ted Weber, the Load Dump is for slight volume reduction, the Mass sounds better than the Load Dump with greater degrees of volume reduction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 122
|
Sorry for this temporary hijacking but I need to clarify something on the Webermass.
There's no electrical outlet plug required to give it electricity right? I'm just asking 'cause over here we use 220V and not 110V like in the US. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
|
Attenuators
I've used a Hot Plate for most of my gigs for over 5 years. I have no complaints at all, although I'd recommend not going beyond two "clicks" of attenuation. I've also recorded with the Hot Plate, no problem. The drag for you is that they are impedence-specific, as you mentioned. One thing to think about is that some amps, like Fenders (not Marshalls), are not fussy about matching impedence perfectly, so you might be able to mismatch without jeopardizing your amp. I'd give Andy at THD a call to discuss this issue. He has always been a great source of information for me. Also, he is a lap steel nut, so we get along well :D
I also have a Mini-mass, velcroed to the floor of my home-brew 5E3 cabinet. This amp is my small-gig, grab & go amp. The Mini seems to work well, but I have much less experience with it than the Hot Plate. The price is right, for sure, although I bought my THD unit used, so I didn't have to spend too much money. Good luck with your search. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 1,107
|
I have a Marshall 1987X that I bought a MASS for a couple of years ago. A friend came over to play the next day with his Dr. Z Airbrake. For the sake of experimentation, I did an A-B test between the attenuators and ended up sending the MASS back, eating the shipping and restocking fee, and buying an Airbrake. The Airbrake was much more transparent in my rig than the MASS, which, to my ears, had more of a PPI master volume sound. I have subsequently A-B tested the Airbrake and a THD Hotplate, and they sound pretty much identical.
IMO, YMMV, yadda yadda yadda
__________________
There is no substitute for Sound Pressure Level |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 920
|
Dumb question?
Are you guys able to get any clean sounds out of your rigs when using a Mini Mass? I got one for my Classic 30, and it seems to be impossible to get a nice, clean sound when the attenuator is on.
I called Ted Weber and asked him about it, and he said it was just the nature of attenuators. (Funny, I've never heard anybody say that, and it would be nice for him to put that in the description...) Anyway, have any of you experienced the same thing? |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 920
|
It seems to add a little bit of grit; not a big deal on single notes, but very noticable on chords, they sound very overdriven. It doesn't color the tone, so much as add "breakup," which isn't what I'm looking for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Flushing, Michigan
Posts: 4,631
|
There's a certain "fizziness" to the sound if I attenuate too much with my MASS. It disappears as the volume goes up.
I love my MASS. You just can't turn it down too far. I got the treble boost with mine to make up for the high end being cut. Even with the treble boost on, there's still a loss of high end. Not always necessarily a bad thing.
__________________
Timothy Jon Lamb |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 894
|
Don't forget the Dr.Z Airbrake.
It's a bit pricey, but can be had used for ~$225, and isn't impedance specific. It handles up to 100W, if I'm not mistaken. I have one, and although I don't use an attenuator too much, it's quite transparent. They're also pretty hot on the use market, so if you don't like it, you'll be able to get your money back pretty easily. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 961
|
I've never noticed my attentuators, themselves, adding any "grit." It may be that you are running your amp harder and developing the amp's natural distortion, which you can now hear because the attenuator lets you get there at reasonable volume -- this is, after all, one of the primary purposes of the attenuator.
As for the Dr. Z impedence -- Dr. Z is silent on the issue (as are most industry reviews). My understanding (when I owned one) was that it could handle a range of impedence (like, 4-8 ohms), but that was not selectable. Sort of like Fender amps being able to handle an impedence mismatch better than some other amps. Personally, I found it better to be able to select the impedence I needed and know that I had a close match. In any event, IMO you can't go wrong with a Weber, Dr. Z, or THD. It boils down to how much you want to spend and what features you want. To my ears, all of these units work very well within the general limits of attenuators (i.e., any attenuator at "10" isn't going to sound that great).
__________________
Elwood: Good evening ladies and gentlemen, we're sure glad to be here in Cocomo tonight. We're the Good Ole' Blues Brothers Boys Band from Chicago. I sure hope you like our show. I'm Elwood, this here's my brother Jake. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 920
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Hell-A
Posts: 304
|
Re: Dumb question?
Quote:
There is a tradeoff of course; if you have the amp cranked and attenuated, there is no way to get any reasonable clean volume out of it. The ultimate setup would be to have a two-amp setup with one amp attenuated and one amp unattenuated so you could switch between them for varying degrees of overdrive at constant volumes. Many people just set the amp up for mild overdrive, roll back the volume on the guitar to clean it up, or step on a dirt pedal for more drive or compression. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 961
|
Re: Dumb question?
Quote:
Just snagged a Lehle 1@3 to switch the whole thing . . . Yippee is all I can say.
__________________
Elwood: Good evening ladies and gentlemen, we're sure glad to be here in Cocomo tonight. We're the Good Ole' Blues Brothers Boys Band from Chicago. I sure hope you like our show. I'm Elwood, this here's my brother Jake. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oregon, but from Montana
Posts: 548
|
I still have a Scholz Research & Development "Power Soak" that Tom Scholz of Boston designed to give him Boston's clean sound.
Still works like a champ.
__________________
I would rather be a jack-of-all-trades and master of none, than be a one trick-pony out of a job. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 48
Posts: 2,528
|
Weber Load Dump here
I found that it does do different things for different amps, of course.
On my HRD, it made it meaner and narlier sounding. Basically, it put some drive in the clean channel. On my DRRI, it made it smoother. Most notably, it increased the sustain.
__________________
"Yeap, I like the American Standard Telecaster, I can even live with one a them PCB amps, and I even use one a them mul-tie-effects things too." |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.