|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#41 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Age: 46
Posts: 287
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ocala, FL
Age: 46
Posts: 597
|
Quote:
__________________
MadJack, Fender Standard Strat CAR, Agile AL-3110 Rootbeer Flame Wide, 2 SX Furrian MN's: 1 Ash 3TS & 1 HH 3TS, Xavier XV-400 (LP Jr Copy) Black, 2 VOX Lil' Night Trains, 1979 Peavey VT Series 212 Classic, Orange Micro Terror and Fender Greta. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 3
|
Hello all. Singing up here to see how this goes. I've been gassing for one of these as soon as I heard about it, and wanted to do some mods to make it "less fizzy" when pushed hard. I've got a thing for 5751 tubes, so that will likely be a "fer sure." With all the extra space, an extra pre-tube and a tone stack, or at least a single tone control seems like it might be worthwhile.
I know just enough about modding to realize that I probably shouldn't mess with one all "willy nilly." The Tube-bias trem is the thing that's halting me. I had two directions I wanted to go. First, upgraded steel and a pair of 6550As would make this a formidable "Clean" gigging amp, and could even do well with a lap steel plugged in. The other direction would be the possibility of some yellowjackets and a pair of EL84s. I love me some EL84s. Especially when driven hard with very little pre-amp distortion. BillM, would yellow jackets and EL84s work in this amp with the Bias-mod trem set-up, or might that cause some problems with tube life and the workings of the tremolo? |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 773
|
Louder and cleaner is better for me provided if it does breakup, its smooth and not ratty. And if a low noise floor.... thats great.
Best changes for me would be a switchable tone stacks and related eq. Like having it be able to go from blackface to tweed. Blackface gives you those pretty cleans and tweed ala bassman lets you use dirt pedals. |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
The more I think about it, the more I think it is a very good candidate for some creative frequency shaping and not a traditional tone stack. This seems like a great amp to break the tone control components up and put them where they do the most good.
To me, treble is best as late in the amplification chain as you can get to control harmonic content. A simple treble bleed in front of the PI, or phase cancelling treble after the PI would do it well. Bass is best done up front to stop early stages from making things muddy. That could be done by replacing the first stage cathode resistor with a current diode, bypassing it with a small cap to get the treble gain back and paralleling that with a larger cap on a pot to control low frequency gain. Both pots could be on dual concentric knobs in place of the bright/dark switch. The existing bright/dark circuit could be reworked to give the traditional mid scoop if desired, or reworked into a very flexible low loss mid control on dual concentric knobs with the volume control. Just some out of the box thinking for an out of the box Fender. |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
There are also some very good one-knob tone designs. I'll be having fun with this.
Dual-concentric controls are seductive, but it's generally difficult to find the values you need... or decent knobs. I'd rather have separate controls and mini knobs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#50 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
In my experience, most people that say they want "a tone stack", and we have seen that a lot, want at least 2 and usually 3 knobs, and look down on a one knob no matter how good it is. People can be funny creatures. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 773
|
My love/hate affair with the pro jr is great dirt and useable clean but an annoying hum/hiss.
My love/hate affair with the drri is great clean but bad dirt (no mid knob and tonestack that is overly scooped). Would the Excelsior have the opportunity to be a gigging amp? As loud as a Princeton Reverb or Blues Junior? Will it have enough useable mids? Looking forward to hearing about possible changes/mods for the Excelsior. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tulsa
Age: 43
Posts: 6,661
|
Quote:
This amp reminds me of a hybrid between a Supro and an old Ampeg as it gets turned up, and while clean, has a lot of Fender in there but as pointed out, not a blackface clean. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
It just strikes me that it is to far away from what you want, to be a good starting place. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Smyrna Ga.
Posts: 872
|
Hi Everybody
I had a couple of quick questions as I just received my Excelsior. Can the power tubes be changed without a rebias and has anyone noticed a tinny sounding buzz/rattle as you increase volume? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Yes, you can change the power tubes without rebiasing. It is a "cathode biased" design. If the tubes draw more current, there is a larger voltage drop across the cathode resistor, which increases the bias and reduces the current through the tube. It does it all for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 (permalink) | |
|
Friend of Leo's
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
I just got delivery on Wednesday of an Excelsior from Sweetwater and have been playing it a lot since then...the tubes that came with it seem to have been, well, questionable as there was a LOT of noise and a serious rattle when leaning into the strings at any volume above 10 o'clock. That 15" speaker is a serious reason to do just that, argh. Having read about tightening up screws ect because of rattles I did that without much success. I had on hand a new set of JJ power tubes and 2 Tung Sol 12AX7's and a few other 12A*7 family tubes but I was hoping not to use them. Well they went in this morning and what a world of difference. Having swapped them around amongst the 12AX7's, AT7's,AU7's and an ECC802 S...the Tung Sol's won out. The JJ6V6 S power tubes and those Tung Sols are graveyard silent, the rattles and rasps have vanished and the tremolo pulses are seriously cool. It makes me wonder why Fender with their weight as a manufacturer can't put better tubes in. I think this is really a great amp, that 15" speaker has a punch to it that can't be denied. The tonal range is really good considering you voice it with a cut switch and the input jack selection...talk about your tone being in your hands, this amp proves the point. The volume and SPL (sound pressure level) is really sweet in a 32 lb package it is definately good enough to gig with. I am REALLY liking it. Just as an aside I put that ECC802 S in V1 and a Tung Sol 12AX7 in V2, clean through out the volume range, deep tremolo with a VERY slight loss of volume but seemingly no loss of SPL it bacame a sort of HiFi guitar amp, I'm sure I'll play around more with the possibilities but for now it's staying with the 2-12AX7's in it. What a GREAT amp all in all.
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.