|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | TeleShop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 885
|
Is part of the hype about Class A due to the name??
I mean Class A sounds like a positive thing, you know, like Grade A, or A-OK.
If it had a geeky sounding name, like "Pfletogrotic Operation" would tattood salespeople, and your know-it-all acquaintences bandy it about? P.
__________________
Listen to your mother |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan - Tweenst the Great Lakes
Posts: 1,904
|
Quote:
Indeed, 99% of amps claiming to be class A are not.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: DC
Posts: 247
|
The funniest thing is that amps can't "be" class A or A/B.
Tubes operate in class A or class A/B, etc. But amps don't. So I guess you could have a class A amp even though the tubes operate in a class A/B.
__________________
"A noble spirit embiggens the smallest man..." - Jebediah Springfield |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Canada
Posts: 19
|
Not to get too picky about it, but if an amp is advertised to be Class A or whatever, it's implied that the designation refers to the power amp section.
All preamp tubes in ANY amp I've seen run in class A operation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Banned
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Silicon Valley, CA, USA
Posts: 3,803
|
Yes, but as was already pointed out, 99% of the amps that are advertised as "class a" are really class ab1 amplifiers.
It's all just a bunch of marketing hype to separate you from your money. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 885
|
No, No, No.
Simply put, what is meant by Class A operation is that your output section is biased so that each tube is carrying the full signal at all times. Most amps are working in Class A at very low volumes, but as soon as you turn up to "where the tone" is, not.
What it has come to describe is a cathode biased amp, often running somewhat hot, and sometimes having no negative feedback. Sometimes it just describes whatever somebody is trying to sell you, 'cause it sounds good, and what do you know? Your Bassman RI does not operate in Class A. Your Dr Z does not operate in Class A. Your AC30 does not operate in Class A. Your Matchless does not operate in Class A. Your Peavey does not operate in Class A. If you have more than one output tube the odds are 95-5 that your amp is not actually operating in Class A, no matter what the guy with the cocker spaniel haircut says. Move along, nothing to see here. P.
__________________
Listen to your mother |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 78
|
My next amp are gonna be Class A+. :D
__________________
Smokey's Forums |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Michigan - Tweenst the Great Lakes
Posts: 1,904
|
FWIW, a friend of mine has measured/tested scores of booteek and production amps; Matchless, Dr Z, tweeds, old Vox, new Vox, etc... Thus far, the only amp to be class A is the Allessandro English Coonhound, 4 EL84s producing about 15watts (about half of what a class A/B amp is capable of). FWIW, I played 2 examples of this amp and did not care for it. I much prefered the Allessandro Bloodhound which is a 2xEL34 class A/B amp. The Coonhounds were quite noisey at idle, spongey feeling and lacked touch sensivity. Is this a characteristic of a class A amp? Dunno, seeing as I've only ever played 2 (aside from SE amps).
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SoCal USA
Age: 42
Posts: 242
|
Dr. Z
Well, fortunately Dr. Z doesn't advertise his amps as Class A - he just refers to them (the EL-84 powered) as self-biasing. At least that's how he advertises now - I don't recall seeing anything before, but I could be wrong.
tomtheguitarguy |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 885
|
Well I have a Dr Z.
I don't recall anything out of Dr Z referring to Class Aosity, but I can assure you the store I bought it from was all over it like seagulls on a dumpster.
I buy amps with my ears, it's yielded me some fine sounding boxes, some of them fixed bias, some of the cathode bias, some of them with negative feedback, some without, some with tube rectifiers, some with diodes, some with ceramic speakers, some with alnicos... etc. A well-made, well-designed amp will sound great, regardless of its style. P.
__________________
Listen to your mother |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Afflicted
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,416
|
Defending the Indefinsible
Someone (mfr, retailer, player, whoever) says "Class A" guitar amp, I know, you know what he's talking about. The sound, the tubes, the design, the performance, the usual suspects amps.
I just don't get all worked up about it. Mik
__________________
a "motor-bike with a touch of blood in it is better than all the riding animals on earth, because of its logical extension of our faculties, and the hint, the provocations, to excess."-T.E. Lawrence |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 961
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) | |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 229
|
Re: Well I have a Dr Z.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
|
Randall Aiken wrote an excellent "white paper" on the topic of Class A. Basically, the true definition was full plate current conduction through all 360 degrees of the waveform, at the full unclipped output of the amplifier.
http://www.aikenamps.com/ClassA.htm Elsewhere on his site he debunks the AC30 class-A mythology. Not to bash the amplifier, far from it - it's a fine amplifier. But it should be regarded as a fine amplifier because of how it sounds, not because of what topology and biasing scheme it happens to use. Same goes for any amp, really...bottom line is, does she sing to ya? :D TP |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 36
|
its funny in virtually every add for an ac30 you see it says class A. as mentioned above they aren't. that aside an ac30 is still my fave amp of all time even if it isnt top of the class. if i could only get my sfvc back from that kid i lent it too...it is (was) my only class A amp.
what about audiophile gear?? i swear i have seen preamps advertised as class A. what does that mean? |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 885
|
All preamp tubes operate in Class A
At least in guitar amps.
It's the power section that gets the hype. The problem is, if your amp operated in true Class A, you the same (or larger) PT, the same tube complement, the same amount of electronics to make less than half the power of an AB amp. Audiophiles will pay thousands, or even tens of thousands for an 8 watt amp, you won't. 2 6L6s or EL34s would be struggling to make 25 watts in class A. You'd definitely need a fan. The funny thing is that people hear what they want. In Aspen Pitmans book he refers to "spongy Class A circuitry". Now this is a guy who must know something about amps, he must have played a few and heard even more. Class A operation is the opposite of "spongy". Because the power supply is running full-on all the time, Class A has less compression, more definition and more clarity, but we've been told an AC30 is "spongy" so that's what he hears, and attributes to imaginary Class A operation. It's a funny world. I don't get worked up about it, just amused. P.
__________________
Listen to your mother |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
|
Well, it's a classic case of what happens when marketing weasels get their little paws on engineering terminology - they always mess it up. :D Mesa's Randall Smith (a fine designer) 'stretches' the "A" definition in his recent white paper talking about class A and his new Lonestar Special. He neglects to mention that the definitions are supposed to be made at the full unclipped output of the amplifier - a 'weasel' that allows 15w 2xEL84 and 30w 4xEL84 amps to be marketed as "class A". The only true A mode on that amp is the single-ended 5W setting. If the push-pull settings were truly class A the output would more likely be 10-12 watts for the pair and 20-22 for the quad, give or take. Having a tube rectifier would be irrelevant, too. Using class to market that amp is a mistake IMHO, it stands quite well on its own tonal merits. I've played it, and it's hands-down the sweetest Mesa amp I've ever played through, and one of the nicest guitar amps I've run across.
TP |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: LIttle Rock, AR
Age: 52
Posts: 5,491
|
Quote:
There are some true class-A audiophile amps, and also some bogus ones. You can kind of tell the true class-A amps by the huge heat sinks. If it looks like a 500W/channel amp, but is only rated for 25W, it just might really be class-A. :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
|
SS audio (especially hi-fi) preamps often have op-amp IC's whose on-chip output transistors run class B, but that's the only place I can think of where the preamp wouldn't be class A due to the single-ended gain stages. The only place a single -ended amplifier is run in class B or (more common) class C (even longer cutoff) is in radio transmitters.
TP |
|
|
|