|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Resources | Shop | Gallery | Classifieds | Reviews | Register | FAQ | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Amp Central Station Amps, tubes, speakers & everything AMP related. |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, Ms
Posts: 63
|
Fender Custom Vibrolux... thoughts?
I've had two for about three years now and I can't gig without them. I've gotten so used to every nuance and they just feel like home. I've noticed that people seem to be one extreme or the other on this amp. Love em or hate em like. Take note in discussion that I am referring to the new amp which is not a reissue but a variation on the classic Vibrolux.
All the Best. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,086
|
I have an original '66 Vibrolux Reverb.....and I've played the new one on a few occasions at guitar center. I actually think they're pretty good sounding amps. They seemed to be a little cold....but nothing that some decent tubes and a goose to the bias adjustment wouldn't remedy. I actually think the speakers are fine as is.
They key to using a Vibrolux is to get the volume on 5 or 6. That's when the amp comes into it own. I use a Weber Mass to get the loudness under control. Below 5/6...it's just not as sweet. Whle my Vibrolux is very nice....it's a lot of amp. I tend to play my '65 BFDR much more.
__________________
Lance "not very good...but I make up for it by playing loud" |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, Ms
Posts: 63
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: New Orleans, LA + in the past
Posts: 5,884
|
Quote:
I've got a current specs CVR, I think a 2005. I actually liked it a lot, except for the usual hiss and the weak reverb which is typical. I was about to order a JJ upgrade from Eurotubes when I had an accident of sorts. That accident was a super clean current Twin for very little money. My, what a sweetie this Twin is. I'll A/B them and tell ya what I think.
__________________
Bubban0v |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Holic
|
I have a 2006 and I like it alot. It does have the hiss, but it's not noticeable at gig volume. I really like the way the amp responds to my playing. To me, a good gigging amp is more about feel than tone. Sure tone is important, and I don't want an amp that sounds bad, but in a live setting tone is more of an approximation than a science. This amp at about five, feels like i would want an amp. That's to say, it's very responsive to picking nuances. Don't get me wrong, this amp does have a great tone, but a recording amp it ain't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Tele-Meister
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eagle, Alaska (along the Yukon)
Age: 54
Posts: 160
|
I bought a TRRI cus 15 for the boy few years back; when I realized the reissues didn't sound anywhere's near what my 60's vibrolux sounded; I started looking for something better. I was at fender shop in Anch and played reissues vibroking,vibrolux, and super reverb and none sounded all that much better than my TRRI. The super sounded best though.
I ended up ordering a 35 Bruno Cowtipper. Now that amp even sounds better than my 60's vibrolux. I now use the TRRI to run rotary speaker, motion sound. It really makes that rotary sound good, the 85 watts I think. I'd never buy another reissue fender ever again though. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
The words Fender®, Telecaster®, Stratocaster® and the associated headstock designs are registered trademarks of the Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.
The TDPRI is an independent,member supported forum and is not affiliated with Fender Musical Instruments Corporation.