Why Do Fender Acoustics Have Such A Bad Reputation? - Telecaster Guitar Forum
The Number 1 Fender Telecaster Guitar authority in the world.

Go Back   Telecaster Guitar Forum > Other Discussion Forums > Acoustic Heaven
Forgot Username/Password? Join Us!

Acoustic Heaven Unplugged forum for acoustic players.

Asher Guitars WD Music Products Amplified Parts Mod Kits DIY Nordstarnd Pickups Warmoth.com Guitar Pickups

Forum Jump

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Old February 12th, 2011, 01:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
colchar's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 3,128
Why Do Fender Acoustics Have Such A Bad Reputation?

I've never tried one for more than a couple of minutes in a store but the ones I did try seemed OK to me so I was wondering why Fender acoustics have such a bad name. With all of the Fender love around here you'd think that some people would rate their acoustics a bit more highly than they do.

So what is it about Fender acoustics that have caused them to have such a bad reputation? Is it the materials? The build quality?

"All of Chuck's children are out there playing his licks."
colchar is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 01:48 PM   #2 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Age: 58
Posts: 7,860
Ever hear a good sounding one?
The 60's ones look cool.
Fender acoustics are like Martin electrics.
No bueno, IMO.
brookdalebill is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 01:59 PM   #3 (permalink)
Poster Extraordinaire
PennyCentury's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 5,013
The original Fender acoustic series (Kingman, etc.) designed under Roger Rossmeisl had the customary Fender style detachable neck, and an internal tube running from the end of the neck to the lower bout where the strap button is.

I'm unsure when Fender introduced acoustics made using traditional construction, whether it was under CBS or FMIC, but according to sources I have read, the second era were imports. I would surmise that the Fender acoustics of traditional construction have similar sonic characteristics comparable to other conventional acoustic guitars.
[COLOR="DarkOrchid"].Ceiling Cat is watching you peditate.[/COLOR]

PennyCentury is offline  

Sponsored Links   #
Sponsored posting

Old February 12th, 2011, 02:07 PM   #4 (permalink)
superhand's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Clovis, CA
Age: 38
Posts: 1,014
I like Fender acoustic guitars, and here in California at least, Fenders reputation seems to be doing just fine.
superhand is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 02:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: michigan
Posts: 2,684
I bought one (a $300 model, I don't know what exactly) that was an A/E and I returned it. The intonation was off. I played another identical model, same problem. So I got an Ovation that I love for a little less. I played several Fender models that where in my price range, and none struck me as great nor awful. The one I had but returned had a great tone and playability, but the quality wasn't there
JeradP is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 02:17 PM   #6 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
Bolide's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Rocky Hill, CT
Posts: 4,926
Fender's history with acoustic guitars is rather like a multidecade series of examples of how not to enter a market.

Fender acoustics were never total junk, but they were also never great.

Let's hope things work out with Guild....

otoh, their brief foray into high end jazzboxes, the LTD series, is the stuff of legend, surviving LTDs command high dollar on the resale market.

imo, Fender always saw acoustics as a marketing vehicle, a means to an end, rather than an end in itself so their heart wasn't into it.
Bolide is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 02:26 PM   #7 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
KevinB's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Jersey
Age: 65
Posts: 12,608
Acoustics have never really been integral to Fender's product line. I mean that have made some decent ones, but mostly they have been imports using laminated woods produced in some Asian factory under contract to Fender. I believe that nowadays they do some construction in Ensenada, but I'm not sure they make complete guitars there yet.

So, they are just more - typically Indonesian - imports, like many others. And unlike Gibson's classic J-45, SJ-200, Hummingbird, Dove, etc. Fender has no real tradition with acoustics.
KevinB is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 02:39 PM   #8 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
SamClemons's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Jasper, TN
Posts: 4,922
I have an old California series El Rio that I like. I like some of the old Fender accoustics. Most of their run of the mill stuff is just that. You could always get more guitar for less money if you knew what you were looking at.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	El Rio Small.jpg
Views:	483
Size:	50.5 KB
ID:	72950  
SamClemons is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 03:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
Alex W's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: In my tube amp coccoon.
Age: 48
Posts: 2,898
I wouldn't say that they have a bad reputation, I'd just say that Fender does not make fine acoustic guitars. They make acoustics with laminated bodies that are appropriate for beginners and early intermediate players. And within that context they're fine.
Alex W is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 04:50 PM   #10 (permalink)
Just-Jim's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,260
I know nothing about acoustic guitars.
I am on my first acoustic since April 2010.

I rarely go in to guitar stores. I usually buy things word of mouth without trying things out. I was starting to want an acoustic, so thought it would make sense to force myself in to a GC with a lot of time on my hands to test the waters. I was probably there for two hours and played around twenty guitars, without regard to brand or price (although on a very tight budget). I kept going back to the same guitar. It was a Fender DG200SCE Acoustic-Electric. There was something about the sound and how it felt that sold me, even over guitars three times the price. The crazy thing is when I got home, I could not even find manuals or much info from Fender on line. However, I did find a bunch of great reviews from people that felt the same as I did, basically a really nice guitar at a fair price ($400). I started to see all the negative responses on line regarding Fender acoustics in general and was not sure what to think. Anyway, I wanted give them positive feedback for at least the item I purchased.

Just-Jim is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 05:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Bill Ashton's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 1,084
On paper these look very good, in fact too good when you figure a Guild dealer is also trying to sell imported guitars (the GAD line)...but what is on paper does not necessarily translate to the hand...

Bill Ashton is offline  

Old February 12th, 2011, 06:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
rstaaf's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Upstate, SC
Age: 52
Posts: 325
I have had my Fender CD-280S for a year now and I enjoy it...

Click image for larger version

Name:	004.jpg
Views:	1688
Size:	41.4 KB
ID:	72970 Click image for larger version

Name:	005.jpg
Views:	699
Size:	33.9 KB
ID:	72971
rstaaf is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 12:43 AM   #13 (permalink)
Former Member
Doctor of Teleocity
mellecaster's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Desperadoville..USA
Posts: 13,646
Once you get into the Higher end Solid Wood Models (mostly Korean) they are Pretty decent, and take a Set-up quite well...The Laminated Topped ones are built fairly well, but suffer Greatly in the Tone Department IMO....Like most stuff...ya gets whats you Pay for.
mellecaster is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 01:14 AM   #14 (permalink)
TDPRI Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 83
I think that Bolide's post hit the nail on the head--in the "Karate Kid" style--one blow that set the matter aside permanently (so far,at least). I think that *some* of Fender's acoustic models were solid blows towards a worthy end, but that most of them were average at best. If you got one that you love--kudos to you.

However, I agree that Fender never put more than a cursory effort into the acoustic realm, and I was personally let down by the tele/strat-acoustic (-oscoustic???) models. My loyalty generally lies with the best product for the price, and while I really wanted to like, or even love, these models, I found them to be among the strongest arguments against FMIC's unplugged models.

As a bit of background, the bar was set pretty high by the "Esquire Custom GT" models of the mid 2000's. I finished my undergraduate work (obviously) in 2004, and never managed to scrounge up the dough to buy one back then. My local GC had one 2 weeks ago (silver with black stripe, if you were wondering), but alas--my taxes weren't done yet, so I had to wait for a refund while it went to a more prepared buyer.

My point is that I really want to love Fender's stuff, but I have to be realistic about my judgments. I know that a lot of people don't get my love for the custom GT series, but I'm okay with that. In the same manner, though, I'm not a big fan of _any_ of their hollowbody models (not counting thinlines!),and can agree to disagree. FWIW, I have a nice (but not sexy) Martin, but think that Yamaha pretty much owns the $200-$300 range, to paraphrase a prolific TDPRI'er. I'm not anti-Fender, but pro-"other stuff".

Really, I'd love it if Fender made a great acoustic for ~$300. I'd love it even more if it had the shape of a Tele. I just don't think that it's their thing. OTOH, I'm okay with that as long as they keep finding a way to get things done with solidbodies. I love my CV50's, and wish they'd give me a reason to drop $1K plus on a MIA model (new, of course). If they can get me an AmDlx for $1300 new, I'm there--and more than once!

Still, I love their guitars and amps, and aspire to one day be able to buy them with little to no regard to MSRP. Until then, my acoustic budget will likely to to Martin, Taylor, Silver Creek, and Yamaha, unless I find a deal...
boilerup2004 is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 09:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
Doctor of Teleocity
blue metalflake's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ireland
Age: 62
Posts: 11,140
They've had a long string of not so good acoustics, with the best beng the Japanese made ones in mid '70s. They were basically Martin copies and I had one which I kept for about 30 years before I moved it on as part of a down sizing exercise. The Japanese ones were easily spotted by an inverted vee notch in the headstock & would be a good buy if they turned up anywhere.

I've just seen that an old thread on Fender F15 has come back to life, and there's a few pics of the Japanese headstocks there.
blue metalflake is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 09:16 AM   #16 (permalink)
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dixie, Georgia
Age: 54
Posts: 669
A couple of years ago I was looking for a new acoustic. I assumed that Fender would be the best place to start. I went into every music store that I passed to test drive the Fender acoustics. I may have tried as many as 75 to 100 guitars. I finally decided that the Fenders were not for me. I eventually bought a cheap MIC junk guitar that sounded really amazing. After buying it I went into other stores and like boilerup2004 I found that the Yamahas were pretty good guitars in the same price range. I seldom play an acoustic guitar though.
roscoestring is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 09:26 AM   #17 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New York
Age: 25
Posts: 2,649
Click image for larger version

Name:	edit.jpg
Views:	483
Size:	52.6 KB
ID:	73026

I lost my picture of just the acoustic, but here is my fender acoustic. I don't know what model or when it was made, but my dad bought it for my mom when I was 4 or 5 (used I think), so its at least 15 years old. I love it, and it sounds great IMO.
That's just like, your opinion man...
Birdmankustomz is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 09:29 AM   #18 (permalink)
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Branson, MO
Age: 56
Posts: 148
Being a Fender owner all my life, I bought their acoustic. It was the most wrist breaking guitar I've ever owned. Sure not something you could do lead parts on. There are lots of mid priced insturments that play and sound better. Get the best you can afford. I now have a higher end acoustic and it feels like you have been "set free" to work the neck with great skill.

Life is great with a Taylor & Tele. Don't need anything else.
Sixwire is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 12:39 PM   #19 (permalink)
Friend of Leo's
colchar's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: The Great White North
Posts: 3,128
Just to be clear, I wasn't thinking of getting a Fender acoustic as I have decided on a Seagull, a Simon & Patrick, or an Art & Lutherie (all made by Godin). The reason I asked about Fender acoustics was that I was reading something about Phil Collen yesterday in which it said that he plays Fender acoustics yet the vast majority of comments on the web say they don't make a good acoustic. Granted, Collen can buy their highest end model or have them custom made for him but it still made me curious.
"All of Chuck's children are out there playing his licks."
colchar is offline  

Old February 13th, 2011, 12:42 PM   #20 (permalink)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Beach Ca.
Posts: 1,217
My Buddie just bought a relatively inexpensive Fender 12 sting that I was pretty impressed with.
Billy B. is offline  

Closed Thread


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

» Random Photo for Guests
1968 Custom Telecaster

2015 TDPRI Giveaway Major Sponsors
Fender Logan Custom Guitars


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2

IMPORTANT:Treat everyone here with respect, no matter how difficult! No sex, drug, political, religion or hate discussion permitted here.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 RC 2
© TDPRI.COM 1999 - 2014 All rights reserved.