Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry F
Here's a relevant quote. I've heard many versions of this. Something like 90 percent of resources go to addressing 10 percent of the problems. In our terms, it's not hard to make an amp that amplifies sound. The difficulties arise when you're trying to zero in on the sound you're after. That's where our resources go. I guess some people can't hear these nuances, but, as this thread indicates, other people can. It is highly presumptuous for people who can't hear the difference to tell people who can that they are wasting their time. It is even more presumptuous for people who can't hear or appreciate the difference, to tell those who can how to manage their time, such as practicing the guitar or whatever.
|
Those nuances sure cost me alot of money over the last 30 years.I think it was all worth it. When I started playing there were magazines and word of mouth,and going to the music store to try different gear.In the mid 70s there was no internet.Another thing we used to do back then was get with other players,and trying to learn from each other.I would seek out players that were better than me and try and learn all I could from them.There are many pros and cons about the internet.
Pros are the many musics stores or dealers online,You could find just about anything your looking for.Gear info can be shared.The ironic part is all the gear I have now came from online.There is not many music stores in my neck of the woods.
I have a few observations I noted over the years.There are those who think there gear is the best,and everything else sucks,inclued those who dont agree.Another thing ive noted is displaying ones gear as if were some kind of status symbol.Ive also noted and seen first hand,that those who have not been playing for long,and may not aware of the nuances are being mislead.They are being told this(popular boutique gear)is the best.It may or may not be for them.Thats enough hot air from me for now